Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Mount Remote Filesystems via SSH

Posted by michael on from the just-because-you-can dept.

eval writes "Ever wanted secure access to your files at work or school, but didn't have the necessary permissions or were thwarted by a firewall that allowed ssh access only? The SHFS kernel module allows you to mount directories from machines to which you have shell access. File operations are executed as shell commands on the server via SSH (or rsh). Caching keeps it reasonably fast, and remote commands are optimized based on the server's OS."

8 of 269 comments (clear)

  1. LUFS! by Santabutthead · · Score: 5, Informative

    Big deal! I've been doing this for close to a year now, with lufs (http://lufs.sf.net). It's not really the easiest thing to automate but it sure works for day-to-day computing.

    1. Re:LUFS! by TTimo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well .. lufs is the main player in userland filesystem stuff really. It has had sshfs functionality for months. Very slick.

      The difference seems to be that SHFS does some amount of caching, which lufs doesn't do afaik. This has a good chance to improve performance.

    2. Re:LUFS! by clump · · Score: 5, Informative

      LUFS deserves a lot of credit. I now use LUFS's SSHFS to mount my remote file volumes, whereas I previously used a tunneled NFS setup. The latter is a bear to setup but wonderful when operating. LUFS's SSHFS on the other hand requires zero setup on the server, no portmapper on either client or server, and is much easier to automate and control.

      I am looking forward to trying SHFS, but currently very much enjoy LUFS and the hard work put in by its authors. And that means your work on it too, TTimo ;)

  2. Another option by Guiri · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just type fish://user@host in your Konqueror location bar ;). It works great!

    --

    DVD Ripping, Divx, VCD, SVCD under Linux
    1. Re:Another option by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Informative
      I would say you're right, except the kernel does a lousy job of implementing filesystems in a user-friendly way. KDE IOSlaves are so much cooler for several reasons:
      1. They use URLs everywhere, which makes it easy to access local and remote files anywhere using any protocol from any application.
      2. New filesystems can be installed and activated by the user, you don't need a kernel module.
      3. You don't have to mount anything anywhere.
      4. Non-filesystem like protocols such as HTTP and POP3 can be easily implemented as IOSlaves and then used from any application.

      These features make IOSlaves much cooler than kernel filesystems IMHO.
      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  3. You might want to have a look at... by yanestra · · Score: 5, Informative

    avfs and lufs are much more common solutions to the "mount userland filesystems" problem. Yet, avfs makes it easy to construct your own whatever-you-want filesystem.

  4. Re:If you don't have permissions... by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Informative
    f you don't have permissions to use network connections other than SSH, are you going to have permissions to mount a filesystem on the computer?


    Could be: for example, where I work I'm behind a corporate firewall, but I have admin rights on my workstation. As a result, I could very easily mount a remote file system via SSH. In fact, since I administer an FTP server that is outside the firewall, being able to mount it as a file system in a secure fashion would be quite useful.

    Just because network ingress is controlled does not mean that your workstation is controlled. In many ways, this is no different than you burning a CD of your files at home and bringing that into work - the infection/cracking risk is the same. If you are not allowed to mount an external file system then you should not be allowed to mount a local file system.

    However, just because you CAN access your home machine does not mean you SHOULD.
    --
    www.eFax.com are spammers
  5. Re:Good idea but... by skurken · · Score: 5, Informative

    No I think it's ment to be used the other way around. This way, I can mount my UN*X school account that allows shell access on my Linux computer at home (where you usually have root access). /S