Slashdot Mirror


Major Tablet PC Running Into Problems?

An anonymous reader writes "As Digitimes says : Global sales of Tablet PCs have not been as strong as expected, and major Tablet PC vendors like Acer and Hewlett-Packard (HP) have even experienced declining sales of the products, sources said. Acer, which claims it sold about 35,000 Tablet PCs worldwide in the fourth quarter of 2002, saw sales of the product plunge by over 50% in the first quarter of this year. " I actually saw/held my first Tablet PC last week - it was one of Fujitsu series machines, and I was pretty impressed by it. It'd make a good business/school machine, but I don't think you'd want it for gaming and the like.

40 of 347 comments (clear)

  1. Gaming? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It'd make a good business/school machine, but I don't think you'd want it for gaming and the like.

    In other news, I think a dishwasher is a good idea, but won't be using one to wash my clothes any time soon.

    Tablet PCs are simply not designed for gaming, so saying you would not use one for gaming is a bit superfluous.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Gaming? by ratbag · · Score: 4, Funny
      In other news, I think a dishwasher is a good idea, but won't be using one to wash my clothes any time soon.


      No, but you can cook a salmon rather well in a dishwasher.

      Rob.
    2. Re:Gaming? by ratbag · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oops, forgot the salmon link

    3. Re:Gaming? by machine+of+god · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think that pointing out that a factor against a tablet pc might be that it is a specialized device with a limited market, as opposed to a computer. Pretty much everyone who can afford it gets a computer. Not everyone gets (or wants) a tablet pc.

    4. Re:Gaming? by MikeFM · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem is that most people aren't really sure what to use tablets for. They are great for business use where your staff needs to be able to work with information as they walk and a PDA is to cramped or lowpowered. They are okay for lugging around the house for Net use or even for watching ripped movies. I like to plug a Happy Hacker keyboard in and use one as a laptop to code on (I find it more convient being able to remove the keyboard when not needed).

      They could even be good for low power games (think GameBoy with a much bigger screen) if there were a joypad style mouse button and the buttons were positioned properly.

      The other problem is that these things tend to cost as much as a laptop. If they could get them into the upper range of PDA prices while retaining their PC-like features then they'd kick ass. The ProGears were a great hacking bargain once they went out of business and were available for $400 each. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    5. Re:Gaming? by buzy+buzy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't know about this.

      I gotten my fastest time on minesweeper using a tablet PC. I find it much easier using the stylus rather then the mouse.

      --
      If you get modded down for a first post... What do you get for a last post?
    6. Re:Gaming? by Hast · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of those I've seen (online, never seen one IRL) have had a keyboard as well. Some has a detachable keyboard and some are like a laptop but with a rotateable screen.

      That's the kind I'd get, and if I were hunting for a laptop I'd probably get one which is "tabletable".

      If that's what you get then it's worth the price. Those that are a "big PalmPC" are however generally way too expensive for the bang. As you say, you don't want to get a big PalmPC for the price of a laptop.

    7. Re:Gaming? by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only if its a lemon dish washer detergent.

      --
      Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
      -- Cicero
  2. bang for the buck by cheese_wallet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tablet PCs are sort of like a large pda... At least that's where I see their usefulness. Ipaqs are cool, but the screen is too small to be useful, IMO.

    A tablet PC, especially the kind that can unfold to into a laptop, is what I've been wanting for a very long time.

    But the price is just crazy, $2600? I'd consider paying $1000. $2600 Could by a pretty slick laptop that cleans the floor with a typical tablet pc.

    1. Re:bang for the buck by angle_slam · · Score: 4, Insightful
      $2600 Could by a pretty slick laptop that cleans the floor with a typical tablet pc.

      $2600 buys a decent $1000-1500 laptop with enough left over to buy a 3GHz desktop gaming machine.

    2. Re:bang for the buck by cheese_wallet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are a couple different types of Tablet PCs. I forgot the exact names, but there is the swivel type, much like you describe. I think toshiba makes one of these, I've seen it at compusa. It looks like it would break very easily (the swivel part).

      The other type is called a Slate type tablet PC. no keyboard.

      Personally, I'd like the swivel type, but it looks very breakable... might be to costly to make a robust version. I've horsed around with the demo TPCs, and for the most part, the pen input sucks. And by that I guess I mean the app support. The office apps are difficult to use this way, and the handwriting recognition is still painful. So I'd want a keyboard for most of the input.

      But it'd be great to have a TPC in a meeting... not for notetaking, but just to have access to docs and specs and the like, and then to be able to mark them up a little. Hard copy is the easiest to work with, but I hate having a bunch of copies of specs laying around my cube. Seems like every time I toss one, it had some note on page 402 that I needed to keep.

    3. Re:bang for the buck by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the point is that Tablet pc' have been and always be a Vertical market item.

      When tablet Pc's came out in 1988 and when they were re-introduced as the "new thing" the last time in 1995 by microsoft at Comdex with Windows 95 for pen computing... thay also failed miserably in the broad market.

      They are not for the general user. the general user hates them after the initial "geee.... ohhhh" period wears off. they are perfect for Insurance adjusters, doctors, supplier's and inventory management. for anything else they are 100% worthless except for the part that they are still a computer.

      Microsoft was completely idiotic for trying to push them, HP was blindly stupid for even trying to get into Fujitsu's and Panasonic's world by selling a crap version of a real Tablet PC. (A real Tablet pc can take lots of abuse as they are know to be put in the abuse realm because of their job.)

      Tablet Pc's have their use, I use one with my SL-5500 to manage my IT sphere of 3 offices and it's WAN better than anyone else in the huge company I am a part of...(can you say 10,000+ offices) because I can adapt this vertical technology to my uses and adjust my work patters to fit with the tablet PC. asking a home user, or sales person to alter how they work is asking a orange to be an apple.... it ain't gonna happen.

      so this news of it's dismal failure is no suprise. Everything that Microsoft has tried to push that is radically different is a massive failure... The auto-pc being one of their largest failures next to BOB...

      I am just more suprised that we keep seeing them trot out last decades failures over and over and over again.....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:bang for the buck by krb · · Score: 4, Informative

      these do exist. Acer makes one called the C110 and there's an HP/COMPAQ model named the TC1000.

      The Acer is a bit pricer but uses a more powerful *and* more energy efficient Pentium M whereas the compaq uses a ULV Pentium III. They're called convertables and appear to be fairly resilient from the reviews i've read.

      The biggest beef with tablet pc's i've seen are that their screens (with the exception of one very expensive toshiba slate) are not too viewable outside. i'd buy one of those acers right now if it had any kind of decent outdoor performance. i may anyway -- i haven't decided how much direct sunlight it's likely to get.

      Incidentally, the reason it seems like a gimmick to you is that you only deal in text. For text, a keyboard is likely to be far quicker than a tablet. In my case, i'm drawn to tablets (no pun intended, i swear) because i would like to be able to make sketches and draw out diagrams naturally. I also hate to have to carry sheafs of paper that deal with the text notes i've got on my laptop... this is convergence of the best kind in my situation. There are a lot of things that are simpler and clearer to work on in a free form way and don't lend themselves to expression in pure text. and don't mention "drawing" with the trackpad... that's apples to elephants.

      --
  3. Steve Jobs/Tablets will fail but info needs iPods by adzoox · · Score: 5, Interesting
    At The D: All Things Digital Conference Steve Jobs explained why Tablet PCs aren't necessarily in Apple's future and that he sees them as a failure.

    While I do believe he is correct, I think he may be off base with the PDA. This is one of the only devices that I would like to see be more "all in one". I'd personally like a Sony Ericsson p800 style PDA phone that had the screen from a Clie NZ90, GPS, iPod sized hard drive, megapixel camera, the VERY cool remote control center from Sony, 802.11g and Bluetooth + an Mp3 player and DIVX/MPEG4 decoder. While something like this would be in the high end (probably where the NZ90 is = $800 + $100 802.11 card) I still think it'd fly off the shelf, and possibly be subsidized by cell phone companies, at least in part with service agreements.

    I still hope Apple is considering such a device or at least with most of the features listed here with a compact flash & SDIO slot.

    I know there's a little link overload, just illustrating how easily this could be done right now!

    All of this could be squeezed into a current form factor Sony Clie.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  4. It's the price by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tablet PCs are cool and just about everyone who plays with one wants one. Then they look at the price and decide to get a laptop with more memory and a faster processor for less...

    --
    - -
    Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    1. Re:It's the price by tmark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And there are some of us who think laptops are cool but when we look at the price we go and buy desktops with more memory and a faster processor for less.

      If you can't afford to pay the premium for the very features that make tablets(laptops) cool, then you probably don't need a tablet(laptop) in the first place.

    2. Re:It's the price by AWhistler · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree with kmosen on this. Several years ago there were three types of printers: dot matrix, inkjet, and laser. I know, there are others (daisy wheel), but I'm not going back that far. Everyone bought dot matrix because they were cheap and good enough. But everyone also drooled over the inkjet printers because they were much quieter than dot matrix, and almost as good as laser printers. But nobody bought them. Why? The price was too high. How do I know? Because HP's Deskjet 500 was one of those printers. At $600 it was too expensive. HP decided to get out of the inkjet market since they weren't selling well. So this discontinued the Deskjet 500 and cut the price to $350. That was about the same price as a decent dot matrix printer. They cleared out the warehouses in record time; people bought them as fast as they could. In fact, HP reconsidered their tactics and reopened the plants that were making the Deskjets. Of couse, they kept the price at $350, and they kept selling.

      Soon Canon, Epson and others were getting killed by HP, so they lowered their prices too. The result is that today we have a fantastic market in inkjet printers. I think the Newton fell victim to this as well, but there was no alternative at the time, and so the market dried up, until Palm came around and reintroduced the idea smaller and cheaper, albeit not as high-powered as the Newton. This is what will happen to the tablet PC's as well, if they don't wise up and lower the prices.

  5. Not surprising by cperciva · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The people who absolutely must have the latest gadgets bought them during the first few months; the rest of us haven't had any reason to buy them.

    Next year, there will probably be better operating system and application support, and at that point tablets will actually be useful; but until then the only market which exists is already saturated.

  6. Gaming PC by OmniVector · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It'd make a good business/school machine, but I don't think you'd want it for gaming and the like

    But you see, that's the whole point. A tablet PC isn't effective if you can't hold it in your hands and write on it, and that means it's got to be tiny. If you're going to get a laptop, you're either going to get a small laptop that's not so fast, or a bulky laptop that is blazin'.

    It's not much fun sportin' a 7 pound tablet, I mean common we've been out of the stone ages for awhile :)

    --
    - tristan
  7. Re:Steve Jobs/Tablets will fail but info needs iPo by CptChipJew · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tack on a CDR, and you've just made yourself a laptop with a tiny screen.

    Although, Steve Jobs is justifiably wary about PDAs with the failure of the Newton, which I still think is an awesome device.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
  8. I'm not surprised by 73939133 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tablet PCs are physically too large and heavy. Much of that is driven by the requirements of running Windows XP: you need a harddisk and a powerful processor.

    The software isn't all that great either. The connected handwriting recognition system is actually not too bad in terms of raw recognition performance, but its integration and user interface is awful. Speech recognition is laughable. Your best bet is the on-screen keyboard or the PDA-like recognizer.

    I think a compact tablet with a high resolution 1024x768 screen, long battery life, but without a harddisk and with a low-power processor, would likely be more successful--provided it ran something better than Tablet PC. In fact, even PocketPC would probably be better than TabletPC.

  9. Promotion, perchance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Major Tablet PC Running Into Problems?

    Well, I'm sure if Major Tablet PC got promoted to Lieutenant Colonel Tablet PC, he could pull rank and avoid doing the damn obstacle course where he keeps running into things. :P

  10. The Newton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ah, but The Newton wasn't Steve Jobs idea, it was Sculley's. (Another minute reason Steve is wary about PDAs=pride). Also, the Newton as described in the article you linked, didn't have Steve's vision or Ive's design.

    And seriously, about the CDR, WHY NOT put a firewire port on it? WHY NOT make it run full Mac OSX? (Built in disc burning)

    Small screen or not, very useful!

  11. The Problem is the price by Deathlizard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A friend of mine has the Toshiba Tablet PC. It's pen has a tremendous feel and its excellent for sketching, and typing since it folds out to be a full flegded laptop.

    Is it worth $2000+ when I can get a laptop for $1000+ that can basicially do the same thing except Now I can't use a pen? No way. That's the problem with them. they are nowhere near price competitive to traditional laptops. If they were then would be selling like hotcacks.

    Its a cool technology that prices itself out of the market. pure and simple.

  12. Try working in the BioMed industry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At my office (which is Windows only, none of that Linux stuff here), we use Tablet PC's because they make sense. Doctors and nurses can review charts, make notes, change scripts and do what needs to be done on the spot without having to open a laptop up and start typing or waiting to get back to their desks (and remember everything they wanted to do/say).

    No, tablet PC's are not the solution to everyone, but they are for the medical industry. And Microsoft already has deep roots in the medical industry.

  13. Re:you just need a p800! by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Uggh. This is why I hate the state of the mobile device industry right there. There are four major kinds of flash media, all incompatible with each other. Rather than come up with innovative devices that all use the same media (compactflash would have been a good choice since it was the first, and arguably the most open), the companies decided to all come up with their own formats and compete in this space.

    Imagine if all the major computer makers had come up with different kinds of floppy disk in the early 90's, all incompatible with each other? Sounds pretty idiotic in retrospect, right? Well, that's what's happening in the industry right now with flash media. SD, MMC, SM, CF, MS, this is not only inconvenient but it's probably confusing as heck to the non-computer literate.

  14. Lower The Price, Sell 'em to Students by peatbakke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've worked with a few tablet PCs, and I have to say that that there is a huge market for them from college students ... if the price is right.

    The tablet PC is fantastic for taking notes during lectures. It's unobtrusive, and you can turn the handwriting recognition off while you're maddly scribbling notes and drawing diagrams. Plug in a mic, and you've got a recording of the lecture for future reference.

    Later on you could run the recognition software, reorganize your notes, highlight, e-mail, print, etc. etc. Plug in a keyboard and a mouse, and suddenly you've got a "normal" computer for browsing the 'net, writing papers, and, erm, acquiring music.

    The "perfect" tablet for this market would have a lightweight OS, 10GB HD, wifi, low power CPU (Crusoe?) and dimensions roughly the same as an A4 or 8x10 pad of paper (12.1" screen, ~1/2" thick).

    How many students would buy one if they were under $1000? What's your personal price point?

  15. Unattractive to early adopters by rtechie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As many people have said, one one the big reasons TabletPCs aren't doing well is price. What they aren't saying is that most of that extra price comes from the expensive LCD touchscreen, which is necessary for pointing with a stylus and handwriting recognition.

    And it's that latter feature that's killing adoption. People just don't want handwriting recognition, especially the kind of power users likey to be eraly adopters of new technology. Why? Simply because handwriting recognition at this stage is still pretty buggy, and even if it wasn't, HANDWRITING ISN'T AS FAST AS TYPING. As I suspect most power users are fairly good typists, handwriting recognition is of little value to them.

    And as a "new generation" of users that have grown up with computers matures, there will be even less incentive for handwring recognition. Anyone notice the trend in PDAs has been towards keyboards and away from recognition? This isn't a coincidence, it's the maturing market base.

  16. pressure sensitivity by Pflipp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I, as many others, repeat my argument: if these things were pressure sensitive, they would have been a hell of a drawing tool, but as they're not, they're just some sort of computers which are in some cases even more limited than normal ones.

    --
    "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
  17. Re:Steve Jobs/Tablets will fail but info needs iPo by LordBodak · · Score: 3, Insightful
    While I admit it can be annoying to carry so many devices around, I think I am one of the few that does NOT want the cell phone and the PDA to converge. Right now it's just too big a hassle. I want to be able to hold my PDA in my hand and look at my schedule while I'm on the phone. Yes, I could use a handsfree kit on my PDA-phone, but then you have the tangle of cords, etc.

    I think the answer lies in Bluetooth. Give me a Bluetooth phone, my Palm Tungsten T, and a Bluetooth headset and I'll be happy.

    --
    LordBodak's journal.
  18. My experience ..... by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 5, Informative

    With tablet PCs has generally been positive. We've tried out two different models, the Toshiba 3505 and Compaq TC 1000. Both have their shortcomings but both are incredibly useful as well. I purchased the Toshiba for our CEO who uses it constantly for presentations, notetaking, and normal ultra portable laptop use. The Toshiba itself is, IMO, the absolute best of all the tablets. It was certainly built to a higher standard. The Compaq is pretty well built too (a surprise to me). I was very impressed with the way you can detach the slate (screen) from the keyboard. We're using it as the basis of one of our future products. My only real gripe with Compaq is the Crusoe processor which is woefully underpowered. Good battery life or not, it takes way to long to boot and start background apps. However, for our, less processor intensive projects (it will be running some web based apps) it is just fine. The Toshiba with it's 1.3PIII isn't nearly as bad. It has plenty of power for a business laptop. I was surprised by the gaming comment in the original article since not one of these machines were ever intended for such use. Go buy a Dell Insprion 8500 if you want that (an excellent machine in its own right). The biggest gripe I would have is the price. Tablet PCs are dreadfully overpriced IMO.

    I'm not too surprised to see this product being hacked to death on /. This product was never meant for Nerds and Geeks. This is a business machine that will find it's niche with Sales, Marketing, and Management departments, not IT. It is pretty darn decent at doing the job it was built to do.

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  19. Re:How is this better than... by ukoda · · Score: 5, Informative

    For many people the answer will be nothing. In my case I am using a Toshiba Portege 3500 Tablet PC for business meetings and for a couple of papers I am doing at university. It is great. I dock it to a larger monitor and USB I/O for development work and have it dual booting Red Hat 9 as a reasonable Linux laptop but I have to give credit to MS (as much as I hate them) for the journal program.
    It is the journal program and the full paper size that means it can really replace paper for note taking and the trick editing keeps helps deal with lecatures who change their mind about stuff on their white board. I can take notes from my third year engineering maths course better that I could on paper. I have a PocketPC and have used both it ,and the Palm, daily for several years. There is no way they could match a half my paper writing speed and I couldn't draw full blown equations, graphs or diagrams.
    The bottom line is the Tablet PC is the most natural interface I have used and I love every over priced cent of it. Most people won't need the features but if you do it's great.

  20. Re:How long.. by hygelic · · Score: 4, Informative

    ".. can you run one before you need to recharge?"

    My HP/Compaq TC1000 runs for around 2.5 hours with the built in WiFi turned off. Once enabled, depending on my connection rate, I get about 1.5 - 1.75 hours. NOT enough for a day of meetings without a power plug nearby. I'm very disappointed with the battery life on this unit.

    The battery is removable, so I'll be purchasing a spare.

    My friend has the Fujitsu that allows a higher capacity battery, and he routinely sees 3-3.5 hours with WiFi.

  21. Re:How do they hold up? by Octagon+Most · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "How do the screens hold up to human oils? Or the constant pressure of someones wrist on it?"

    Tablet PC screens are not touch-sensitive and thus do not have the layer of flexible, scratchable plastic film that PDAs do. Tablets require the use of their own pen which emits a small magnetic field sensed by the Tablet. Thus the Tablet screen knows when the pen is close. At that point it activates the cursor which you move around with the pen near, but not touching, the screen. Then when the pen actually touches the screen the Tablet activates the on-screen "ink" mode. Since Tablet PCs have much larger screens than a PDA you are likely to have your hand resting on the screen. They are designed for that and your wrist would not affect it.

  22. Is anyone suprised? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As slashnot.com stated:
    "The Viewsonic Tablet PC is an excellent way to pay twice as much for a laptop by removing the keyboard, CD-ROM drive and Floppy."

    Let's face it, Tablet PCs are essentially expensive stripped down laptops. While they might have some very handy specific uses, for the vast majority of people a laptop is a much better solution, i.e., cheaper with more value.

    Microsoft's push for the Tablet PC is an attempt to get people who don't know how to type to buy computers. There are many people who never typed before and are frustrated by computers. The paper/pen metaphor is supposed to appease those people. Unfortunately, anyone who has avoided computers up to now clearly has NO USE for a computer. Especially one that costs SO much!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  23. Re:you just need a p800! by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I actually feel that FAT (the msdos filesystem) is a great filesystem for small removeable media.
    • It's simple, and unlikely to get seriously corrupted when media is rudely removed.
    • It's universal; every OS seems to support it.
    • It supports enough features to make it useful. Long filenames, directory trees, etc.
    • It's efficient; it doesn't waste a lot of space on very small media.

    It may have come from Microsoft, but it's an extremely stable and robust filesystem that is very well understood, and will probably be the de-facto standard for many years.

    As for Mac and PC format floppies, this is not really the issue I was getting it. Macs and PC's used different filesystems on floppies, but the media itself was exactly the same. This is not the case with the multitude of flash memory formats out there.
  24. Let's see, two grand toy you hold in crook of arm. by ahfoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The ones I've seen typically cost more than notebooks. What surprises me is that they had such good sales last year.
    If you're a billionaire who doesn't need to care about dropping a few grand of electronics on the floor every so often, this is a killer toy. No surprise who the poster boy was. But likewise it's no surpise they're not taking the market by storm.

  25. Just scrapped my TabletPC by iceblade · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I bought a Compaq TabletPC last year. I wasn't in search of a problem, I wanted this technology to solve my problems: Non intrusive note-taking with text an graphics mixed during meetings and workshops, store all information in one place where could search for it. Because of the high-end price it should replace my old laptop for business modeling, project planning and presentations.

    My conclusion: A TabletPC is a luxury, but heavy PDA replacement and isn't very usefull as a replacement for a real laptop. Most of the software needs a complete rethinking and the hardware is feeble. So i bought a brand new Apple Powerbook and I'm happy now.

    My detailed experiences with TabletPC Software were: Microsoft XP TabletXP Edition was quite unstable (2 crashes a day), Microsoft Journal works fine, Microsoft OneNote Beta was absolutely not usable (imho wrong concept for a notetaking application), Covey TabletPlanner is ok, but you wouldn't need another Outlook (it works fine on a TabletPC). The absolute KilleApp in the note-taking area is from my point of view Mindjets Mindmanager for TabletPC (good concept, consequent implementation, high value).

    My experiences with Compaq hardware: The TabletPC's connection between main unit and keyboard is very unstable and could be damaged easily. The built-in WLAN connection is very weak, I needed a extra Orinocco WLAN Adapter to get in working in our office. The missing bluetooth adapter is very unconveniend and I see no reason for that (the price couldn't be an argument).

  26. Toshiba's sales are fine by dgenr8 · · Score: 3, Informative

    vendors like Acer and Hewlett-Packard (HP) have even experienced declining sales of the products

    Therein lies the key. Notice that Toshiba isn't mentioned. This is because Toshiba is cleaning their clock! The 3500/3505 has the right mix of features -- mainly processor speed -- and consumers/businesses have figured this out.

    Someone above said a Tablet PC is like a big PDA. Exactly. It replaces your PDA which makes a whole lot more sense than trying to replace your cell phone. I pity anyone who carries all three...

  27. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everyone knows that consumer electronics sales are cyclic. The 4th quarter is usually the hottest (Christmas, etc.), while the 1st quarter is usually the slowest (pay off the credit cards). Even global cell phone sales fell in the first quarter (link)! Granted, they didn't go down as much, but nobody's talking about the demise of the cell phone. (Also, the number cited on the link is for the entire industry. Individual companies may be significantly higher or lower.) Will the tablet PC die? It depends on what the critical mass point is. PDAs aren't for everybody, but they aren't dead, either. The more reasonably priced tablet PCs may end up with sales figures that are 0.5% of PC sales, but that would probably be enough to keep them going. I mean, look at this company.