KDE 3.2, To Be Or Not To Be
Richard Moore writes "As you can see from dot.kde.org, issue #53 of Kernel-Cousin KDE has been released, covering only a single topic. The plan for releasing KDE 3.2 is discussed at length, or maybe that should be KDE 4.0 - who knows..."
I somehow agree, this should be rated informative or something because it is. But since QT also has a free as in freedom licence for their products i'll say it's good, but the fact that they have something non-free as well just prove their lameness, but still. It's like they are following the rules, but they're not.
To say something crazy:
We all know you have nuclear weapons
. Okey, they find them!
We can't.
okey, i need sleep now, but i agree, thats for sure.
I'm not so sure - I prefer to develop in GTK+ because I know I have the flexibility to use my code however I like in the future. My code is currently all GPLed, and I have every intention of maintaining it GPLed, but if there was a good reason down the track to make a closed fork, GTK+ gives me that option.
Result: I use GTK+ for writing Free software.