Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Patents Interactive Entertainment

An anonymous reader writes "Embedded-Watch is carrying a story regarding the award of patent number 6,571,390 to Microsoft. The patent would seem to cover pretty much any implementation of a video-on-demand system that you (or at least I) can think of. Read for yourself to decide whether this patent either is not original work or is blatantly obvious to the most casual observer. The patent could certainly be invalidated by the courts on either point, but that'd take a fight in court that won't be cheap."

15 of 466 comments (clear)

  1. big surprise... by double_plus_ungod · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... from the people who wanted exclusive rights for the common word "windows"

  2. Quick! by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone patent the Blue Screen of Death. Then you can cross license with Microsoft!

  3. I fully expect that MS will be sued by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I fully expect that MS will be sued for infringing on Amazon's patent on patenting obvious things with tons of prior art.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  4. Damn, VOD users will have to pay higher fees! by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... both of them.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  5. Re:Adult Content Industry? by spinlocked · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder what Bill's name would be if he appeared in one of Flynt's works?

    Billy Longhorn.

    --
    # init 5
    Connection closed.


    Oh... ...bugger.
  6. And in related news . . . by CaptainStormfield · · Score: 5, Funny

    The popular geek-news site Slashdot has applied for a patent on alarmist patent stories. One anonymous editor was quoted as saying: "What can we say -- overstating the scope of a patent makes for good news -- it keeps the nerds coming back!"

    --
    "The dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program." - Niven
  7. Re:Blatantly obvious? Grammar nitpick by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 5, Funny
    Something cannot be "blatantly obvious." "Blatant," by definition, is "Offensively obvious." Thus, saying something is "blatantly obvious" is the equivalent of saying it is "offensively obvious obvious." It's like saying "PIN number," or "UPC code."
    I take it you'd prefer "patently obvious" instead? :)
    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  8. Re:Adult Content Industry? by maxpublic · · Score: 5, Funny

    We already know that one: Microsoft!

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  9. Prior "Art" by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hell, I was ordering porn^H^H^H^H"art films" in motels back in the 80's....

  10. Re:WRONG by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Funny

    Read claim 1, the patentable feature is dealing with scroll rates and adding/removingfor a number of listings in a VOD environment. This is not a patent for VOD itself there are several hundred existing patents for that.

    I'm guessing you're new around here. Slashbots don't bother to read articles; they just see the words "Microsoft" and "patent" on the same page and start frothing at the keyboard.

    I've said it a hundred times on here, you can't patent an idea, only the specific implementation of an idea. Patents are all about what seem like minor details, but are actually things that are important, and they've all got very vague, general names. S'why you have to read 'em before commenting.

  11. USP doesn't care about prior art by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 4, Funny
    The software department of the U.S. patent office is a joke, and I doubt prior art has stopped anyone eager enough from getting a patent.

    After all, someones once patented a XOR cursor routine (patent #4,197,590)

    You may be amused, or horrified, by some of these software patent examples. It appears that Europe is not really that much better, something the Patent Horror Gallery explicates.

    So Be Aware: If my karma drops below good, I may issue a patent for a system that karmafies people and then sue the hell out of OSDN ;-)

  12. Re:It's been done before... by BrynM · · Score: 4, Funny

    lawsuite (n):The space in which a lawyer has an office, usually part of a building containing many such offices; see also law firm (the feel of a lawyers perky breast), legalese (the effort to get a lawful patent), litigate (a fence for holding back rabid IP lawyers) and miscarriage-of-justice-den

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  13. Whew! by LittleGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Headline: Microsoft Patents Interactive Entertainment

    *me sweats bullets*

    Summary:The patent would seem to cover pretty much any implementation of a video-on-demand system that you (or at least I) can think of.

    * me breathes sigh of relief *

    For a moment, I though M$ finally had the means to patent the sexual act.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  14. Re:WIMP by beta21 · · Score: 4, Funny

    For a minute there I thought you meant Weakly Interacting Massive Particle

  15. Acronym: WINDOWS by X-wes · · Score: 4, Funny

    When
    I
    Need
    Downtime,
    Operate
    Windows
    Server