Slashdot Mirror
Recommendations for High Volume Color Laser Printers?
dughutch asks: "My church currently uses a small business color laser printer (Minolta 2200), but alas, it can not handle the load of our growing congregation. We are looking at buying a higher volume color laser printer and I wanted to ask the Slashdot readers for any and all information on possible solutions relating to this question, including, but not limited to: cost, volume, repairs, and outsourcing?"
Should be able to get off quite a few ppm of your new kids comic, "Why Dinosaurs Never Existed" with one of those bad boys!
All things in moderation; including moderation
...like to the skies. Maybe your sky-fairy can miracle you up a new printer.
Fucking sissies with their sissy bullshit superstitions shouldn't need to print anyway. Goddamned fools running around with their heads up their collective asses.
USE the BLOOD of CHRIST as your red ink. (This is especially appealing to Muslim "churches" aka terrorist covens).
... Take that black shit out of the incense ball and mix it with water.
USE the BLUE BALLS of CHURCH BOYS everywhere for your blue ink.
Use the URINE the HIPPES dunk the cross in to at art exhibitions for the YELLOW INK.
and finally, for BLACK INK
MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
And to the stupid cult fucker who asked this question, his "growing congregation.." Sounds like cultist propaganda.
Religion is a cult, and your willingness to mold God in your image and your line of thinking is blasphemy. A puny human mind has no ability to characterize GOD, and you motherfuckers do it and that is HYBRIS
your sig says it all. you qoute the matrix reloaded. a piece of shit movie only a retard like yourself would like.
that 404 isnt a joke. do you think you are funny? you arent. people in RL probably vomit when they see a fat sexless live at home nerd geek loser sweaty unwashed cant afford good things in life loser approach them
i want to defecte on your face so bad, man, Sheise your face.
I won't sugarcoat this. This is a very bitter. Small children and the faint of heart should stop reading and leave the room. The rest of this letter is focused exclusively on FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER, not because I harbor any ill-will towards it, but because it wants to conjure up dirt against its fellow human beings. What does it think it is? I mean, if it thinks that it can walk on water, then it's sadly mistaken. I'm merely suggesting that FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER bickers and argues over petty things. I know you're wondering why I just wrote that. I'll explain shortly, but first, I should state that FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER dreams of a time when they'll be free to manipulate everything and everybody. That's the way it's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen -- not may happen, but will happen -- if we don't interfere, if we don't reach the broadest possible audience with the message that I am astonished by how little integrity and good judgment it possesses.
Why FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER would even pretend that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years is beyond me. FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER can blame me for the influx of sick champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine if it makes it feel better, but it won't help its cause any. FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER's flunkies argue that its publications are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. These are the same possession-obsessed beggars who organize a whispering campaign against me. This is no coincidence; FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER not only lies, but it brags about its lying to its factotums. This is not to say that we must remove the misunderstanding that FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world -- not just in the poetic sense, but in the very specific and prosaic terms I am outlining in this letter. It is merely to point out that I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But if FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER were paying attention -- which it would seem it is not, as I've already gone over this -- it'd see that its ideologies all stem from one, simple, faulty premise -- that the majority of heinous thought police are heroes, if not saints. Not surprisingly, FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER spouts the same bile in everything it writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue it's excited about this week is obstructionism, which says to me that it talks a lot about defeatism and how wonderful it is. However, it's never actually defined what it means. How can FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER argue for something it's never defined? This is not a question that we should run away from. Rather, it is something that needs to be addressed quickly and directly, because if the word "calcareoargillaceous" occurs to the reader, he or she may recall that FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER once tried to compromise the things that define us, including integrity, justice, love, and sharing. And here, I maintain, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in its fibs.
There's a little-known truth that isn't readily acknowledged by nerdy deadbeats: In order to convince us that the average working-class person can't see through its chicanery, FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that before bothering us with its next batch of flighty, stingy cajoleries, FROMAN THE ASS PHILANDERER should review the rules of writing a persuas