Slashdot Mirror


Verizon to Reveal Customers in DMCA Subpoena Case

JulisJ writes "NYTimes reports that Verizon will turn over the names of online subscribers accused of swapping music. This could be a big blow to the file-swapping community, even if you're swapping legit." There's also a story on News.com. See our previous story for background.

5 of 470 comments (clear)

  1. Can you blame them? by krisp · · Score: 4, Informative

    If they don't, it's their asses on the lines for obstruction of justice.

  2. Didja get the memo, Peter? Re:I'm kinda curious by bourne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Do these people who are being identified know who they are?

    Let's me do some extensive research for you...

    (reads article)

    Yes, they do:

    "Ms. Deutsch said Verizon had already informed the two people whose information is the subject of its lawsuits against the recording industry group. The group has filed two additional subpoenas, and those subscribers have also been informed that their names are to be divulged."

  3. Senator writing bill to oppose this sort of thing by Phoenix666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I submitted this story earlier today, but it didn't make it. Basically, Sen. Sam Brownback from Kansas is announcing the "Consumer,Schools, and Libraries Digital Rights Management Awareness Act," which will, among other things, require that a copyright holder win a lawsuit in order to obtain the name of an alleged peer-to-peer pirate.

    In the meantime, I say turn about's fair play: let's all of us accuse the RIAA of illegally distributing our copyrighted material and invade their privacy without bothering with the courts. Let's rat out every music executive out there who's downloading kiddie porn or sending naughty emails to their mistresses. Hey, if they can do it to us, why can't we do it to them?

    my 2 cents...

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  4. Re:My boss sent me this via email today ... by ckokotay · · Score: 5, Informative

    Stop calling it 'stealing', it is copyright infringement. Why the hell do you people have such a hard time understanding that concept?

    To 'steal', you take someones tangible good/property. Now you have it, they do not - you have deprived them of their property. Not so with so-called IP. You copy it, and they still have their own copy. Now if you were take a CD, say from a store - you have 'stolen' something tangible - but you have not committed copyright infringement under the law. Curiously, the penalty for swiping a CD is leagues lower than trading a song on the internet.

    People sound so stupid and uneducated when they make posts such as yours. Get your facts and definitions straight before you blurt it out.

    --
    It does not matter what you do, it's wrong.
  5. Re:What is Hillary Rosen's home address? by vsprintf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hilary Rosen resigned. you ought to at least target someone who's still employed by the RIAA.

    She announced she will resign at the end of 2003. She is still employed by the RIAA.