Slashdot Mirror


Unreal Tournament 2K4 First Look

Thanks to an anonymous reader for pointing to a Gamespot first look at Unreal Tournament 2K4, which comes with the first 3 official screenshots of Epic's PC FPS. This title includes much of the goodness in UT2K3, "as well as new game modes, huge new maps, and controllable air, land, and space vehicles", and Gamespot mentions that one of the screens "provides a look at the space flyer in the assault mode, while the other two show scenes from the onslaught mode, which will take place in giant outdoor environments."

41 comments

  1. awesome by qed123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those look very nice. I hope 2004 ships with Linux support out of the box, like 2003.

  2. How many UT games will come out before by mhesseltine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Duke Nukem' Forever finally makes it?

    Bad joke aside, UT2k3 and UT II just came out fairly recently, and there are still people creating maps, mutators, etc. for them. Hopefully this won't steal too much thunder from the UT2k3 and UT II camps, since there's still lots of good gameplay left there.

    P.S. Slashcode continues to be broken. Either fix the headers for games on the frontpage, or, apply the color schemes to all the other headlines. In fact, that might be kind of cool. BSD headlines in red, Apple in the Aqua theme, etc.

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:How many UT games will come out before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "UT II" that you speak of?

    2. Re:How many UT games will come out before by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      Unreal II the awakening. I stand corrected. Same engine though.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  3. UT2K4 / Q3TA? by thamaht · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This reminds me entirely too much of Quake 3: Team Arena, which flopped horribly. (Not Quake 3: Arena, but the other, crappier one.) It looks to be the same engine with more maps/characters/vehicles (IIRC there was the capability in the UT2K3/U2 engine for that, but it was never done..), and a little facelift. That formula doesn't work well for first person shooters, though..

    1. Re:UT2K4 / Q3TA? by jpr1nd · · Score: 5, Informative

      you're correct about the vehicles, there is a small vehicle demo hidden in UT2K3 that i'm sure most people know about. if not, open the console in UT2K3 and type 'open vehicledemo' (w/o the quotes, of course) to drive around a volcanic looking area in some sort of buggy contraption. fun.

    2. Re:UT2K4 / Q3TA? by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Epic's idea was to make the UT line like sports games, with a new release each year (though iirc UT2k3 was late). The problem with this idea, though, is that they really don't have anything to drive the yearly releases the way sports games do (adding new players and updating stats).

      Personally, I prefer to buy sports titles shortly after the new version comes out (buying the older version), because they're dirt cheap and there's usually little change between each year's title (it's only over the long term that the biggest changes happen, and even then the first year of a new feature is not usually the best year for that feature). If UT keeps up this format, I may simply do the same thing here, especially since I prefer playing against the bots for the most part anyway.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  4. 2K4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The article was about Ultimate Tournament 2004. What's this 2K4 you're talking about?

    No, this is not a troll. Maybe you meant 2k4 instead of 2K4. Please note that 2k4 == 2400 != 2004.

    1. Re:2K4? by jpr1nd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well it's actually _Unreal_ Tournament, and if you're going to be picky about the 2KX formula for naming games you may have to start off with (just about) every sports game released since 2001

  5. Warthog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Halo? UT2k4? Missing something here, like a press release?

    Maybe we'll be able to play with the Halo Online Kids!

    Rumor Rumor Rumor!

    1. Re:Warthog? by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      Hay, it's just like they released Halo for the PC, EXCEPT IT HASN'T BEEN ON XBOX FOR LIKE A JILLION YEARS.

      Jesus Christ, if they EVER expect to ship Halo for the PC, then sales will be abysmal. Everyone that wanted it has already played it on Xbox.

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
    2. Re:Warthog? by samael · · Score: 1

      I know nobody with an x-box.

      I know about 15 people with PCs.

      At least 4 of them want to play Halo...

    3. Re:Warthog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably an exception, there, d00der.

    4. Re:Warthog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know anyone with an x-box and I'd like to play halo. Chalk me up for another exception

  6. Halo ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Looks like a warthog to me...

  7. Screens so important by Lust · · Score: 1

    With all the chat about new releases needing good plot and game play to differentiate themselves, why do we still feel the need to drool over bleeding-edge screenshots? I still prefer Tribes2 to any recent games like UT2k3 or RtCW-ET, but damn if these new shots aren't great. Gotta hate human nature.

  8. Random Tidbits by Drakino · · Score: 4, Informative

    Random tidbits from my visit to E3 and seeing UT2K4:

    1. It's completly backwards compatible with UT2K3. Any mod for UT2K3 works in 2K4.

    2. Atari is planning some sort of rebate for existing 2K3 owners, but no details were announced at E3.

    3. 2K4 adds more content to the game then what 2K3 shipped with.

    4. This still uses the same engine as 2K3, with some tweaks.

    5. There are no plans currently for a UT2K5. 2K4 exists due to so much new content being developed for the game. More then they were willing to release as free bonus packs.

  9. In other news... by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Sega sues the hell out of Epic for stealing their '2K' naming system.

    Film at eleven.

    --
    I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
    1. Re:In other news... by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno about anybody else, but I wish everybody would knock it off with the retarded 2k(yourmom) naming scheme for everything. I think the real Y2K bug was that it was supposed to happen 3.5 years ago and people still won't let that fscking buzzword die.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    2. Re:In other news... by Omestes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh, k = 1000. 2k4 2000 + 4 = 2004. Not quite a buzz word, being that it is correct notation. Y2k was pure buzzword.

      Also officially Ut2k3 is Unreal Tournament 2003, so it just user shortening, jus' like typing MS to be Microsoft, IE6 being Internet Explorer 6.**. Geeks like acronyms, alot. With all our big nasty RAMs, ROMs, MP3s, MMORPGS, MUDs, BMPs, etc etc... Saying "Unreal Tournament 2003" is cumbersome, saying "YOO TEE TWO Kay THREE" is easier.

      Back OT (on topic), I'm miffed at Epic/Atari/whatnot for this. I just forked over my $50 for UT2k3 (unreal tournament two thousand and three), and now I'm expected to fork over ANOTHER $50 for the same damn game. Change content as much as you want, I didn't really buy it for content, I bought it because it was a really pretty engine. I don't (do not)think a minor engine update, and some inhouse mods (modifications) are really worth another chunk of cash. Why not remake Unreal2, except make it better, that might be worth my money.

      I mean that $50 is already slotted for Frozen Throne and the Morrowind expansion, not for a game I already have two copies of. (UT, and UT2k3 (unreal tournament, and unreal tournament two thousand and three).

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    3. Re:In other news... by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      But what the hell's wrong with UT2003? You don't sound like a media-absorbed luser then...

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    4. Re:In other news... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Nobody's forcing you to buy UT2k4...

      if you think it's worth the money at the time, then buy it.
      Otherwise, don't.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    5. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Eh, k = 1000. 2k4 2000 + 4 = 2004. Not quite a buzz word, being that it is correct notation.

      Except that if the notation is consistant, the 4 is multiplied, not added. so 2k4 should equal 8000.

    6. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just download it of KAZAA you whiney bitch! Like everyone else.

    7. Re:In other news... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Yes they will be. Being that I really like 3rd party scenes, and I'm sure that while UT2k+4 is going to be backwards compatable with UT2k+3, UT2k+3 isn't going to be forwards compatable. Meaning I'll have that "left out" feeling in the modding community. That and it will decrease some of the online players pool, meanining that there will be EVEN LESS people setting up invasion servers.

      This is the sae reason I ended up buying every Sims expansion through HotDate, I needed them to download all the good (better than 1st party, in most cases) 3rd party items. When I refused to buy a single expansion, then cruised one of the fan sites looking for items, I always wanted the ones that needed the newest Sims Expansion.

      Same thing for UT2k+4, I'm sure.

      I just hope that the Unreal franchise doesn't do the Windows thing, starting slow, then spamming the user with rushed releases.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  10. Makes me glad i DIDNT buy UT2003 by bmnc · · Score: 1

    I might actually buy this one, as I like the idea of space vehicles etc... I hope they've cleaned up the physics first though.

    1. Re:Makes me glad i DIDNT buy UT2003 by weicco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bought UT2003 and what a horrible mistake I made. I had to eat macarones rest of the month and what did I get from it... Stupid game that doesn't run on my computer (Duron 1200, Ati 8500LE).

      Graphics was supposed to be awesome, at least somebody said so back then. Well maybe they were, but all those fancy details and flashing things made the whole screen to look really confusing. I couldn't tell what part of the screen was supposed to be a wall and where the enemy was :) I hope UT2004 does a better job on this one and I have the money to buy better PC so I'm able to play it (if I win a lottery).

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    2. Re:Makes me glad i DIDNT buy UT2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The game was really boring too. Boring figures, weapons and maps.

    3. Re:Makes me glad i DIDNT buy UT2003 by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1
      I couldn't tell what part of the screen was supposed to be a wall and where the enemy was
      get the latest patch and use the new "bright skins"-setting -> problem solved
      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    4. Re:Makes me glad i DIDNT buy UT2003 by Miles · · Score: 1

      But when you're playing invasion at wave >= 9, you don't have too much time to look at the figures, maps and weapons.

    5. Re:Makes me glad i DIDNT buy UT2003 by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I played UT2K3 on a 1GHz Athlon with an ATI Radeon 8500DV card and it played fine. Sure, I couldn't play at uber-high resolutions or with all the features maxed out, but it played just fine.

      I just recently upgraded to an XP 2500+ with a ATI 9700 Pro and now I *can* play at uber-high resolutions with all the settings maxed out.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    6. Re:Makes me glad i DIDNT buy UT2003 by weicco · · Score: 1

      This proves pretty much my point. Why bring game to market that no-one is able to play with full details? Whole computer market is dragging behind these stupid games that are supposed to work better when you buy Multimega++ GHz computers. With little optimization those games can be run on "normal" PCs. Maybe Intel is sponsoring the whole game development business :)

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
  11. UT2k4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe you saw this game when it was called tribes2

    1. Re:UT2k4 by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2

      Maybe you saw this game when it was called tribes2

      My thoughts exactly, except the graphics are slightly prettier. T2 was one game with huge replay value.. I still play it regularly after almost two years. If this new UT game plays as good as it looks, they should have a winner on their hands.

  12. Looks promising... by chriskenrick · · Score: 1

    If they implement this well, it should be a great game. Assault was one of the most missed features when UT2003 came out, so I'm not that surprised to see it back. If the upgrade price from UT2003 is reasonable, it should be a hit.

  13. so this is basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tribes 2 done right (as in: network code that doesn't suck, but after playing ET a couple of times, UT2k3's network code looks sucky in comparison; a terrain engine that really scales). I wonder what the AI is like. Tribes 2 had a very steep requirements list for its time in order to have halfway decent AI -- and it wasn't really that hot.

  14. Got UT2k3? by smg_mrBlonde · · Score: 0

    I already bought UT2003 in january,iÂm not going to buy mods and vehicles! I'm saving my money to buy Half Life2/Doom3.

  15. Obligitory Anti-Piracy rant by Omestes · · Score: 1

    I will not download it through Kazaa, for two reasons. The first (and practicle reason) is that I'm stuck at 26k right now. I have no idea why. I just moved into a new apartment complex, and the fasted dial-up speed I can get is 26400. I spent a whole night that I should have been unpacking boxes messing with my network settings... Damn erfwink. So download UT2k+4 would take a week and a half to download. It summer, free bandwidth isn't available for another 3 months, when I get to play with that nice ph4t T1 again.

    Now the big ethereal ethical reason; I support Epic/Atari. The Unreal series of games has been very good, and I have gleamed much enjoyment from them. And being that I like the product, and would play it obsesivly, I'll pay for it. I view buying a product like voting, if it is good it gets my vote, if not, it doesn't. My vote being my hard-earned cash. Now I'm not completely against piracy, I've pirated some utilities (and an OS) in the past, just because I'd only use it once, and that it wasn't quite the software of choice. Sometimes I pirate because prices are too high, I can't afford a $300 peice of software, so I hit up kazaa, or search astalavista. But for things I want, and can afford, I buy.

    Also, buying it more convenient.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    1. Re:Obligitory Anti-Piracy rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Troll!