Slashdot Mirror


Latest SCO News

SCO has discovered an amendment to their contract with Novell that may clarify that they did purchase the copyright to System V after all. Heise has an interview in German with a former employee. Cringely says SCO probably was responsible for any duplicated code itself, with a theory that is quite plausible. One non-programmer corporate analyst has looked at SCO's alleged evidence. And SCO has another press conference today.

4 of 683 comments (clear)

  1. awesome quote by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ok, its at the end when cringley changes topics to AOL, but I love this quote:

    "AOL's increasingly shabby treatment of people like me is one of the reasons their results are in a tailspin," said my friend.ï½ "And as they auger in, I'll be rooting for the ground."

    I'm right there with you man. Where do I get the T-shirt?

  2. Help me out here... by evilviper · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm not sure... Would this be a dupe? Same back-and-fourth, with absolutely no substance, as the last 500 freaking /. stories about SCO.

    Excuse me, I have to visit my prefs to exclude Caldera stories. I just wish there was a Cringly and NY Times category as well...

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  3. Re:Reverse the burden of proof by ffallen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Because I'm a first slashdot post cheesy newbie. Because I'm a first slashdot post cheesy newbie. Because I'm a first slashdot post cheesy newbie. And I don't validate self worth by "ratings" on the web. Even from a source as interesting as slashdot. More coffee pls :)

  4. Trust the users? by AmoebafromSweden · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The article lists one of the features being:
    a biometric room safe that uses a thumbprint as the lock and key

    Ok, what do they do if the guest leaves without reseting the safe?

    Or do they have someway to open the safe without the guests thumbprint. Do they not eliminate the purpose of the safe then?