Outstanding Objects (Developed Dirt Cheap)
Mark Leighton Fisher writes "Some readers might be interested in
Outstanding Objects (Developed Dirt Cheap); or "Why Don't Developers Search the Literature?" It seems like I still see a lot of wheel reinvention going on, even with the wealth of code and information now available on the Net."
I wasn't aware that AC/DC was involved in software development till now.
4) You may get sued by SCO.
1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
---
I read your email...
Who is John Galt?
I always hit the net before emarking on coding. There's no way I'm gonna spend 6 hours throwing together code that someone else has spent 20 lovingly moulding for me :-) I just too damn lazy... What can I say, Wally is my hero :-)
-- Gaxx
Done Dirt Cheap.
Well, of course, my way IS better.
We reinvent the wheel because new wheels look sexy, not because they roll any better.
I have absolutely no idea whether there's a point to be proved with that, but it's kinda interesting.
2. They are taught the complete spectrum of software development from function to complete program. So they think that they can do it all reallllly well.
3. They don't get in the habit when they start.
4. They get paid by the hour not the thought. (sorry thats an old lawyer joke.)
I would say that about 30% of the code in use in my organization is from freely available sources, and used with total disregard to any license it was available under.
Most of us are lazy by nature.
I completely disagree. As a matter of fact, I have an article that totally disproves this, but I don't feel like finding it right now.
Maybe after my nap.
Best Windows Freeware
I agree. But my way is BEST.
This is the first time I have ever seen a tagline of this form that I could agree with and feel was a reasonable statement. Aren't these supposed to be ridiculously overstated?
Well, you see, it was because I was running late on one of my programming projects and so I decided to um...reuse code I found online. Found a site of someone calling himself the BOFH which seemed like a catchy acronym so I dug around for some of his code snippets.
He went on about how it was great to put comments on code (which was something our instructor told us was a good thing(TM) so instant credibility!!!)
So I proceeded to borrow his comments too -- even though I wasn't sure how rm -rf * was supposed to mean "remark."
Aaaand this is why I don't borrow source code anymore.
here here!
and if you can't shoot your foot off (C) how are you going to blow your whole leg off (C++).
And if you can't think of a good reason to do that... well, I think the phrase girly-man was invoked!!
-C++ Troll
Some of the best code reuse I've seen is in Microsoft products. On my Win2k PC I have about 20 copies of 5 different versions of MSVCRT*.DLL. Previous versions of Windows had similar reuse of VBRUN*.DLL.