Slashdot Mirror


Study on Internet Censorship in Germany

An anonymous reader writes "There is a report on Germany forcing ISPs to censor the Internet by faking DNS entries. ISPs also seem to use this to steal mail and generally screw up the Internet. Next thing they plan is using BGP to break routing to unwanted webservers. Scary."

3 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. No no no... by FroMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have it all wrong. It must be the US that is doing this. We know the US is the source of all censorship.

    </sarcasm>

    I love how everytime folks dislike a law (many of them bad) declare that they are going to move to Canada or Europe where freedoms really mean something.

    Well, lets see. Strike out Germany, they censor the web. Strike out France, they also prevent auctions on WWII artifacts. England with their video cameras and national ID cards are out.

    To tell the truth, I found I was able to get the the stormfront site that one of the links mentioned. Why? I live in the US. While we do have freedom issues here, I don't think they are quite the same as many other countries.

    Here, you are allowed to go against popular ideas. You can be a racist if you like. You can hate whites, blacks, anyone you want. You can hate the government or current administration.

    In the US you are able to create your own website and report any news you like. Infact, you can go to any website you wish, and you will actually get there (barring internet routing problems). The government isn't going to force ISPs to route around you.

    While many of the reactionary laws from 9/11 are causing problems, we have Ashcroft fighting to keep those laws on the books. You know why? Because, they are not permanent, there was a sunset clause put into the law. You know what else? Ashcroft isn't having an easy go at it.

    So, next time that you want to throw a temper tantrum that the US is removing your freedoms, keep in mind we could do much worse. We could be making it so you could not go to German sites or French sites or muslim sites or Christian sites.

    This isn't to say we should have these PATRIOT acts and such, but here we have the power and ability to fight laws like that. I think our energy is best used in that fashion, not whining how some other country that has a good law here or there but also has some other horrible laws.

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    1. Re:No no no... by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [US govt doesn't] decide what you eat,

      As long as it isn't one of the many forbidden herbs, in which case you could go to jail.

      where you work,

      Unless you want to work for a government contractor and happen to enjoy the aforementioned forbidden herbs. All government contractors are required to give drug tests.

      Or maybe you want to conduct business on Sunday, or sell alcohol, things that are still forbidden in many areas.

      what entertainment you are allowed

      Unless you want to:

      Have anal or oral sex (in most states)
      Have sex before marriage
      Be homosexual
      Hire a prostitute
      Watch porn on broadcast TV
      Smoke a joint in the privacy of your own home
      Crack a commercial DRM product
      Trade music online
      Light a bonfire (california emissions laws) ....

      I mostly agree with you, things aren't too bad here, things are a lot worse in some aspects in some other countries. That doesn't mean there aren't severe limitations on what is allowed and what is not.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  2. Re:What's all this then? by amorsen · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You should not necessarily be surprised that the Germans accept blocking of neo-nazi sites without much discussion. I may be wrong since I am not from Germany but from Denmark, but anything related to nazism seems to be almost as offensive to a German as child pornography is. Imagine that there were sites with child-pornography operating openly in some other country. Do you think the US providers would be told by the government to block access to those sites? And do you think any civil rights group would raise more than a murmur over this, apart from perhaps issuing a report about how badly the blocking is implemented?

    In any case, such blocking is interesting from a technical viewpoint. Doing it in DNS is easy and it scales well, but it is also easy to circumvent. Doing it by inserting a black hole route in BGP is easy for the first couple, but routers will not be able to handle an unlimited number of /32 blackhole routes. As long as the router does not melt, it is a pretty effective method. There are other methods, but they all suck in at least one way.

    And then someone invented Freenet. Practically impossible to block. It will be interesting to see which country that will be the first to make it illegal.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?