Greplaw Interviews Phil Zimmermann
LawGeek writes "The venerable GrepLaw crew has struck again, this time with Editor Mikael Pawlo interviewing PGP author and all-around encryption expert Phil Zimmermann. Pawlo discussed a number of topics with Zimmerman, including the current state of encryption export laws, DRM, and activism against erosion of privacy both in the U.S. and internationally. The interview is here."
fp suckaz!
See Phill's official web site
The best solution to Muslim women is to rape a bit of white into them.
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
Nothing's wrong with it to the general public. But since slashdot (and geeks in general, it seems) are so fucking paranoid, any article that refers to such technology will instantly put a bad spin on it.
/. crowd is also too lazy to get off their fat asses and do anything about the things they argue so strongly against.
Too bad the
Maybe someone should rape a bit of America into YOU.
Yeah, but they'd have to ask CmdrTaco to remove his cock first.
Wow, michael, it only took you two tries to post a greplaw interview that does *not* read like a rejected script fragment from "Clueless".
Actually in my experience compasses do in fact, fail.
Please elaborate.
The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
The quote from the interview: "Could they have been an alternative for PGP instead of making it freeware?"
The reply: "There is a place for products under different licenses. There is a place for products under the GNU GPL, also cryptographic products. However, GNU GPL is not enough for everyoneâ(TM)s needs. Some software needs to be sold for profit. Some software can not depend on hobby-programming conducted on weekends and other spare-time by programmers having other day-jobs. There is a place for that. But PGP needs more focused development than that."
"Hobby-programming"? spare-time programmers?
No. A Fucking Idiot.
that's not PGP! It's GPG! You troll!
Repeat after me:
Some software needs to be sold for profit.
Some software needs to be sold for profit.
Some software needs to be sold for profit.
Some software needs to be sold for profit.
Therefore,
1) Write some software.
2) Sell software for profit.
3) PROFIT!
Hooray.