Posted by
ryuzaki0
on from the to-an-independant-analyst dept.
cheesybagel writes "In this EETimes article SCO claims to have shown their evidence to our independent analyst friends from the Aberdeen Group. The evidence, all 80 lines of it, allegedly even has identical comments."
MAKE IT ALL STOP!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: -1, Flamebait
Well, SCO is *still* not out of cash... aparantly. So, for them to stop, they need to run out first. Since they have to pay for bandwidth... I guess using a little wouldn't hurt.
So, got bandwidth? Mad at SCO? Want to learn more about their products and/or hear them talk? Last time they pulled the file when slashdot wanted to know how to administrate their Linux server. This time...
Download a 36.6mb ZIP from the SCO Authorized Eduaction Partner program from here
(for all you non-English speakers)
a 12.9mb Italian OpenLinux manual pdf from here
a 10mb Unixware administration pdf from here
a 7.9mb mp3 of a Caldera confrence call (May 2002) from here
a 4.2mb mp3 of a SCO confrence call from here
a 4.5mb vector image of the Caldera logo from here
OR
a 6.8mb SCO education Linux courseware pdf from here
a 128mb iso evaluation of the SCOoffice 'Volution' product from here
***If you want to get these interesting files easier, you can also launch an unspecified number of wget processes. You can even -O/dev/null them if you don't want to use disk space, but still want to download them...
36.6mb: (removing the space in 'zip')
wget sco.com/images/pdf/education/SCO_AEP_posterfiles.z ip
12.9mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/edesktop/edesktop_24_it.pdf
10mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/aep/UW7NET~1.PDF
7.9mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/06032002.mp3
4.2mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/q2.mp3
5.4mb:
wget http://www.sco.de/images/pdf/12-11-01.mp3
9mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/aep/OS5NET~1.PDF
4mb:
wget sco.de/images/pdf/unixware/946000000b.pdf
And, if you need their entire website for offline viewing... not wanting to waste bandwidth downloading things multiple times:
wget -r -l0 http://www.sco.com/
Re:Sarcasm mode on
by
aborchers
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
That 80 lines took five minutes of developers precious time!
I acknowledge your humor, and agree in your assessment of SCO, but:
80 lines in 5 minutes? I can only assume you are not a software engineer...
Re:Has anybody considered
by
Lew+Payne
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
You're full of shit, too. The complaint sounding in tort (the lawsuit, for you dummies) will be very clear as to what the infringements are. SCO has not contradicted itself, because when it comes to legal action, only the complaint can speak for SCO. Get a grip, you jerky little kids.
They don't have to prove anything to the Linux community, you moron. Though you'd like to think of yourselves as Gods, you're just a flock of fools, who baste in the comfort of having other fools for company. All SCO has to do is prove (not even beyond a reasonable doubt) in court that their code was copied. I've got news for you drummer boy... the jury doesn't give a shit what you or the Linux community think. When the time comes, I'm sure SCO will have one of its code geeks file a declaration stating that he/she wrote the code themselves. At that point, it's up to the defense to prove otherwise. You people are so blind... so narrow-minded... so brainwashed.
Re:Use SCO's Bandwidth
by
Lew+Payne
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
You're a stupid and childish little shit-head. I am always amazed at the crap-heads that infest this and other forums.
Why don't you try doing something positive, for a change. Just because you don't like the fact that a company is making use of the legal process to protect its intellectual rights doesn't mean you need to encourage others to cause damage.
What about legitimate people who want to make use of their products? It's idiots like you, who haven't a clue as to the ramifications or repercussions of their stupid actions, that cause others needless grief and suffering.
Grow up, you stupid imbecile.
I submitted this story first....
by
nirbasito
·
· Score: -1, Flamebait
please translate the following to uppercase letters (because I AM YELLINGGG!!!)
i submitted this same story 3 days back to slashdot and it was rejected by slashdot moderators.Here is my submission result in case someone wants to check it up:
2003-06-06 05:23:23 Laura Dood finds SCO's evidence "convincing"(articles,linux) (rejected)
Now why is this??? I submitted the story but it was rejected while someone with an yankee sounding name...when he submitted the story it was focking accepted.
Though I know/. is an amerikan thing but let me tell you fucking moron yankee amerikans that you deserve nothing better than Microsoft. Because you are the one to take credit and avoid blame all the time.....Fock u all
Well, SCO is *still* not out of cash... aparantly. So, for them to stop, they need to run out first. Since they have to pay for bandwidth... I guess using a little wouldn't hurt. So, got bandwidth? Mad at SCO? Want to learn more about their products and/or hear them talk? Last time they pulled the file when slashdot wanted to know how to administrate their Linux server. This time... Download a 36.6mb ZIP from the SCO Authorized Eduaction Partner program from here (for all you non-English speakers) a 12.9mb Italian OpenLinux manual pdf from here a 10mb Unixware administration pdf from here a 7.9mb mp3 of a Caldera confrence call (May 2002) from here a 4.2mb mp3 of a SCO confrence call from here a 4.5mb vector image of the Caldera logo from here OR a 6.8mb SCO education Linux courseware pdf from here a 128mb iso evaluation of the SCOoffice 'Volution' product from here ***If you want to get these interesting files easier, you can also launch an unspecified number of wget processes. You can even -O /dev/null them if you don't want to use disk space, but still want to download them...
36.6mb: (removing the space in 'zip')
wget sco.com/images/pdf/education/SCO_AEP_posterfiles.z ip
12.9mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/edesktop/edesktop_24_it.pdf
10mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/aep/UW7NET~1.PDF
7.9mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/06032002.mp3
4.2mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/q2.mp3
5.4mb:
wget http://www.sco.de/images/pdf/12-11-01.mp3
9mb:
wget sco.com/images/pdf/aep/OS5NET~1.PDF
4mb:
wget sco.de/images/pdf/unixware/946000000b.pdf
And, if you need their entire website for offline viewing... not wanting to waste bandwidth downloading things multiple times:
wget -r -l0 http://www.sco.com/
I acknowledge your humor, and agree in your assessment of SCO, but:
80 lines in 5 minutes? I can only assume you are not a software engineer...
Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
You're full of shit, too. The complaint sounding in tort (the lawsuit, for you dummies) will be very clear as to what the infringements are. SCO has not contradicted itself, because when it comes to legal action, only the complaint can speak for SCO. Get a grip, you jerky little kids.
They don't have to prove anything to the Linux community, you moron. Though you'd like to think of yourselves as Gods, you're just a flock of fools, who baste in the comfort of having other fools for company. All SCO has to do is prove (not even beyond a reasonable doubt) in court that their code was copied. I've got news for you drummer boy... the jury doesn't give a shit what you or the Linux community think. When the time comes, I'm sure SCO will have one of its code geeks file a declaration stating that he/she wrote the code themselves. At that point, it's up to the defense to prove otherwise. You people are so blind... so narrow-minded... so brainwashed.
You're a stupid and childish little shit-head. I am always amazed at the crap-heads that infest this and other forums.
Why don't you try doing something positive, for a change. Just because you don't like the fact that a company is making use of the legal process to protect its intellectual rights doesn't mean you need to encourage others to cause damage.
What about legitimate people who want to make use of their products? It's idiots like you, who haven't a clue as to the ramifications or repercussions of their stupid actions, that cause others needless grief and suffering.
Grow up, you stupid imbecile.
please translate the following to uppercase letters (because I AM YELLINGGG!!!) i submitted this same story 3 days back to slashdot and it was rejected by slashdot moderators.Here is my submission result in case someone wants to check it up: 2003-06-06 05:23:23 Laura Dood finds SCO's evidence "convincing"(articles,linux) (rejected) Now why is this??? I submitted the story but it was rejected while someone with an yankee sounding name ...when he submitted the story it was focking accepted.
Though I know /. is an amerikan thing but let me tell you fucking moron yankee amerikans that you deserve nothing better than Microsoft. Because you are the one to take credit and avoid blame all the time.....Fock u all