Posted by
ryuzaki0
on from the to-an-independant-analyst dept.
cheesybagel writes "In this EETimes article SCO claims to have shown their evidence to our independent analyst friends from the Aberdeen Group. The evidence, all 80 lines of it, allegedly even has identical comments."
HALO. I AM GNU TO THA INTARWEB
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: -1, Troll
plS cud u tel me whare i can get UNIXWAREZ from SCO i here it is da best distro for lunix n00bs and they are da originalzzz thxxxxxxxxx. also shouts to da west side niggs peace to da crips!!
I knew it!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: -1, Troll
Attack when you see the whites of their eyes.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: -1, Troll
Once the dust clears, I charge each and every one of you to turn and tear SCO to pieces by all means in your power. Turn this diseased corporate vehicle into a pile of rubble. Do not do this with namecalling or verbal abuse. Use your portfolios to sell their stock short. Rid your companies and clients of all of their software by giving Linux-based solutions free to their licensees. Influence your employers not to hire any of their refugees. In this way, you will create a public spectacle equal only to the spurious rise and fall of the "creator of Linux" VA Software, an NT hardware house that abused the other side of the coin. Exercise your personal power and participate. It will be fun. Demonstrate the real power of the Linux community. But remember, wait until the moment it is resolved. Promote this sentiment to all of your friends. Say no more of this plan. Just do it.
Linus Torvalds is a fucking whore
by
Suicide+Bomberman
·
· Score: -1, Troll
Harry Potter dies at the end of Harry Potter and the philosipher's stone reloaded. FUCK YOU!
-- I put my hand in my pocket What do I feel?One hundred and ten stories Of concrete and steel
Re:Two previous post provide sufficient defense...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: -1, Troll
5000/20000000 = 0.25 % not 0.0025 %
Sorry, this guy can't count - next one, please...
Re:Has anybody considered
by
ClosedSource
·
· Score: 0, Troll
So first SCO is at fault for not showing any evidence. Now that they have, the claim is that they can't prove the code is theirs. If the Linux community wasn't going to accept code as evidence, why ask for it in the first place?
In your post you are asking why this code, that you don't believe is valid evidence, be made public. Why should SCO bother? Besides, copied or not, you already have it. Just look in the Linux source.
Re:Has anybody considered
by
ClosedSource
·
· Score: 0, Troll
I should have said "isn't made public" instead of "be made public"
Re:Mac OSX based on Linux?
by
Lew+Payne
·
· Score: 0, Troll
Get your basic comprehension skills straight, geek boy...
"The article also claims that Mac OSX is just as vulnerable to attacks as any other Linux based system."
They didn't say it was based on Linux, you mental midget. They said it was just as vulnerable to attacks as any other Linux based system. It's in the same league as Linux when it comes to vulnerabilities. Is that so difficult for your programmatic little mind to comprehend?
You're a short-sighted idiot, too. Boy, I am certainly finding my share of mindless fools in this particular story.
It's not about any decent programmer writing 80 lines of code -- that won't cure the damage already done by distributing proprietary code. You will also be hard pressed to have a programmer replace those lines of code, under a "clean-room" environment. Don't know what that means, as it pertains to intellectual property, geek boy? Better find out.
RE: Your offtopic troll
by
g_bit
·
· Score: 0, Troll
1.) You're an idiot.
2.) Do you think that your sub-average IQ friends could run linux without breaking something? No.
Slashdot Mirror
plS cud u tel me whare i can get UNIXWAREZ from SCO i here it is da best distro for lunix n00bs and they are da originalzzz thxxxxxxxxx. also shouts to da west side niggs peace to da crips!!
That ASCII anus WAS SCO's cre\ation!
Once the dust clears, I charge each and every one of you to turn and tear SCO to pieces by all means in your power. Turn this diseased corporate vehicle into a pile of rubble. Do not do this with namecalling or verbal abuse. Use your portfolios to sell their stock short. Rid your companies and clients of all of their software by giving Linux-based solutions free to their licensees. Influence your employers not to hire any of their refugees. In this way, you will create a public spectacle equal only to the spurious rise and fall of the "creator of Linux" VA Software, an NT hardware house that abused the other side of the coin. Exercise your personal power and participate. It will be fun. Demonstrate the real power of the Linux community. But remember, wait until the moment it is resolved. Promote this sentiment to all of your friends. Say no more of this plan. Just do it.
Harry Potter dies at the end of Harry Potter and the philosipher's stone reloaded. FUCK YOU!
I put my hand in my pocket
What do I feel?One hundred and ten stories
Of concrete and steel
5000/20000000 = 0.25 % not 0.0025 %
...
Sorry, this guy can't count - next one, please
So first SCO is at fault for not showing any evidence. Now that they have, the claim is that they can't prove the code is theirs. If the Linux community wasn't going to accept code as evidence, why ask for it in the first place?
In your post you are asking why this code, that you don't believe is valid evidence, be made public. Why should SCO bother? Besides, copied or not, you already have it. Just look in the Linux source.
I should have said "isn't made public" instead of "be made public"
Get your basic comprehension skills straight, geek boy...
"The article also claims that Mac OSX is just as vulnerable to attacks as any other Linux based system."
They didn't say it was based on Linux, you mental midget. They said it was just as vulnerable to attacks as any other Linux based system. It's in the same league as Linux when it comes to vulnerabilities. Is that so difficult for your programmatic little mind to comprehend?
You're a short-sighted idiot, too. Boy, I am certainly finding my share of mindless fools in this particular story.
It's not about any decent programmer writing 80 lines of code -- that won't cure the damage already done by distributing proprietary code. You will also be hard pressed to have a programmer replace those lines of code, under a "clean-room" environment. Don't know what that means, as it pertains to intellectual property, geek boy? Better find out.
2.) Do you think that your sub-average IQ friends could run linux without breaking something? No.