Slashdot Mirror


Java/Script Alert: Cross-Platform Browser Vulnerability

Ant writes "Synopsis: Opera, Mozilla & Netscape with javascript enabled are vulnerable to remote command execution. This has been tested on Microsoft, and many many Unices. Macintosh may also be vuln. Ironically enough, IE is unaffected." Update: 06/08 23:56 GMT by H : The problem seems to be one in the Java security model itself; but the evidence seems to be that if you turn off JavaScript, you turn off the vulnerability. Update: 06/09 00:56 GMT by T : According to this followup message from Mozilla security group member Daniel Veditz, the problem is actually one that's already been fixed in Mozilla 1.3, and not a remote command execution vulnerability at all. (Thanks to reader Jared Klett and others.)

4 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. Ex-Squeeze-Me?! by inertia187 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm going to stick my neck out here and say, What.In.The.Hell? Who's the editor on-duty here, an Onion stand in?

    First of all, the example made is JavaScript, not Java. Second, the example shows how to bring up a page 23000 seconds after they left the page. Not good, but not new either. So what's the big deal?

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  2. Obligatory rant by OmniVector · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Java is NOT THE SAME THING as JavaScript.

    Come on slashdot editors, it's not hard to know the difference (this is in reference to the article title).
    </rant>

    --
    - tristan
  3. This seems bogus. by pegacat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At first blush this seems plain wrong.

    There's not really enough evidence in the post to go on, but the example exploit is pure nuisence java script, which has nothing to do with java

    Reference is made in the text to ancient *java* bugs, but no detail is given as to how they might be related to the current, claimed bug.

    If there's more here than meets the eye I'd like to see it, but there doesn't seem to be any meat in this announcement, it seems to be just a historical retrospective and an annoying-but-not-dangerous-or-new snippet of javascript.

    Am I missing something here?

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird.
  4. Re:IE not vulnerable by Ogerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's pretty clear that IE's problems are slowly but surely being squashed. When you have a user base as large as IE's, it is inevitable that these problems will be found quickly and exploited and then fixed. We can take this as an indication that the larger the user base of a software product, the faster bugs will be found and eliminated.

    It's pretty clear, judging by this and some of your former posts, that you work for Microsoft or at least enjoy spreading their nonsense FUD. Your assumptive argument--that a smaller user base means that OSS has more undiscovered bugs--is entirely illogical. ..Not to mention it flies entirely in the face of the fact that IE has the most piss-poor standards support of any modern browser. (CSS in particular).

    Now take Mozilla and Opera as opposing examples. The user base for these two browsers combined is infinitesimal compared to IE. It thus stands to reason that all of the bugs and vulnerabilities of these browsers lay dormant, waiting for someone to come along and exploit them. But without a serious user base hammering away at the product all of these problems lie wide open for any hacker to come along and abuse.

    There you go again. You seem to miss the point entirely that having code open for review allows "hackers" to find security holes much faster and easier. So if a problem exists, it gets fixed much sooner than a closed source program which requires a lot more prodding and guesswork to discover the vulnerabilities. And yet IE still has historically had far more security issues than Mozilla.

    Just because you don't use Microsoft products doesn't mean that you aren't vulnerable. You are probably more vulnerable, when you take into account the lack of users and lack of accountability of the OSS project developers.

    Yet another patently untrue statement. Microsoft products have a far worse history of vulnerabilities than Open Source alternatives. Again your comment about "lack of users" is irrelevant. And your statement that OSS developers lack accountability is entirely baseless.

    The M$ dominated world is quickly coming to an end and there's absolutely nothing you can do about it. For your own sake, wake up before you become entirely obsolete.