AAC Put To The Test
technology is sexy writes "Following the increasing popularity of AAC in online music stores and the growing amount of implementations in software and hardware, the format is now being put to the test. How well does Apple's implementation fare against Ahead Nero, Sorenson or the Open Source FAAC at the popular bitrate of 128kbps? Find out for yourself and help by submitting the
results. You can find instructions on how to participate here. The best AAC codec gets to face MP3, MP3Pro, Vorbis, MusePack and WMA in the next test. Previous test results at 64kbps can be found here."
this makes the format rather irrelevant.
mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
I prefer DVDA.
What hyphen?
graspee
256khz mp3? That is amazing, I only ever use 44khz
What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
In the Billy and the Boingers' "U Stink But I Luv U" encoding test, the OOP-AAC compression scheme won by a wide margin.
Well, I'm not using AAC until it supports Ogg.
I mean, damn them! Nirvana didn't pay $606.17 to record Bleach so that some Corporate Asswipe could make a high fidelty copy of it!
The Ramones would be very peeved to find all the work they put into keeping most songs to three, dingy, distorted chords, ripped to a high fidelty format.
You know what?