Slashdot Mirror


Ogg Theora Alpha 2 Released

An anonymouse reader writes "After almost seven months, another alpha release of Ogg Theora is finally out. Still not production ready, but it's certainly showing some progress." The world needs a free video codec. Looking forward to seeing where this one goes.

21 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Re:wider use of free codecs by molarmass192 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the RIAA will bully their way into making them illegal

    They haven't done that with MP3 ... let me suffix that with a "yet".

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  2. Part of a live ISO PVR? by timothy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not that the video codec is the only important part of this, but the fact that unlike most, Ogg Theora is completely free of patent / royalty issues.

    Imagine (it's not a great stretch anymore, though it might have been a few years ago) being able to assemble a box with a hard drive, motherboard, memory, then popping in a CD ala Knoppix or Gentoo Live, and BOOM there's a DVR. Movix is one side of the instant multi-media computer, but does not offer capture / record functions.

    Built-to-purpose, such a computer ought to have a TV-out (and the live ISO would have to support it ;) -- including well-designed menus like the ones for freevo and mythTV, suitable for low-res TV screens -- so it could be used without a conventional monitor attached).

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  3. World needs it, but will they use it? by Strike · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The world needed a free audio codec but ogg vorbis is still a fairly niche market in the compressed audio field these days. I use it and love it but I am still in the vast minority. I would use (and love) a free video codec from the Xiph people as well, but that doesn't mean that other people will. It's that damn market momentum holding good things back, but such is the plight of a lot of good technologies it seems.

    1. Re:World needs it, but will they use it? by MrNemesis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It depends on the "they" part.

      True, in the corporate universe, I can't see any of the big businesses jumping ten feet in the air every time a new rev of an open source codec comes out. IMO the big comms and content providers are always going to stick with WMV, Real, QT, etc.

      On the personal level though, things are much different. Sounds trollish I know, but I think that an awful lot of codec takeup by end users is driven by P2P. This isn't so prevalent with ogg vorbis, but the amount of XviD's out there (some even in OGM format rather than AVI) is colossal. I use it for all of my DVD rips (and no, I don't share them, I just a) like to have them available on any box in the house and b) it's fun).

      So I think if it's good enough, we'll see an awful lot of Theora in the horrible grey area of online movies, but I really can't see the corps jumping ship for it for quite some time. It's a shame, but a great many corps seem to be caught in the inertia of proprietary standards, as the parent noted.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  4. Re:XviD? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What about XviD?

    Because XviD, as an MPEG-4 implementation, uses patented algorithms. It doesn't matter how free the code is if you need a license to be allowed to compile and run it.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. Re:Benefits? by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    mpeg is a patent minefield.

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  6. Re:XviD? by WWWWolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    XviD is MPEG-4, which is, as usual, a patent minefield. The code may be open, but use is still restricted by the patents.

    VP3 (on which Theora is based on) is likewise patented, but AFAIK they've gotten an unrevocable royalty-free license to the patents, or something equally non-threatening.

  7. Not a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The world needs a free video codec.

    Why? Can someone explain to me why "the world" needs this? Isn't it more accurate to say "some people want this, but the vast majority of the world literally couldn't care less?"

    1. Re:Not a troll by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If patent encumbered tech becomes standard, electronics become more expensive. If patent-issue-free tech becomes standard, electronics become cheaper.

      If patent-issue-free tech becomes standard, legally distributing media can become absolutely free.

      If patents are too expensive, some cool tech just never comes to light.

      Besides all this, which people like paying more for their electronics, movies and music?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  8. Re:OGG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The audio codec is called Ogg Vorbis, not OGG.

  9. Re:Tools vs. content by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You'd like to think that, wouldn't you? But what about that tool which allows you to watch dvd's on linux? If I recal correctly, they managed to outlaw that 'screwdriver'.

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  10. Re:OGG by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..but takes more processor to play (at least the last time I played with Ogg, and I admit my only testing was with the xmms plugin). Not great if you want to use on a portable device, where battery life is a concern.

  11. Re:Free, how? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Simple: MPEG-1 provides poor compressions ratios and VP3.2 has poor(er) quality. I think what people are really meaning when they say "we need a free video codec" is "we need a video codec that reaches the size and quality levels of MPEG-4, but isn't patent encumbered".

  12. OT: Moderation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've got mod points, but I'm all out of crack. Seems like some of the other moderators got too much of it, though, because I find absolutely nothing funny in the above post (except the spelling mistakes, and the fact that it's moderated 'funny' -- we need a metamod for funny moderations).

    So, /.-gods, can you please hand out the crack fairly and evenly among us hard working moderators. I need it (why the hell would I moderate if it wasn't for the crack?). (Posting anonymously to preserve karma so I can get more crack sooner.)

  13. Re:OGG by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not great if you want to use on a portable device, where battery life is a concern.

    Meh, this is becoming less and less of a concern. Your average PDA has a pretty damn powerful processor in it these days, while still having decent battery life. Heck, even cell-phones these days are pretty powerful. Enough so that decoding Vorbis shouldn't be a huge issue. And this ignores the possibility of hardware decoders, which make this whole point moot. Of course, a good question here is, how suitable is Vorbis for implementation in hardware?

  14. Re:Open Source Codec by motown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is one problem with xvid, however.

    Since it's based on mpeg4, it's software patent encumbered. Perhaps no problem at all in Europe (and I sure hope it will stay that way, have you signed the petition yet, folks?), but a major problem in the US as well as other countries where these patents apply.

    Don't take me wrong, I really appreciate and respect the amazing work the people of the xvid-project have produced so far, but to be honest: that's all the more reason for me to be disappointed in the fact that so many talented people are basically wasting their efforts on the xvid-project, in stead of putting their skills to use within the Theora-project. Theora is also covered by software patents, but all of these are owned by On2, and On2 has signed an agreement with Xiph.org, which has effectively renders all of these patents powerless. I commend the On2-people on that!

    But returning to xvid: Again, why don't more xvid-developers turn their attention to the (IMO more worthwhile) Theora project? I understand that if they would, they would have to be VERY careful to keep any mpeg4 patents (as well as any other patents not donated by On2) out of the Theora-project. But I'm sure they already put a lot of non-patented optimizations in xvid already, which they could also have implemented in Theora, without any legal issues. Or am I wrong?

    Would any xvid-developer care to comment on this?

    --
    "Oooh, does that mean we get to kick some puffy white mad zionist butt?"
  15. playing QuickTime on Linux by halfelven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just install Xine. Download and install the Windows DLLs. Done. Now you can play QuickTime files, and even QuickTime webcasts (not to mention Windows Media, because those DLLs contain the required codecs). Heck, if you install RealPlayer9 for *NIX, you can also play Real Media in Xine.
    If you install the gxine interface, not xine-ui (but you can install as many interfaces at the same time as you like) you even get a Mozilla plugin to play all those formats in your browser. ;-)
    For the lazy, Red Hat RPM packages are here: freshrpms.net.
    No emulation (Wine or otherwise) required.

  16. What about Ogg Tarkin? by ae · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone have any further information on what's happening to Ogg Tarkin? The Ogg Theora FAQ says the following:

    Q: What about Tarkin?
    A: Tarkin is essentially a proof-of-concept wavelet-based codec. Its experimental nature means it will not be ready for general use for some time. VP3 is a high-quality codec that can meet today's video needs now, so Xiph.org will be focusing its efforts on Theora for the near future.
    --
    Blog Ho
  17. Re:Tools vs. content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Because this is a discussion about video codecs, not a discussion of grammar.

  18. Likely space savings by benwaggoner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, Theora isn't done yet, nor is its bitstream locked down, so it's impossible to say how small files will get.

    By the time it is GM, I imagine MPEG-4 will be well along in its migration to the new AVC codec, which offers much better compression efficiency than the current Simple and Advanced Simple profiles used by Divx, Xvid, etcetera. So even though the final Theora might be somewhat better than MPEG-4 today, it almost certainly will be behind MPEG-4 by the time it is released.

    Bear in mind that MP3 is ten years old now. Modern audio codecs like HE AAC are definitely better than Vorbis, technically.

    If Theora gets market share, it'll be because of its openness, not because of any price or quality advantages. Windows Media 9 is free-as-in-beer for most uses, and is today a lot better than Theora could possibly be in a year.

  19. Theora v. MPEG-2 by benwaggoner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, it really depends on what you want to do. The reason why MPEG-2 is "good enough" for DVD is that it is compatible with the DVD Video spec, which means it'll play back on set top boxes. It's not like we didn't have better codecs than MPEG-2 five years ago, but they aren't enough better that it'd make it worth ditching the installed base of DVD players!

    Still, we'll certainly be moving away from MPEG-2 when we move to HD DVD, since backwards compatibility will be punted anyway.

    There are lots of features that MPEG-2 has that are useful for video archiving and distribution, like support for interlaced video, support for non-square pixel files, and low per pixel-second CPU requirements. I don't see that Theora has any of these advantages.

    Conversely, it costs $2.50 to license MPEG-2 decoder support for a product, and Theora will be free. And Theora will be able to provide better quality at low data rates.

    It all depends on what you need to do.

    Personally, I doubt Theora will get a lot of uptake by corporations. Its openness advantages are unlikely to overcome its disadvantages in maturity. Heck, Ogg Vorbis is quite mature, but no major media companies are using it as a distribution format. Apple picked AAC-LC instead, even though they have to pay a fee, as part of their general support of MPEG-4.