Slashdot Mirror


Texas Scientists Spin Carbon Nanotube Fiber

RedCard writes "According to this article at news24.com, University of Texas scientists have managed to spin a fiber made of 60% carbon nanotubes that is five times stronger than steel and is "tougher than any natural or synthetic fibre described so far" - including spider silk! Previous attempts at making fibers like this have only produced relatively short lengths, but these guys have produced lengths of 100 metres at the rate of 70cm per minute!"

3 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. nanotube strength by Artemis+P.+Fonswick · · Score: 5, Informative

    One can estimate theoretically the ultimate strength of a nanotube be examining the microscopic failure modes, i.e. the ways in which atoms rearrange in response to an external stress (i.e. stretching). In the case of perfect, defect-free nanotubes, there are two modes that seem to be important. First, the rotation of a single carbon-carbon bond by 90 degrees, which converts a patch of 4 hexagons (remember that carbon atoms are arranged in a chicken-wire or honeycomb pattern on the tube wall) into two pentagons and two heptagons (relevant references are Zhang & Crespi from Penn State in Physical Review Letters and work by Bernholc at NC State and Yacobson at Rice I think, but the exact journal escapes me at the moment). This mode is a plastic distortion of the tube; the tube with the bonds rearranged is a bit longer than it was before. The second failure mode is for one of the hexagonal rings of carbon atoms to break open, i.e. for a carbon-carbon bond to break. This is a more catastrophic event, in that the tube then quickly breaks near the point of failure. Which way a tube fails may actually depend on how the honeycomb pattern is rolled into a tube shape. Now that's just the microscopic theory on the ideal, defect-free system. In a real tube, one expects there to be pre-existing defects in the structure. The failure under tension will then be at the defective points But, since nanotubes are so small, it's plausible that a single tube or bunch of tubes might grow entirely defect-free, in which case one can access the ultimate theoretical failure strength. Experiments on trying to stretch and break single bundles of nanotubes (Lieber's group at Harvard) show that one can extend a nanotube by about 6% of it's length before it breaks. This is in good agreement with the theoretical predictions mentioned above (and it's a legit prediction- the theory came first!). So it appears that in small enough systems, one can attain the theoretical mechanical strength.

    --


    Kudos to you, my good man.
  2. Have they fixed the flashlight insta-burn problem? by sudog · · Score: 5, Funny

    I seem to recall that a bright source of light can make carbon nanotubes burn up like ignited magnesium.

    Yea, I'd be the first to wear or use this fabric.. "Smile for the camera!"

    "No, wait!" *clic-FLASH* "AAAARGH THE HUMANITY!"

  3. Re:Not quite there yet (Re:Incredible!) by CTachyon · · Score: 5, Informative

    The elevator becomes feasible at around 130GPa, so there is a little ways to go yet. It is only a matter of time now.

    Actually, myself and another poster re-derived the minimum tensile strength for a space elevator the last time the subject came up. The figure for a minimal self-supporting space elevator that barely supports its own weight is about 63 GPa, and everything past that is gravy, so we're even closer than your numbers suggest.

    --
    Range Voting: preference intensity matters