Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Backs Down on Windows 2000 EULA

nachoboy writes "After the fiasco surrounding the overly intrusive EULA for Windows 2000 SP3, it seems Microsoft has backed down a bit with the upcoming release of SP4. The section concerning automatic updates now states simply "You consent to the operation of these features, unless you choose to switch them off or not use them." The EULA then proceeds to list the five services liable to connect to the internet without explicit confirmation. A reference copy of the SP4 EULA may be found here. We can only hope for a similar move with Windows XP."

6 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apparently Windows Upbreak decided to update a bunch of stuff that required the new video driver before it updated the video driver itself.

    Apparently you never looked at Windows Update enough to realize that you can control the order of the installation. Want to do driver updates first? No problem. Oh wait, it is easier to complain and blame Microsoft.

  2. This may help in the future by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Informative
    Removing evil from 2000/XP.

    I can't wait til this is done, as I use 98lite for the pentium 233 here at work.

    Speedy goodness, and I feel a bit better about the saftey of my midget porn.

    Does this have anything to do with SP4? I don't know. I just wonder what SP4 will break.

    1. Re:This may help in the future by Jack+Comics · · Score: 4, Informative

      XP Lite is complete and total vaporware. It's been promised for *years* now, and absolutely nothing new has been said or seen about it since it was originally announced in 2001.

      The project probably turned out to be bigger than the software coders could chew, as removing the crud from 9x is a far easier task than removing it from 2000 & XP.

      In other words, expect XP Lite to be released the same day as Duke Nukem Forever.

      --
      "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
  3. Re:Not as good as it seems by sheldon · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Not according to M*ft's legal brochureware. They claim that using an XP license to install w2kpro is a violation. We had to look that up at work a while ago. "

    It depends on how you obtained the product. Volume Licensing users automatically have this right.. (search for downgrade)

    Retail purchasers are supposed to ask for permission.

  4. Re:Not as good as it seems by Yankovic · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is incorrect. More recent licenses (such as the one on SP4) supercede previous agreements. This section from the EULA clearly identifies this:

    19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This EULA (including any addendum or amendment to this EULA which is included with the Product) and the CAL or TS CAL (if applicable) are the entire agreement between you and Microsoft relating to the Product and the support services (if any) and they supersede all prior or contemporaneous oral or written communications, proposals and representations with respect to the Product or any other subject matter covered by this EULA.

  5. Re:the catch is.... by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Prevent media player from sending anything to M$ to get around that snooping/IP police force nonsense they add.

    Better yet, use Windows Media Player 6.4. Even after you "upgrade" to later versions, it's still there...even on this WinXP SP1 box I'm using right now. It plays all of the same stuff that the later versions play (at least I haven't found anything that wouldn't play), the interface is much less obnoxious, and it doesn't "phone home" every time you start it up. You should be able to find it as c:\Program Files\Windows Media Player\mplayer2.exe. Use right-click and "Open With..." to associate media files with it instead of wmplayer.exe.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.