Slashdot Mirror
Oyez.Org Releases Supreme Court MP3 Archives
jeblucas writes "The US Supreme Court's multimedia site, Oyez.org, has released numerous archives from seminal cases from the 50's, 60's and 70's. They are available in MP3 format for the first time. Previously you could order cassettes and listen to .smil RealAudio, but who wants to do that? Want to learn more about: The Right to Remain Silent? Roe v Wade? Affirmative Action?"
...according to Google and dictionary.reference.com, means hear ye.
numerous archives from seminal cases from the 50's, 60's and 70's. They are available in MP3 format
Wow! That boggles my mind! I want to know who had the foresight to record the cases in MP3 format way back in the 1950s. And even more importantly, I'd like to know if they have any investment tips to share...
-- MarkusQ
One of the lease publicized cases in the history of the Supreme Court cases is Loving v. Virginia.
If you are truly interested in history and how far we have come I recommend that you listen to: Loving v. Virginia
-----
One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
I'm downloading Gideon v. Wainwright, the case that established a defendant's right to an attorney if he could not afford one. See the book and movie, Gideon's Trumpet.
"Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
The US Supreme Court's multimedia site, Oyez.org
While they provide Supreme Court multimedia, they are not an official Supreme Court site.
I'm the technical lead on Oyez. I didn't imagine that this would make Slashdot quite so fast... Egads... Though it explains the dead server this morning. :-) It's fine now, though if the heavy traffic volume message comes up again, mail me using the link on that page.
:-])
:-)
This release is a bit premature. We are working with Creative Commons to license this audio so that others can download and share and create non-commercial derivative works of the audio. If you would like to do me a huge favor, please download the cases you like and place them on your favorite peer-to-peer network. We're looking to make these audio files as widely available as possible, while showing that there are substantial non-piracy uses for P2P networks. (It'll be harder for the RIAA to argue next time to shut down these networks when they are used to distribute Supreme Court audio to citizens.
In any case, look for a press release soon. I just posted that URL so that Oyez users would download the audio and start sharing. I didn't imagine that it would get this publicity so quick.
Anyways, I'll be monitoring this thread, so if you have any questions, comments, or suggestions, please let us know. We're a very user-centric site.
-Chris Karr, Oyez Technical Lead
I'm very glad to see that some kind of recording is made and may be released someday.
'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
This is really cool. Some years back, someone made a big splash (and pissed off a bunch of people, if I recall correctly) when he took a bunch of Supreme Court tapes, edited them down, added some basic commentary, and published 6 cassettes along with a book (called May It Please The Court). It covered 20-some cases, from Roe v Wade to flag burning to creationism. (I see there's a second book, focusing on First Amendment cases, as well.)
I highly recommend this, as the commentary and text really help the reader/listener to understand what's going on. It's truly fascinating, even just from the standpoint of how these procedings operate (it's almost closer to a debate than a courtroom), and gives incredible insight into why the Court rules one way or another, at a more "human" level (it's not all dry legalese).
I haven't checked out oyez.org yet (hopefully it's recovering), so I don't know how much it has as far as commentary or background, but hopefully it'll be as interesting as this book was.
The naming convention is partly due to the fact that we are using Cocoon as a content system and it's easier to use the names as they are for any number of reasons that would bore anyone here.
However, when you click the link, the code responsible for sending the MP3 will attempt to set a Content-disposition field so that while the name is argument.mp3, the "Save As" dialog boxes will suggest something more descriptive.
Let me know if this doesn't work for you. I know some browsers don't support it, but I thought we had tested on the major ones.
-Chris
I tihnk it would be funny to have a court case of the RIAA on MP3 format.
-------
Support Indy Music. Buy
Ogg is on our list of things to do. The reason MP3 was chosen was because its much wider public acceptance and digital audio devices overwhelmingly play MP3.
We used iTunes as the initial encoder, and later downsampled the files using LAME. Since iTunes is licensed, the encoding side is covered. As far as the players, 99% of our audience will be using licensed encoders anyways. This gets back to the issue of MP3 acceptance v. Ogg acceptance.
-Chris
In the future, some more context would be good.
The Loving v. Virginia decision overturned a number of a laws prohibiting interracial marriage. Here is a summary of Loving v. Virginia with the Supreme Court's opinion.
Search 2010 Gen Con events
This means many dial-up users can't get a complete file. It would be a very useful feature to add.
I agree with motown that Ogg Vorbis and Speex are worth a look. Ogg Vorbis is good at 48k mono, but is surprisingly bad at 32k.