Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Files 15 Lawsuits Against Spammers

Popsikle writes "A Seattle Paper reports that 'Microsoft Corp. announced it has filed 15 lawsuits against alleged e-mail spammers in Washington state and the United Kingdom on Tuesday.' It states the tough anti-spam laws in UK and Washington allows ISP's to sue spammers. This could be a good test of the new anti-spam laws." There's coverage on CNN as well. Microsoft has picked a good venue for such a case.

3 of 392 comments (clear)

  1. Full list of charges including details by Wizard+of+OS · · Score: 5, Informative

    A full list can be found on microsoft's site:

    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2003/Ju n0 3/0617SpamEnforcementFS.asp

    </karmawhore>

    --

    --
    If code was hard to write, it should be hard to read
  2. Re:What about MS by mosschops · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just this morning I got 5 emails from hotmail accounts asking if I wanted:

    Spammers fake the sender's address all the time. If you dug into the mail header details I'm willing to bet they didn't come from Hotmail servers.

    Try typing this in exactly as shown:

    telnet your.smtp.server 25
    HELO somedomain.com
    MAIL FROM:
    RCPT TO:
    DATA
    Subject: junk subject line

    junk body text
    .

    The blank line after the subject and the dot on the line by itself are important.

    Congratulations - you've just sent yourself a forged e-mail. Easy wasn't it? :-)

  3. Re:Gorilla Against Spam!! (GAS) by Nato_Uno · · Score: 5, Informative

    Under the Washington law (Revised Code of Washington 19.190) both the end-user recipient and the "interactive computer service" that that recipient uses may sue the spammer. The "interactive computer service" is not suing on the user's behalf, but on their own behalf.

    And I think this is great, personally. If all major ISPs did this, SPAM load would go down significantly. Of course it wouldn't disappear completely, and the really tricky spammers would be trickier, but the overall load would certainly go down and the remaining SPAM would very likely be easier to block...

    --

    Have fun,

    Nathan 'Nato' Uno
    http://web.unos.net/