Slashdot Mirror


RIAA CEO Hilary Rosen to Become CNBC Commentator

alen writes "According to a story by the New York Post the CEO of the RIAA is stepping down. She is going to be an anchor on CNBC. Maybe this is going to signal a change in the way record companies think about file sharing?"

3 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. Oh great.... by KoshClassic · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    What's next? Perhaps CNBC will hire David Duke to do commentary.

    --
    Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
  2. Yea, she volunteered to be RIAA president by dh003i · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    because she disagreed with the RIAA's nazi-positions on music, right?

    Fact is, if Rosen didn't agree with those positions, she wouldn't have been doing that job.

  3. You are the most ignorant person ever by Uart · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    - Copyrights can be transferred, therefore, I cannot assume that your artist owns her own copyright. Check it out, thats what this whole SCO suit is about. Think before you type.

    - I have studied IP law. I know it like the back of my hand.

    - you said "There's a real world out there. In that world, scanbots search sites looking for .mp3s with names resembling that of songs belonging to RIAA member labels, and bots send DMCA takedown notices to ISP ...It is not required that a DMCA takedown notice be fair or reasonable." Which is true, but you CAN represent yourself, someone who is (self proclaimed) as knowledgable about IP laws as yourself should be able to handle it. Besides, it would be a silly move to name all of your songs with the names of copyrighted songs, change the names on the MP3s and they won't get busted. The RIAA also doesn't stand a chance in hell of beating you in court if the MP3s aren't in violation of a copyright.

    -You win on fair use I guess, my definition did not take into account for the cited legislation. (I'll conceed to you on that one)

    -"Why don't you run along and play with matches?" No problem, just tell me where your house is...

    -I attened a private high school and college. Tax-payer funds weren't "wasted" on me.

    -I am not a member of the GOP, and, in fact voted (mostly) for independant candidates in the last election. You are still a communist. I am not a born-again, I am an athiest. You are an ignorant biggot.

    -You are still ignorant. I am only fortified in this belief by your insistence on ad hominem attacks (which I must admit that I too am guilty of, in retaliation). You are a typical pinko liberal shmo who probably would suck Bill Clinton's dick if he promised to end capitalism as we know it.

    In theory I like the DMCA. Thats right, mods, do your worst. In many ways the DMCA has provisions that protect parties from being wrongfully charged with infringement. That said, it does have its abuses - these are holes that should be plugged.

    To oppose fair enforcement of copyright laws is anti-capitalist, and against the essential principals that define this country. Unless you believe that Communism works (worked real well in the USSR) or hell, even socialism (worked out perfectly in the UK), you should stop trying to convert this country to one of those systems.

    "I'm also published writer on computers and the Net. This means that people pay for what I write on occasion. "

    God help those people.

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!