Slashdot Mirror


Collecting a Judgement?

rk2z asks: "I did some independent contractor work about 6 months ago. I delivered the software as specified in my contract and turned in the hours that it took. I then sent the company an invoice for $1400 which was based upon my contracted hourly work rate. They had paid me in the past so I didnâ(TM)t do anything like withhold source code until payment. To make a long story short, they refused to pay me and I ended up taking them to Small Claims court in the state of Nebraska. I won a judgment for the above amount. The problem is, Iâ(TM)m not really sure how to go about collecting my judgment. The amount is relatively small so I donâ(TM)t want to consult a lawyer, because it not really worth blowing the entire judgment before I even get it. But it's big enough that I donâ(TM)t want to give up on it."

"I looked a couple of law websites like here and here, but their suggestion were fairly broad.

Does anyone have any experience in going after debtors (without a lawyer if possible)? Is it better to go to a collection agency and blow half the settlement up front? If so does any one know a good collection agency?

Things to keep in mind: [the customer] is a small company (less than 7 employees). They have some property like computers and such, but how do I find out what they own vs. what is leased. Owned property can be seized by the Sheriff and sold at auction. I have tried to contact them about a monthly/weekly payment plan, but have been blown off every time I try to make some progress on the issue. Thanks in advance."

25 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Take them back to court by MrResistor · · Score: 5, Informative

    If they haven't paid you then they haven't fulfilled their side of the contract, and they don't own (or otherwise have rights to) the code you wrote. If they're selling/distributing the code that could be a big problem for them as that would be a violation of your copyright, and damages for that are up to $150k per violation. Wouldn't they feel stupid for not paying you that $1400?

    I think I would just talk to the Sheriff, though. I very much doubt that you have to know ahead of time what equipment they own or lease. That's the sort of thing that can be sorted out after it's seized.

    You might also want to contact a credit reporting agency to see how you can put a black mark on their credit report.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Take them back to court by spumoni_fettuccini · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also you may want to try the better business bureau and see what resolution they might be able to provide. Check in your area for mediators, as they may be able to help settle the payment of what you are owed [any legit company would really like to settle/pony up rather than face bad PR]. If you know a Guido or Vinny that may help as well. ;)

      --
      -- Some days you're the dog; some days you're the hydrant.
    2. Re:Take them back to court by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's to stop the court from saying "This is a contract dispute, not a copyright dispute, because the contract didn't specify that all rights stay with the author until final payment. The contract issues have already been litigated and resolved, so I'll dismiss this, clear my calendar and look efficient"?

      Because by default the copyright belongs to the person who actually wrote the code. The only way that can be changed is through a contract, and if the customer hasn't fulfilled their part of the bargain, the contract doesn't mean jack. Quid Pro Quo is the basis of all contract law, and it means they can't ask you to give something up without giving you something in return.

      The contract issues have been litigated, but they haven't been resolved, and that's exactly the reason it would be going back to court.

      Really, having the Sherrif go in and seize some of their stuff for sale at auction is the best way to go, since that's already specifically allowed for in the ruling. If he wants to really shaft them he can try to have the contract declared null and void due to their non-payment and go after them for copyright violation, but that's more hassle than I think I would want to deal with, and definately requires a lawyer. Another option is to go with a collection agency, but I think I would go back to court first in order to have the cost of using a collection agency added to the damages, although I expect that would have a good chance of being dismissed.

      Then again, I would have asked for more than $1400 in the first place, at the very least adding the court costs (small claims is cheap, not free) and billing for the time spent persuing payment at the contractual rate, including an estimate of the time spent in the court room. After all, they've made that a cost of developing for them, and they should pay for that. I'm betting that would have just about doubled the damages, which would have basically payed for the collection agency.

      Then again, I have the benefit of seeing my dad deal with these kind of things, so I've learned to anticipate these kinds of issues.

      Other options for going back to court are to attach their income (probably called something else in this case, basically having the money taken directly out of their account and they don't have a say in it) or freeze their bank accounts or put a lein on the business. There are all kinds of fun things you can do.

      Non-court options are the Better Business Bureau, which someone else mentioned. I like this one personally, my wife complained to the BBB about the dealer we bought our first car from, who kept jerking us around and trying to change the contract, and the next day the manager was calling up ready to clean the soles of her shoes with his tongue in order to resolve the problem. But then I live in a state where the BBB is actually effective, so YMMV.

      I also like the idea of putting a black mark on their credit report, and I'd probably do that regardless of whatever else happened. That can be death for a company that small, as often the only way they can grow or even survive through slow periods is by having the ability to borrow money.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:Take them back to court by misterpies · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if the contract was not fulfilled then it is void

      This is a misconception of contract law.

      What does it mean if a contract is "void"? It means that each party is put back in the same position as if the contract had never existed. So in the current case, the company would give back the code and the developer would give back the money he got.

      However, in this case the problem was that the developer never got any money. The reason he was able to sue on the contract and win shows that the contract is valid. The court ruling was to enforce the contract according to its original terms, not to annul it. Having enforced the contract, all terms in the contract will still be valid, including any relating to IP.

      If the company is refusing to pay up even after the judgment, then it's in contempt of court. That's a criminal offence, so what our screwed-over friend needs to do is threaten to report the company to the local DA. In terms of collecting the judgment, he can try a debt collection agency but they'll take a cut of the winnings.

      What our friend should have done is consulted a lawyer before going to court. If his case was as open-and-shut as it sounds, then there's no doubt that the court would have awarded him legal costs against the company. So he wouldn't have paid a penny for his lawyer, and the lawyer would know exactly what to do to get hold of the money (and would do it quick since he wants to get hold of his money).

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  2. Try this by cybermage · · Score: 4, Informative

    My mother went through this to collect back rent from a tennant:

    After securing a judgement, ensure that they're are notified of the judgement and given a small window of time to pay. After that, engage the services of the county sheriff where they are located. Sheriff's have the authority to seize property to settle small claims judgements.

  3. Collection Service.. by metacosm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Contact a collection service. They take a % of the total (often seems like a large %) -- but remember... getting 80% of 1400 is better than getting 0%, and without professional help that is what you will probably get.

    The collection agency has tools to make life hard for those holding out on you (even before you go to court, with the solidity of a court decision, you should be in an even stronger position).

    Call today -- and forget about it -- just wait for the check. They specialize in this -- and want their % -- they will get the job done, they deal with hundreds of companies like this everyday.

    1. Re:Collection Service.. by Scaba · · Score: 3, Funny

      If by "collection agency" you mean a guy like Nicky Santoro (Joe Pesci) from Casino , then yes, this is good advice.

  4. Contempt of court is no joke by evil_roy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you have the judgement, does it specify anything more than an amount? A time frame for example. Here (Australia) these small claims judgements have a time frame - typically 28 days for the payment schedule to be agreed by both parties, failing which the matter goes back to court for a binding ruling. If the debtor fails to pay then they are in contempt of court - a much bigger deal as far as penalties are concerned. Talk to staff at the court - most courts do not like their decisions to be met with contempt.

  5. They May Be Liable for Legal Fees by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know you don't want a lawyer, but face it: lawyers are paid for things like this because they know more ins and outs than you'll ever know.

    For example: You want to attach or seize property. Didn't it occur to you to seize their bank account? (I learned this from a lawyer friend.) They've paid you before. Do you remember their bank? You could actually have the funds in their bank account seized. Then you wouldn't have to worry about equipment and selling it to recoup fees.

    Another point: In many situations like this, if you hire a lawyer to attach, seize, or garnish their account, THEY can be held responsible for legal fees. Think of it: They don't pay, you sue, they ignore it, you hire a lawyer, the lawyer seizes not only your fee (plus, in VA, you can get upto 9% interest per year), but the lawyer's fee is also seized and deducted from their account.

    If this works in your state, then you walk away with your fee and free legal service. They pay your fee and the legal fees for the lawyer that you hired!

  6. The Slashdot way... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Threaten to mention their website on Slashdot. I'm sure a lot of us would be happy to click the link a few times.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  7. Do this by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read this part very carefully: This is NOT legal advice. I am NOT a lawyer, much less a lawyer licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.

    Furthermore, I have no idea what Nebraska law is like. So there will be things that are different than how I've described them here. Possibly there are additional steps you need to take, or additional things you need to do.

    So don't rely on this.

    Here we go:

    You have a judgment. You need to execute that judgment. Because right now the judgment alone is just a pretty piece of paper. All you are right now is an unsecured creditor. Little more than scum, in the greater scheme of things, no offense. You need to act to raise your status!

    Go to the courthouse, find the clerk of courts, and get a writ of execution (aka a writ fi. fa., or writ of attachment).

    The writ is an order by the court to the Sheriff ordering him to go find property owned by the debtor that is not exempt from execution (such as the clothes on their backs, were the debtors individuals), take it, sell it at auction, keep enough money to handle their own costs, give you however much is left until you have all you were owed, and then the surplus goes back to the debtor.

    Basically, once you've gotten the writ and the sheriff has recieved it, he'll go out there one day in a pickup truck and start taking stuff. Find out when he's going, and go along, so that you can pick out good stuff that is sure to sell at auction for enough money. But make sure that you don't pick out things that are exempt by law; you may need to do some research on Nebraska law to figure this out.

    BE AWARE that sheriff's auctions hardly ever get the full value of whatever's being sold. You may want to find something that you PERSONALLY want, have it seized, then buy it at auction, likely for whatever price you were owed. Then use it, or sell it yourself, or whatever.

    Note that some property is difficult to load in a pickup truck -- land, for example. Don't worry if the sheriff merely declares that he has executed on it, and maybe tapes on a piece of paper to that effect. It's legal, and the debtor will get in serious trouble if he fucks with that property (selling it or damaging it), including, e.g. contempt of court.

    HOWEVER, if the sheriff can't find anything, he will report back to the court (on a document called a return that lists whatever he finds) 'nulla bona.' (at least if he has any respect for tradition)

    Anyhow, once the sheriff got something, you are now a judicial lien creditor BUT IN THAT PROPERTY ONLY. Otherwise your status is unchanged.

    PLUS there are even more fun things you can do.

    Instead of bothering with the writ fi. fa., you may be able to take advantage of your state's turnover statute. This dispenses with the sheriff and is a court order directing the debtor to just give you property in his control, even if not in his posession. And since you can use discovery rules in this process, you can make him tell you, under oath, with penalties for perjury applicable, as to what it is he's got.

    If there is real estate in the county, you might be able to have your lien recorded in the county courthouse. This might also be called abstraction. It places a lien on the real property in the county (NOT personal property; that is, land, not pick-up-able stuff). This prevents him from selling it, since anyone who bought it later, until you're paid off, would basically wind up having to pay.

    Or if negotiations haven't entirely broken down, you could offer to trade your judgment for a security interest in some specific property (you will be much more likely to want a lawyer for this, as all the p's and q's HAVE to be minded) which basically means you'd have a much stronger claim.

    Since, if the debtor goes into bankruptcy, you're in serious trouble. You DON'T want that to happen. It will totally fuck you up.

    Additionally, ACT FAST. There is a sort of pecking order. Firstly, sold property pays court/sheriff's expenses.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    1. Re:Do this by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Read this part very carefully: This is NOT legal advice. I am NOT a lawyer, much less a lawyer licensed to practice in your jurisdiction."

      Are you a law student or some sort of legal worker then? They're the only ones I've ever seen who really really want to make sure that they are not giving out legal advice.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:Do this by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn straight, brother Surreal! Testify!

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    3. Re:Do this by nathanh · · Score: 3, Funny
      Read this part very carefully: This is NOT legal advice. I am NOT a lawyer, much less a lawyer licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.

      Look, I simply don't get this, and it's pissing me off. Cpt Kangarooski, I'm not pissed off at you, but I'm going to use you as a launching board for my rant. So please don't take any of this personally, especially seeing as your comment was genuinely helpful.

      When there's an article about ANYTHING then everybody is a self-proclaimed expert. Physics? Experts. Astronomy? Experts. Computers? Experts coming out the fucking woodwork. Everybody has an opinion about EVERYTHING on Slashdot and everybody is a freaking expert.

      Yet I don't see disclaimers stating "lack of professional experience" about anything except legal questions. I never see "I'm not a Java developer, so don't rely on this, and for god's sake seek professional help from Bill Joy before acting on these words, but... ". No, what you normally get is a self-proclaimed expert acting as if they were standing alongside Bill Joy and helping him nut out the hard bits. Similarly, if there is a question about evolution or religion (or even worse... evolution *and* religion) then suddenly everybody is both a Nobel Prize winner for biology and the Pope's right hand man. Nobody ever sticks a disclaimer at the start saying "my only experience with biology was in 9th grade HS and I don't even know what an ordainment means".

      So why the double standard for legal advice? Why is that 90% of the comments to this Ask-/. started with "IANAL" or something similar? Nobody is stupid enough to think that you are a lawyer, and even if they are that stupid that's their own damn problem. You're not going to be held liable for bad legal advice given under a PSEUDONYM on a PUBLIC BULLETIN BOARD when NO MONEY HAS EXCHANGED HANDS. Please, no more redundant "IANAL" disclaimers, unless you're going to start saying "IANA CEO OF MICROSOFT" and "IANA PERSON WHO HAS ANY CLUE ABOUT BIOLOGY" as well.

    4. Re:Do this by Naomiah · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is actually a reason everyone qualifies their legal expertise. That is because it is actually illegal to give legal advice unless you are a member of the bar, and people get prosecuted for it all the time.

      Even after I graduated law school, it was still illegal for me to give legal advice, until I received my bar results, and was sworn in.

      Nowadays, I know that part of the reason for the bar is to control the legal market, like a license. But it has always been true that you had to pass a qualifying exam of some sort, even just an oral one. Also, there have been lawyers for a long time, so there is a bit of a secret handshake aspect to it, I am sure.:)

      --
      "Yes, I am a lawyer." - Star Jones
    5. Re:Do this by nathanh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There is actually a reason everyone qualifies their legal expertise. That is because it is actually illegal to give legal advice unless you are a member of the bar, and people get prosecuted for it all the time.

      If it's illegal then non-lawyers should not be giving legal advice even with the disclaimer "IANAL". However, consider this case:

      One prominent area of the site advertises "Free Legal Advice." That portion of the site states in the preamble: "We are all led to believe that whenever we are faced with some legal matter that we automatically are required to employ an attorney. There are many matters of a legal nature that we can and should resolve on our own without incurring unnecessary expenses of an attorney. Although I am not an attorney, I can assure you that it is not necessary to be a lawyer in order to provide some guidance and/or advice on how to deal with your legal problems."

      He was giving legal advice while admitting to not being a lawyer. He was accused of practising the law without a license. The judgement from the Board ruled in his favour.

      Thus, according to the Board, "the publication of legal advice on Palmer's web-site, good or bad, is not of itself the unauthorized practice of the law."

      So at the very least in this specific case in this particular jurisdiction it was fine to offer legal advice without a license. The Board would have ruled differently if he had crossed the line and started to practise the law.

      Still, it was "troubling" to the Board that Palmer offered to respond to "any questions about your rights" and to "provide you with guidance and/or advice." The Board concluded that "if Palmer actually gave legal advice in specific response to a question from one of his readers, he would have engaged in the unauthorized practice of the law."

      But fortunately nobody on Slashdot ever gives specific responses because the questions lack any specific details.

      Either way, the IANAL is redundant. Either it is legal to give advice in which case you don't need the IANAL. Or it is illegal to give advice no matter how many disclaimers you insert.

    6. Re:Do this by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      The most effective way to avoid having your wages garnished is to try to be employed in the tech sector.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    7. Re:Do this by GreyyGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because you can be sued for giving faulty legal advice. I'm sure that there are logs somewhere that could be traced back to you. I'm sure you feel nice and cozy in your annonomous would, but then I'm sure those poor shmucks that use Verizon and were caught trading files felt that way too.

  8. writ of garnishment by angeles13 · · Score: 4, Informative

    IANAL

    I have gone through small claims court in Arizona. I have won twice. The difficulty is in the collecting. In the first case, no problem. The second case I am still trying to collect on. Fortunately I have the bank account information and in Arizona, I am able to garnish the bank account (except for a certain ammount) for what is owed. It took hiring a private investigator to find out what happened with the case (county recorder's office lost the paperwork -- keep your own copies of everything!!!) Now, I'm back to using the Court Constable for the serving the garnishment.

    Try contacting the Nebraska State Bar for information on small claims court for non lawyers. There should also be somewhere an agency for pro bono work for lawyers. In Arizona, it's Community Legal Services - they have a document that explains in plain English what it takes to go through small claims court and how to obtain your judgement (if awarded).

    Good Luck!

    --
    design is art - art is design
  9. Sell the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm making the assumption you aren't planning to ever deal with these people again? (heck, it sounds like too many bridges have been burnt for that already)

    In that case, the simplest and easiest way to get your money is to sell the debt to a debt collection agency.

    The agency buys the debt from you, and from then on it is their problem. And these agencies are experts at getting their money back.

    It's harsh, and it's cruel, and I think personally I would struggle with the morality of it, but if you really want the money, and there's no other way to get it, I know that this system works.

    1. Re:Sell the debt. by sribe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IANAL! And you probably need one. But I will say first that I found the post from cpt kangarooski to be quite good. A few comments:

      But make sure that you don't pick out things that are exempt by law; you may need to do some research on Nebraska law to figure this out.

      In Colorado you can basically take it all, and they have 10 days to file with the court to recover exempt equipment. Also in CO "essential" equipment can be exempt. IOW, they have 10 computers, the sheriff takes them all, the court will give them back the 1 with their QuickBooks file. Also make sure you know how much the stuff goes for on eBay, both so that you know how much to take and so you can show up at the sheriff's auction and bid up to that amount, if needed in order to prevent a bargain hunter from buying it all for $10. Be prepared for them to throw a fit, stand your ground, and don't wind up taking only enough stuff to cover 1/4 of the debt (ahem, speaking from experience here). Don't count on this of course, but the sheriff's department told my attorney that it's not uncommon for a company to send someone to the bank, accompanied by the deputy, to get a cashier's check rather than have their property seized.

      It's harsh, and it's cruel, and I think personally I would struggle with the morality of it

      WTF??? Companies know how much money they have in the bank, how much coming in, and what their expenses are. They knew they didn't have the money to pay this guy and let him keep working because they wanted, in effect, to steal his work. Yes, they were probably hoping that enough new sales would close that they'd be able to pay their bills, but they had to know there was a chance they'd wind up screwing him. Now on what plane of reality is there any possibility of a moral issue with collecting the debt?

      I don't know if you have such a mechanism in your state, but if you do a (real) threat to terminate the company is a much bigger stick than garnishing the account - it may be empty, they may just change banks etc.

      Yeah, I'm involved in a long-running attempt to collect from a company that has gone to great lengths to avoid paying their debts (transfer of assets to a sister company in another country, leaving the original US company defunct with all the debts, and forming a new US company with the same executives and employees to continue the development work on behalf of the foreign company). There's no direct way to shut them down, but soon enough they'll find themselves on the receiving end of an action that will force them to pay or guarantee that they'll never be able to sell their product in the US nor get another dollar from investors. The most ridiculous thing is that I've told them exactly what I'm doing, and they're just ignoring me. I guess they think I'm bluffing...

  10. Winding Up Order? by belroth · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Caveat: IANAL (I don't even play one on TV)

    Here in the UK a friend was owed money by an agency for some contract programming he had done for them and they wouldn't pay his final invoice. Not couldn't, just wouldn't. As he routinely refers to agents as 'parasites' or 'scum' when in a good mood, he didn't want to mess around and play nice. AFAICR he checked out his legal status first (saw a lawyer about his contract) and then contacted the company threatening them with a winding up order if they didn't pay. This would basically do what it says and end the existence of the agency as an entity - instant extinction, no business able to be transacted etc. - basically a 'nuke the bastards' option, perhaps a trifle extreme but he really doesn't like agents.
    Apparently they laughed at him, but when they shared the joke with their legal staff full payment was made immediately.
    He can be a little over the top, and he would probably have been happy to take the loss so long as the other guys came off a lot worse, I think he was disappointed that they coughed up.
    Did I mention that he doesn't like agents?

    I don't know if you have such a mechanism in your state, but if you do a (real) threat to terminate the company is a much bigger stick than garnishing the account - it may be empty, they may just change banks etc. It could be fun to check if you have the ability to do this.

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  11. Collecting a Judgment by ninewands · · Score: 4, Informative

    Once the judgment becomes final and non-appealable, you get the clerk of the court to issue you a Writ of Execution on the judgment, then take that to the Constable for the precinct in which the company's offices are located. The Writ will cost you about $15 and the Constable's service fee will probably be somewhere around $50.00. The Constable will serve the writ and either bring back cash or seized property, which will then be sold at auction and you get your money from the Constable.

    That's all there is to it.

    BTW. IAAL

  12. Ask Somewhere Other Than Slashdot by afabbro · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't mean to be rude, but perhaps the local library has better resources than Slashdot. I'd wager that an afternoon spent perusing books on small claims and how to collect would give you all the information you need.

    Second, you're not the first person to face this. In fact, it's a chronic problem with small claims judgements. Did you ask the court? Did you ask the sheriff? Did you ask the county clerk? Why would you ask Slashdot before asking real (omigosh! meatspace!) people who are on the scene with you?

    Finally, I'd google a bit...30 seconds' work took me to several links on how to collect.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  13. Telco Story by rlp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recall reading some years ago, that a guy in San Francisco was owed money by the local telco (at the time Pac Bell). He won in small claims court, but Pac Bell still ignored him. To make a long story short, the sheriff filed the paper work to sell one of Pac Bell's downtown buildings in order to collect the money. No one else showed, so the the guy ending up buying it for $1. At that point, he got Pac Bell's attention. He ended up selling them back their building for the amount owed plus court costs.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]