Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Next Step in Fighting Spam: Greylisting

Posted by michael on from the ideas-are-a-dime-a-dozen dept.

Evan Harris writes "I've just published a paper on a new and unique spam blocking method called "Greylisting". The best thing about it other than achieving better than 97% effectiveness in blocking spam, is that it practically eliminates the main problem of other solutions: the false-positive. There's even source code for an example implementation written as a perl filter for sendmail, along with instructions for installing, so you can get up and running quickly."

3 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. DON'T CLICK LINKS IN PARENT -- GOATSE.CX by I+am+the+blob · · Score: -1, Troll
    --

    All sweeping generalizations suck.
    1. Re:DON'T CLICK LINKS IN PARENT -- GOATSE.CX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      ãã--Î"ãHDãã sucks

      and so do you! props for the FP (faggoty post)

  2. Sarxpam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    What about sarxpam? Is there any solution to the sarxpam (unsolicited and unwanted sexually-oriented E-mail) epidemic? I'm always receiving offers to enlarge certain parts of my anatomy, watch young teens perform disgusting acts, etc.etc.

    Short of changing my email address, is there any way I can stop them?