Slashdot Mirror


FreeCraft Cease and Desisted by Blizzard

mandreiana writes "As of June 20th, FreeCraft is shut down. The development team received a cease and desist order due to the name 'FreeCraft' causing possible confusion with the names StarCraft and WarCraft, and also some of the ideas within the engine were too similar to WarCraft 2. There will be no more updates to this game, and it is no longer available for download." Way to go, Blizzard, now the only competitors to worry about are the ones who can afford lawyers and actually hold competing market share. Of course, not using a *Craft for a game project might have kept it under the radar a while longer.

8 of 808 comments (clear)

  1. Re:RIAA/MPAA vs Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Shut the fuck up HanzoSan, you fucking idiot.

  2. Please by dh003i · · Score: 1, Troll

    Let's not pretend that the people playing FreeCraft think it was produced by Blizzard.

    Trademark laws are there for the CONSUMERS, not Blizzard.

    Obviously, the consumers want FreeCraft to be named FreeCraft, so blizzard can fuck off and go to hell.

  3. Re:Why not just change it? by _xeno_ · · Score: 1, Troll
    (I'm guessing there's things like similar artwork here, since gameplay mechanics cannot be copyrighted).

    Last time I checked out FreeCraft, not only was there "similar" graphics, there were icons and images ripped straight out of StarCraft. Like various tiles from the grassland StarCraft mapset, likewise with tree "doo-dads" from StarCraft. I think they also flat-out stole a Terran Marine as a unit.

    Creating your own free RTS game is a worthy goal. FreeCraft is attempting to recreate StarCraft or something. FreeCraft was asking for this to happen. My first thought was "it's about time" - I would have expected this to happen a long time ago.

    Maybe some of the FreeCraft code can be resurrected into a truly new game, but not only was the current game not that interesting, it was also a fairly blatant ripoff of StarCraft.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  4. Re:Theres ALOT more than just those two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I rufuse to pay money to linux developers for anything. Dirty hippies like that should go get a real job or investors. Open source games are gay.

  5. Re:Freecraft is a ripoff. INSIGHTFUL!? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: -1, Troll

    It is illegal to freely provide such a close imitaion of a retail game, no matter how low-quality you can make it.

    So what you're saying is that it is illegal for anyone to make a word processor because Microsoft has one?

  6. Re:Freecraft is a ripoff. INSIGHTFUL!? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: -1, Troll

    microsoft word = warcraft II
    Word processor = RTS


    OKay, let me try again. So it should be illegal for someone to write software that can read, modify, and write Microsoft Word formatted documents then?

    the only difference being the graphics

    Or none, as the FreeCraft engine can use the original WC2 graphics if you own a legal copy of WC2. It seems to me that all FreeCraft does is promote the sale of more copies of WC2. It expands the WC2 market into the Linux and Macintosh world. How terrible.

    Maxis owns the whole game. Not just the pretty little pictures.

    So does Blizzard have some sort of patent on a game involving the building of structures and training of units for battle purposes in a game like setting? The FreeCraft project is writing code with clean room techniques. They are looking at how WC2 works from a user's perspective, and trying to implement it in their own code.

    Blizzard have a copyright on WarCraft, not a patent on the concept of a RTS game. Virtually every RTS game out there has the same model as WarCraft does, so why doesn't Blizzard go take out Command & Conquor or any of the others?

  7. Re:Do your own marketing ... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 0, Troll
    Ahhh, I see.

    My problem with Stallman is his hypocrisy at attempting to control the usage of his software when such control is exactly what the GPL is intended to prevent. Stallman's political goals are often served by free software but this incident shows he is obviously willing to sacrifice the spirit of the GPL when the goals of free software clash with his agenda.

    My problem with the FreeCraft guys is that Blizzard owns WarCraft and StarCraft and has not given up any such control. Obviously Blizzard has led the way by having multiple products with the Craft moniker so they are well within their rights to defend it. The FreeCraft guys are just trying to cash in on the ground Blizzard has already staked.

  8. Re:Will You All Remember This? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0, Troll

    What the fuck is a tram?

    And whats the value of free software to someone with enough mony to buy all the commercial software he needs?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.