Slashdot Mirror


Nimble V5 - The OQO Killer?

prostoalex writes "OQO was supposed to be a big advance in the personal computing field, but, alas, made it quick to vaporware list. Now another company will try its luck with a mini-mini-PC. The Register, PC World and MSNBC are all running paragraph-long blurbs about pocket-size Nimble V5 from Nimble Microsystems. The specs are - VIA 733 MHz, 128 DDR266, 30 GB HDD, USB 2.0, PCMCIA, no display, $699, supposed to ship this fall. Full specification available from company's Web site."

120 comments

  1. slow site by crowke · · Score: 1

    I guess the site is hosted on one of their V5's... posted 2 minutes ago on slashdot and already slowing down...

  2. Wow, its small! by Uart · · Score: 3, Funny

    What is the intended market of these babies? I mean, it can't be midgets, we all know from the commercial that Verne Troyer (minime) uses a 17" powerbook.... ...oh, and imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things!

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    1. Re:Wow, its small! by CoolVibe · · Score: 1
      ..oh, and imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things!

      Drat! I wanted to say that! Oh wait, I can top that:

      How about a MOSIX cluster of these!

    2. Re:Wow, its small! by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the intended market seems to be people who want to do video conferencing on the go. though i'm not too sure how big the market for that is

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    3. Re:Wow, its small! by rusty0101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Might I point out that it seems silly to market as a video conference device if it does not have a display. To me that seems to defeat the purpose of video conferencing.

      I am pretty sure that the only way this would work is if it has a composit or s-video out to plug into whatever monitor happens to bey available. Presumably the usb is there to support a camera. (something else to carry around) Along with the Wall-wart, the keyboard/mouse combo, and a 5" lcd tv you need to carry around for locations where you can't plug into an available tv, it kind of defeats the purpose as a video conferencing device.

      With all those requirements, a laptop with a pinhole camera would make more sense.

      Just my observations.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    4. Re:Wow, its small! by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

      How about a MOSIX cluster of these!

      Hey, where have you lived?

      It obviously should read: "How about a openMosix cluster of these!"

      Or better: "How about running clusterKnoppix on these!" :-P

    5. Re:Wow, its small! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Small and purty. I still have a small temptation to go completely retro but I now think I'm being lured to the shiny side of the force.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  3. Broken English by davidstrauss · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Decorate your house with elegant PC"

    The slightly broken English on their main page kind of takes away from the elegant image they seek.

    1. Re:Broken English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what they get for using Babelfish ;)

    2. Re:Broken English by Enonu · · Score: 2, Funny

      This reminds of a lot of Chinese restaurant menus. I swear they do it on purpose. Just they other day I saw the following:

      "Eat our magically delicious food to make tummy happy."
      "Succulent tasty bites with choice ingredient and orange."

      It makes me want to open up a restaurant with descriptions like:

      "Disgusting old meat that make you barf long time."
      "Like dog shit on hot road it make you gag."

      Hint: if you want to sell a product, hire somebody to check your grammar and spelling.

    3. Re:Broken English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hint: if you want to be thought of as a xenophobic idiot, you're on the right track!

    4. Re:Broken English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe. someone should tell Quark that, looking at their advert for XPress on apple.com

  4. OQO doesn't need the help... by praetorian_x · · Score: 1

    Seems to me like OQO is killing itself just fine without any help.

    I've wanted one for a year and a half, but the ever-receding launch date has gotten out of hand. I know they were accepting pre-orders at some point. Wonder if those people will ever see an OQO or thier money...

    In concept, of course, the idea just rocks.

    Cheers,
    prat

    1. Re:OQO doesn't need the help... by kamikazichaser · · Score: 2, Informative

      I fell in love with the OQO concept as soon as I saw it. It's a pity that complications arose. I recently contacted OQO for an update, and got this response: Hi Jason and thanks for your interest in OQO. Yes - yes - yes - the product is definitely coming out. We are planning a major product launch in mid-September at PC Expo in NYC. Let me know if I can answer any specific questions. Regards, Steve Halland This was received on 06/10/03

  5. I always wanted to.. by nano2nd · · Score: 2, Funny

    .."Workout the task without noisy PC" and whats more, it comes with "New life style".

    Where do I sign up??

    1. Re:I always wanted to.. by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      "New life style"

      Cant see the point of these things really but if the new Life Style is that of a pr0n star I will probably buy one.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:I always wanted to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell you what, I'll split the cost with you.

      I'll give you half the price of the Nible V5, and you take my wife. That way we both get the new lifestyle, you can keep the hardware.

    3. Re:I always wanted to.. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
      "and whats more, it comes with "New life style".

      Hey.....i'm sure MANY people on slashdot would be willing to buy a new computer that gave them "New life style".

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  6. High price? by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

    The specs are - VIA 733 MHz, 128 DDR266, 30 GB HDD, USB 2.0, PCMCIA, no display, $699
    What kind of OS do they run? It must be Windows, unless it's some 'hyper-engineered' one they build themselves, you can get the hardware for about $400-500 in the USA, AFAIK.

    Site is down so I couldn't check...

    1. Re:High price? by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      RTFA (the register one) - it runs XP. and you can't get the hardware in that size though. that's the point.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    2. Re:High price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder the price is so high... you can bet thet 25% of that price tag comes from Windows Embedded (tm) that comes with it.

  7. Excuse me, if I may by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the dillio with these "mini computers".

    The whole reason desktops are so honking huge is because they have these PCI slot thingies you can cram shit in. If you really want to make a small computer do all surface mount stuff and dispense with the user upgradeable slots. I mean the PCI/AGP slots on an ATX mobo take up close to 1/2 of the mobo. If you removed them ... voila smaller board and smaller case required.

    Aside from the fact nobody makes computers like this [e.g. no third world labour setup to manufacture them yet] why is this such a special thing? I mean we have the technology in this day and age todo it.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Excuse me, if I may by lpret · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Getting rid of PCI/AGP slots only help with size, but it does nothing for less power required and less heat. By not having as much heat, your CPU can potentially run fanless, taking a lot of bulk out of the PC. Perhaps you can't think of a reason you need one, but that doesn't mean someone else doesn't.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    2. Re:Excuse me, if I may by SubjunctiveSam · · Score: 0

      e.g. no third world labour setup to manufacture them yet

      i.e.
      abbr. Latin

      id est (that is).

      e.g.
      abbr. Latin.

      exempli gratia (for example).

      You should have used the former abbreviation and not the latter. That's strike one.

      Strike two is that you're an idiot. Chopping the pci slots off of an ATX motherboard does not make it suitable to be used in a mobile device.

      Strike three is that your website is ugly. Don't give some lame excuse like "I'm redoing it from scratch." You might as well put up an animated gif of a guy in a yellow hard hat.

    3. Re:Excuse me, if I may by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      You don't need PCI slots if everything is onboard.

      And my iahu.ca site is deprecated. The cool shit is at libtomcrypt.org where I could care less for aesthetics as long as the links work.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Excuse me, if I may by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      That's 'wat da dilly, yo?', jive turkey.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  8. But why? by orangesquid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why spend $700 on it, when you could spend $400 on an equally-powered, larger (not as easy to lose, sturdy/rugged), and easier to repair, maintain, and upgrade, system?

    Unless these things become as common cell phones, there won't be much point to them, except for some very "sophisticated" businessmen.

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    1. Re:But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, i believe if you're that retarded then you don't deserve it.

      The machine, I mean.

    2. Re:But why? by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My point is... the small size isn't a good enough benefit to justify all the problems with having such a small machine.

      Consider a modern microprocessor. It is easily replaceable. If it were hard to find replacements for, people would complain about not being able to repair the circuitry inside themselves when their processor fried. When computers were still a rare thing, processors took up entire cabinets, but if any small piece should fail, that individual piece could be repaired or replaced.

      Miniaturization brings both benefits and consequences. If these things reach mass production, though, it may not be such a problem. Would you really spend $700 for something that small and hard-to-replace? Dumbass.

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    3. Re:But why? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'm OT, but this sentiment reminds me of this girl that loved to skydive. We'd ask her "admit it; you're doing this because you love the thrill of risking death."

      She'd say: "If you're so stupid that you f' up and can't land correctly and got yourself killed, then it's your own damn fault. You deserved it."

      No malice, just: saying: you're a damn fool who deserved it. I LOVE that attitude. I know I'm gonna read about her going splat one of these decades or other though. Just like everybody I know with a motorcycle eventually has that story where they hurt their back unusually severely but they don't usually die. It just goes with the territory.

      I just love the attitude of: do it, or you f'd up and didn't do it. Either way, it's your own damn fault. More people should think like that.

    4. Re:But why? by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      I don't know why the hell I got modded troll, I certainly wasn't trying to troll. All I'm saying is that some people may want these. Some people may want to spend more for something smaller. What is wrong with that? I wouldn't ever give up my computer for one of those queer little things, but I'm sure there are people out there who would.
      I don't think it's a matter of replaceability of components. It shouldn't be much different than fixing a tv or a vcr. And people spend much more than $700 for small things all the time(audiophiles come to mind). Size has nothing to do with how expensive it is. And how is this hard to replace? Buy another one if it breaks.

    5. Re:But why? by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

      $700 for something small and hard to replace? Like jewelry? Are diamonds a frivolous purchase to you?

      Seriously, you're declaring the whole product idea bankrupt because it doesn't meet your personal cost/value equation. To me, the heat and noise generated by the latest generation of processors and video cards really make them too annoying to buy, even if they would double the performance of my computer. I place a much higher value on my environment than my computer's performance. You, apparently, place a higher value on cost of repair than size or portability. Neither judgement is right or wrong, simply personal choice. The good news is that we can make those choices individually rather than having a one-size fits all solution shoved down our throats. Compare that to, say, 15 years ago when pretty much any PC you bought was a beige desktop with little variation to distinguish office machines from home machines.

    6. Re:But why? by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      Seems some moderators can't tell passionate responses or heated discussion from trolling and flaming :)

      There's something about convenience that seems really important to some people... I wouldn't give up my computer either, but I guess I'm not part of the intended market.

      Some people may be able to spend $700 on something this small, but I just know that small, delicate electronics are tough to take care of. If it was $300, I wouldn't object so much, because I wouldn't mind spending another $300 if it broke.

      Btw, TVs and VCRs used to be a lot easier to fix before the age of solid-state components in everything ;)

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  9. USB 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is that fullspeed or high speed?

    --
    What do you wan't to learn today?

    1. Re:USB 2.0 by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

      USB 1.1 == Full Speed
      USB 2.0 == Hi-Speed

      Those retard marketeers...
      They can't even spell 'high'.

    2. Re:USB 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, thank you for solidifiying the situation that "USB FULL SPEED OR HIGH SPEED?" is the new Karma Whore Phrase(tm).

      How this works: every time the story even makes a passing glance at USB, you mention "Is that 2.0 high speed or 2.0 full speed???" and gain INSTANT KARMA, as the clueless mod you up, thinking that Orrin Hatch is reading and taking note.

      This brought to you by our previous Karma Whore Phrase(tm) success stories, "This would violate the DMCA" and "Isn't this a violation of the GPL?"

    3. Re:USB 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's an oversimplification. The usual terminology is:

      USB 1.1 == USB 2.0
      USB 2.0 == USB 2.0

    4. Re:USB 2.0 by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Does that make it "hello" speed instead?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  10. Re:apparently by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If I had mod points I'd mod you "hella redundant".

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  11. Why? by jcsehak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not trying to troll here, I really want to know why anyone would get one, besides the coolness factor. I mean, if you need something small and quiet, you get a laptop. If you need maximum expandability (PCI slots, room for a big fancy heatsink, etc.), you get a tower system. When you add a $200 display, the price tag goes to $900. That's how much an iBook costs. I'm sure there are even cheaper laptops on the PC side. This seems like the worst of both worlds.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Why? by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Simple. They want or need one. Supply and demand baby.

      Where would you use one? For say, an entertainment centre... or in a studio (1 room apt) or other tight spaces. I don't like having 4 full size computers under my desk, PLUS my mac. Getting 4 of these would free up MUCHO space.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    2. Re:Why? by robslimo · · Score: 1

      I could see this working well (size-wise) in embedded applications... if it had a little IO.

      But that doesn't seem to be their target and there are already products (most notably PC/104Plus) that fit the bill quite nicely.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...in your WALLET!

    4. Re:Why? by slittle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nothing's free dude. VIA processors have the computational power of a crooked slide rule - you'd need at least a dozen of them to equal your current capacity.

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, it doesnt make sense as a full fledged windows pc. as a print/file server for dummies who cant set up a samba box it does.

    6. Re:Why? by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      giving them to me would also free up the space ;]

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    7. Re:Why? by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      As one may say, you get what you pay for. If you need something small and uber-fast, then you go for something that's small and uber-fast. If i wanna host an internal webserver, imap and dns for my domain and my household... it'll prolly hold up fine.

      If i need something to host something that intense, go with mini-atx or something.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    8. Re:Why? by mdielmann · · Score: 2, Informative

      I mean, if you need something small and quiet, you get a laptop.

      I beg to differ. When the fan on my Thinkpad kicks in, it's almost as loud as my desktop. Considering it's 18" from my head, as opposed to the >36" for my desktop, I wouldn't call it a quiet solution.

      I'm thinking of getting a fanless computer for my next desktop. I don't do a lot of gaming where I need the high-end CPUs, and value silence more than unused clock cycles. OTOH, I'll probably build my own in the faint hope of saving a few bucks - and having a clue what's happening in there...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    9. Re:Why? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I know this is OT for the story, but I have my server in another room, and all my other computers are all P133 Dells with no fan as xterms. My lab is whisper quiet except the AC. I play, like, zero games, so it's a perfect setup for me.

    10. Re:Why? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was thinking of that as an alternative to paying the premium for a quietdesktop computer, but I work in a Windows environment :( and running Citrix or Terminal Services is such a PITA. It doesn't seem to matter how much you throw at it, it never runs fast enough for you to forget the lag...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  12. how come everyone gets crazy about .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some assembled mini pc.
    and whats that crap about the vaporware thingy ?

    the parts to build one have been available for a long time at www.mini-itx.com.
    i dont care about a company selling pre assembled via itx machines, looks too much like a slashvertisement.

  13. Anything running VIA... by Ransak · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... doesn't inspire confidence in me with their past track record of problems. Given my past experience with the Asus AV7266, I steer clear of all products using their chips.

    --
    "Powers. I have them."
  14. mini-mini? by viware · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, 7.5x7.5x2 inches is not my definition of fitting in the palm of my hand. Thats bigger than the drive bay mini computers.

  15. Full specs from website by Ricin · · Score: 4, Informative

    CPU: VIA C3 Eden 733MHz

    Memory: 128MB DDR266 SODIMM (expandable to 512MB)

    Hard Drive: 30GB

    Display Support: 1280x1024 maximum selectable resolution and up to 32-bit color

    Audio: AC 97 compatible, Built-in Microphone, 3W
    Amplifier, 4Ohm speaker, 3.5mm stereo jack x 2 (Ear/Mic Jack)

    Front button: V5/PC switch button, Two Channels indicator, Volume Control Knob, Mic mute Button
    Status Indicator: V5 channel (Blue); PC channel (Orange)

    Power: Output: 18V DC, 3.4A, Input: Auto-sensing 100-240VAC, 50-60Hz Universal

    I/O ports: USB (2.0) x 4, Ethernet Port x 2, PS/2 x 4, VGA x 2

    Network Connectivity: IEEE 802.3 10/100BaseT x2
    IEEE 802.11 Wireless PCMCIA

    Operation System: Windows XP Home Edition / Professional Edition

    Dimensions (W x D x H): 5.2 x 19.5 x 19.5 (cm), 2â x 7.7â x 7.7â (in)

    Expansion Slot: PCMCIA Type II slot x1

    Weight: 2.2lbs/1.0kg

    Operation Environment: Temperature: 32ÂF to 97ÂF (0ÂC to 36ÂC), Humidity: 20% to 80% (non-condensation)

    Accessories: Power adapter, Ethernet Cable, KVM cable, User Manual

    Regulatory Approvals: FCC, UL, CE

    -----
    Looks interesting for someone who likes to carry her PC with her and her monitor on his back

    1. Re:Full specs from website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KARMA WHORE@#%#$^%#$%^

    2. Re:Full specs from website by io333 · · Score: 1

      My Fujitsu P1120 has more or less similar specs, weighs the same, and comes with a beautiful touch screen display.

    3. Re:Full specs from website by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

      Here, links that do work (as yours doesn't seem to):

      Fujitsu P1120
      And the Froogle Search (both results were $1199.99)

    4. Re:Full specs from website by lnoble · · Score: 1

      not too bad. not too good either. then again the site is down so I haven't been impressed yet with its compactness.

      The one thing I don't understand is why they put ps/2 ports in it and 4 at that. I would think that in trying to achieve a minimal form factor they would do away with the legacy/unneccesary connectors that just take up room. Why would anyone use serial for keyboards/mice anyway? Apple hasn't for 5 for so years and they seem to be coping well. USB should have completely replaced it years ago, in all PC's.

      I actually like the mini pc concept though. To make it viable it should have a much higher cost/practicality ratio than this to a laptop. I see it being used more as an embedded solution for presentations, or just having a small box to doing webdev stuff on, separate from a main system. Personally I would opt for a laptop, but it still could have a market, albeit a small one

    5. Re:Full specs from website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My gut sense is that it is just a mini-itx mb in a small case. There are plenty of tiny PCs available already that are powered off of 110. As far as being inovative or interesting, hardly, it's just another offshore vendor trying to tart up their badge engineered crap.

      I was (am?) really looking forward to the OQO. As far as I'm concerned the perfect portable PC is about the size and weight of an eBook, has no keyboard but operates portably via touch screen kbd or sytus. Has no cdrom/floppy internal, but does have compact flash slot(s). And, has a very cheap dock that you can plug a kbd/mouse into.

      Portably, you should be able to use it as an mp3 player with minimal need for the display/had drive to conserve power. I also want a couple of dedicated buttons ergonomically placed so I can use it easily as an eBook.

      It must be able to run linux. That is, I would care if you could only use its portable features only with windows (xp/ce/whatever) so long as you could dual boot it into linux once it's in the cradle. When you set it in the dock you can either use it horizontally or vertically and the screen automatically flips its orientation.

      As a student this seems about perfect. I can take notes in class using it like a tablet. I can plop it in the cradle at work and use it horizantally for most stuff, or pop it around vertically for word processing. You could limit resolution to 600x800, or 800x600 if it kept the cost down. I can throw the thing in my back pack and use it as an mp3 player when I'm on the go. I can pop it out and use it as a day planner/address book.

      When I get home, I pop it in the cradle at home and it takes very little space on my desk.

      The current crop of handhelds are too small. Their screens are too small and they don't have hard drives. Laptops are too big and fragile. I have an iBook but it's more screen than I really need in most situations where I need portablility, and, it weighs too much for my book bag.

      It should be about 2.5 to 3 lbs at the most, about 5x7x1 to 6x8x1.5 inches and have something on the order of 4+ hours of battery life with the ideal goal being 12+ hours of mixed use life.

      I'm willing to give up a lot of performance for this so one of the really low power chips running at a few hundred mghz is just fine.

      It shouldn't cost much more than about $750 and I'd buy one right this second for $500.

      I think that is the ideal consumer portable I don't want a shitload of gadgets. I don't want a too tiny handheld pretending to be a pc, I don't want a damn phone that computes, I want a small portable computer that has the necessary components for good portable document reading and music playing but does not lack the capability to behave as a reasonably usable pc.

      that's my nickels worth

  16. Case is small indeed... by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

    Okay checked the Register article:

    The V5 measures 19.3 x 19.3 x 5cm (7.7 x 7.7 x 2in)

    Uhm, well the EPIA motherboards are 17 cm x 17 cm, so I checked Froogle and mini-itx.com but indeed I couldn't find cases that wrap around the mobo that tightly.

    But maybe somebody can enlighten us?

    1. Re:Case is small indeed... by lowmagnet · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about the LexSystem? Or perhaps the Travla? I think both fit the bill nicely. The LexSystem is a bit tighter than the Travla, but for some reason I find the Travla very HURRR

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  17. Looks like... by stubear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...yet another piece of technology looking for a use instead of filling an actual need.

  18. Nice idea, but... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...judging by the spesifications is isn't much more than one of the lower-power mini-itx motherboards from VIA and some bundled perhipals.

    So why not do as the good people over at mini-itx.com and roll your own? You may not save all that much money on it, but you can get a system thats tailormade for your needs and absolutly one of a kind... or you can molest some poor old computer and pimp it out with some new, faster hardware.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  19. Could Too! Could Not! by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    How does one unavailable product kill another unavailable product? Sounds like Marketing has been reduced the school yard taunts about whos favorite super hero could beat up the others.

  20. are you dense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the larger something is the more difficult it is to put in your pocket. The point here is mobility and functionality greater than current pocket computers.

    1. Re:are you dense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't understand why everybody is obsessed with On-the-go everything. We need cell phones because we don't want to have to find a payphone. We need palmtops and laptops because we don't want to wait until we get to our office or our house to work. We need fast food because restaurants take too long.

      We are surrounded by so much convenience... but are our lives really so bad that we couldn't live without these things, or are we just impatient?

  21. Yes, but... by macemoneta · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ...Is it USB 2.0 Full Speed or High Speed?

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  22. You misunderstand them by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    They're merely asking you to be more Politically Correct.

  23. RTFWP by kinnell · · Score: 1
    I really want to know why anyone would get one

    Look at the advert - you will attract beautiful blond women, who will want to drape themselves ecstatically over your nimble.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  24. this is totally different from an OQO! by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How is this supposed to be an OQO killer? Granted, I can't get through to the site- it's 'dotted. However, I've seen the specs as posted here, and to me- as a person who really wants an OQO bad- it doesn't look like it'd replace the OQO.

    Mostly, this thing doesn't have a display. Or touch screen. Making it a portable computer, but not a palmtop. The OQO is cool for a number of reasons, but one of them is that it is a real and quite fast machine in the form factor of a PDA. Yet, it can be "converted" into a real desktop or real laptop using docking stations. With an OQO, you can slip it into the docking station and expand it with a new AGP video card or new PCI cards. This is just a low-lower mini-ATX board. Nothing that special, although I'm sure there are some folks who would find the V5 useful.

    I mean, this Nimble thing doesn't even run on a battery. It is very portable, in that it's small enough to take your office machine to and from home, keeping monitor, keyboard, etc at each location.

    The only thing I've seen that comes close to being an OQO killer- but is just as much vaporware- is the MCC, or the Mobile Computer Core. Like the OQO, you can slip it into a number of "docks," making it a PDA, a notebook, or a desktop. I'd rather have the MCC's PDA over an OQO because it has a bigger screen but without being too big, but such dreaming is worthless when no one will make one of these...

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  25. Re:apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your sig should read, "The preceeding comment was complete and utter flamebait and should be modded as such."

    its clearer.

  26. Not like OQO by mocm · · Score: 1

    It has no display, so it is not at all like OQO.
    BTW, the display shortage is the only thing that is still delaying the OQO launch.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    1. Re:Not like OQO by kamikazichaser · · Score: 1

      see my post above, but they're saying that they're launching at PC Expo.

  27. Hush-Technologies by Jagasian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hush Tech makes a far better tiny computer that is also completely silent (except when using the DVD/CD drive). It looks allot nicer too, when used as a set-top box. The thing is powerful enough to be a DIVX/MP3 player, but it can also double as a TiVo or emulation based console gaming system.

    1. Re:Hush-Technologies by pointwood · · Score: 1

      I considered one of those as they are really cool, but sadly, they are way to expensive :(

  28. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS A DILLIO, ASSHAT? by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Troll

    Can't we be friends?

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  29. There are others by w3weasel · · Score: 1

    This one has been in development for a long time, and might yet solidify itself from the vapor surrounding the project.

    http://minipc.vulcan.com/default.asp

    --

    Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

  30. nicer C3 machines out there by 73939133 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you just want a small, light, portable PC, I think something like the Hush PC is a better choice.

    If you want something smaller, you can get systems that fit into a drive bay here.

  31. tablet by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    oqo now has to compete against the tablet pc. pda's are becomoing more powerful. cell phones are becoming pda's. this is not a market i would want to compete in, but is facinating none the less.

    btw, how does a computer the size of a large book compete with something like a tablet which can fit in your pocket? poor comparison!

  32. one word... by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

    Ug-ly!
    No, that thing wouldn't look good anywhere in my opinion, but then I do prefer the simple, square, black boxes. And the one I bought was cheaper as well...

    --
    home
  33. Not so impressive considering... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yellow dog Linux has had similarly sized Ultra small machines called the "briQ" for a long time now.

    The only real difference here is that this "Nimble" thing is x86 compatible. whoop-tee doo.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    1. Re:Not so impressive considering... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      The nimble is also half the price, and price differences are important for someone looking for a machine to use as a living room media box.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  34. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm in the market for a tiny computer, does anyone know how this compares to Cappuccino PCs?

    --
    [o]_O
  35. At long last!!! by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    I can finally Workout the task without noisy PC!!

    Although I'm still unclear on how Internet shrinking the world?

    Oh well.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  36. Nothing new... by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1

    These are smaller(Dimension: 150mm x 106mm x 32mm (6" x 4" x 1.25")), cheaper ($499), have higher clockspeeds, have TV/VGA out, touchpad, but no cd, ... and can be bought online, even without windows (+ $125).

    Exists since at least 2 years

    1. Re:Nothing new... by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Yes, but capuccinos have fans, and are damn noisy.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  37. The problem with the VIA CPU is performance... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's okay, but unless you're talking about their 1GHz version, the performance is mediocre at best. The 733 MHz CPU compares favoribly on integer operations when compared to an equivalently clocked Celeron (About 1.25 times faster on average- mostly due to the higher FSB...) but is only about half as good as a Celeron on floating point operations. This is because the FPU is underclocked on all but the Nehemiah cores (1GHz and above...) by half the clock speed of the CPU.

    The power consumption's great, but you need to be aware of the tradeoffs for that reduction in power- especially in the case of the earlier C3 cores. You want to use this as a set-top box machine or maybe as a home theatre PC if you're not planning on doing majorly strenuous things with it. As a business PC, it will do okay so long as you're doing something like worprocessing as your predominant task. Spreadsheets are going to drag miserably with this machine offering. A Nehemiah core machine would present itself well in the context of an office PC and while their price is MUCH higher than it ought to be for such a machine.

    Fry's sells the 1GHz motherboards for about $140, the memory would set you back $60-120 depending on how much, a hard disk will set you back another $50-120 depending on what you bought, the special case for the new form factor motherboard will set you back $60-80.

    So, doing the math, $310 is the base price for a better machine in a similar size factor.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  38. Whoops... Forgot something in that figure... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    A DVD drive runs something like $50 or so for a decent one not on sale. So, the price is more like something along the lines of $360. Still quite a bit less than the $700 that this bunch is asking for it. I don't believe in paying THAT much a premium for "smaller" unless it brings something along with it like Laptops usually do.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  39. You'll actually save some money if you DIY... by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Informative

    EPIA-M10000 motherboard : $140
    mini-ITX case (basic): $60
    128Mb of DDR RAM: $60
    40Gb HD: $50
    16x DVD: $50

    Total cost: $360

    That's all it takes to make a basic business PC these days. It won't be a barn burner, but it will do the job nicely no matter what OS you choose, 98, Me, 2000, XP, *BSD, or Linux.

    (OT: The "lameness" filter is really lame...)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  40. Nimble Microsystems = Nimble Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nimbletech Search on Google

    Just do a search on nimbletech and you'll see the history of heart and headache you may find yourself falling into. Nimble Technology resurfaced a few times as different Nimble* names, but the same old bull. Defective hardware, non existant customer service, they sold me a monitor that was either broken before it left their warehouse or during shipment (arrived 2 months late on top of that), and it wasn't even the right monitor! it took me weeks of calls in order to get anything taken care of.

    you might be better off staying away, if this is the same company.

    just check this out for an example

  41. So what is new or special here ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this system any different from the Lex Lite except that it appears to be windows only ?

    http://www.lex.com.tw/case-light.htm

    (or www.linitx.com for the UK supplier)

    Alan
    (awaiting the SV823A's arrival in the UK)

  42. I have a better Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Try a Sony U101

    Mod me up if this makes you drool :)

    Sure it comes only with Japanese Win XP, but who cares when you're just going to send it to the big bit bucket in the sky where it belongs anyway? RH9 installs nicely.

  43. Confidence in corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And does Intel inspire confidence in you since the Pentium FDIV bug?

    I have seen so many problems with so many computers that I'm confident that someone who trust a company based on its past record is simply naive. In the same way, if someone refuse to consider any products from a company because of its past record then I'm confident this person is a fool.

    BTW, I was bitten by the KT133 DMA bug and at first I thought I'd never buy anything from VIA and Creative Labs again (not because of their faulty produts but because they both lied about it). Well, guess what... two months ago I had to buy a new motherboard and, after reading a lot of reviews, I decided to go with a motherboard with a KT333.

  44. Lookout for SCO lawsuits! by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    OQO reminds me of SCO!

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  45. Do they sell 'bare'? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I.E. no 'windows tax'.

    Something like this would make a wonderful mini server to carry around, but would hate to pay the extra $ for windows just to erase it..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  46. NO MORE VIA DAMMIT!!! by evilviper · · Score: 1
    The specs are - VIA 733 MHz

    Why in the hell does everyone use VIA's processor in everything now? It's just about the most underpowered processor I've ever seen (and I've been involved in integrated/embedded processor integration and programming for years, so I've seen a lot of low-power processors).

    The 800MHz C3 system I bought from Walmart (and later returned) was so underpowered that it couldn't even play a DVD without jumming (or seriously lowering the quality). Perhaps there are some optomizations that allow it to perform better, but obviously it couldn't be much better.

    If you want a cheap, low power processor, why not get a lower MHz Intel/AMD notebook processor? My 1.2GHz Intel notebook processor has a tiny heatsink, and a extremely small, very quiet fan, yet the heatsink is only warm to the touch even after hours and hours of Divx encoding and compiling. I'm sure a larger heatsink could be used, or just a silent fan.

    Please OEMs, use decent processors. People aren't stupid... They might fall for the inflated MHz ratings for a while, but not for long. It really ruins your reputation quickly.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:NO MORE VIA DAMMIT!!! by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Except the M10000 is the Nehemiah, which sports extreme advances over the 800. M10Ks have full speed copros now, and a Multimedia chipset with hardware decoding of DVD video, plus a electronic noise based random number generator. Via chipsets are also used because they still consume half the wattage of their Pentium-M 'competition*'

      * in quotes because the boards don't realy compete with each other. The VIA chipsets are for embedded systems, not laptops. Also, the VIAs were designed ground-up for low power consumption, instead of being designed down from a high-wattage chipset.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  47. *4* PS/2 Ports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anybody tell me what on earth you could possibly need 4 PS/2 ports for? If you're olde worlde then Mouse and Keyboard take up 2, but the other two?

    And then there's the minor matter of 2 ethernet ports. Surely it would be WAY more cost-effective for the target market to put only 2 ethernet port in. All I'm saying is the specs are enough to weird me out already.

  48. Re:apparently by norhtec · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know this might be a selfish post but it is appropriate. I am president of a company called NorhTec. We are shipping a small, fanless computer and have been since February. Several people have told me they tried to get our slashdotted but the posts were rejected. There are several reasons why people would buy these smaller products. Most of them are designed as standalone embedded solutions. They can be used to drive everything from medical equipment or even musical insturments. They can play a role in robotics are be used for large remote deployments. One of the major uses we are finding is for instermentation. People use these computers to take measurements. There are many places where space is a premium. Automobiles, oil rigs, ships, trains, planes and busses are some examples. Laptops are often used for these applications but if the application doesn't require a screen (such as a gateway or firewall) then a microserver will do the job more efficiently.

  49. Can somebody explain? by CowBovNeal · · Score: 1

    It has "USB (2.0) x 4, Ethernet Port x 2, PS/2 x 4, VGA x 2".

    4 USB ports are fine..
    but 2 ethernet ports - proxy server??,
    4 ps/2 ports - 1 mouse, 1 keyboard, rest??
    2 vga ports - ?!

    I haven't heard of a weirder configuration than this before.

    --
    Bush is on fire and its not good for my lungs.
  50. Via by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It still needs a human Computer Device. and of course FrogPad is it!

  51. VIA C3 is crap... by YE · · Score: 1

    And don't even mention "low power consumption". To make up for it's performance this thing would have to generate electricity.

  52. 1/2 the features of the OQO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lets see, its slower (VIA cpus are much slower per Mhz than a TM5800 Crusoe), it has less ram, and doesn't have a display. since when does this compete with OQO?

    besides, OQO build prototypes. they were nifty. but what anyone would use them for or why they would actually buy them was still a mystery. three customers does not a product make. 50,000 customers and you've got something...