Slashdot Mirror


Chip Firm Hit By 45-Year-Old Patent

JPMH writes "The Register is reporting that a Taiwanese chip foundry is being sued over two chemistry patents, one over 45 years old. The patents at issue were filed in 1957 and 1964, but are still in force because they were not granted until 1987 and 1992 respectively. The first patent, 4,702,808, details an apparatus and method for initiating chemical reactions by focusing "radiant energy, such as a laser" onto streams of particles. The second patent, 5,131,941 also details an apparatus and method for initiating chemical reactions, but this time radiation is used to provide the energy kick needed to get the compounds to interact."

5 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. Re:deploy patents! by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You are partially correct the laser was "officially" invented in 1958 - however the maser was invented in 1953 (microwaves instead of visible light) The laser was at the time a predictable outgrowth - and was theorized to be possible. The patent in question mentions radiation in general, as well as lasers radiation. So while it seems amazing that somone could have that much foresight, its not improbable.

  2. Re:With a Friggin Deathgrip on Government by FFFish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ever notice that most of those people who are in power are ex-lawyers?

    Ever notice that contract language has grown increasingly more complicated over the years, as a means of ensuring lawyer income?

    Ever notice the increase in responsibility-declaiming lawsuits over the years, as lawyers take any bullshit to court as a means of ensuring their income?

    Ever notice that judges are allowing more and more of these cases, as a means to ensure their continued employment?

    It's the slow death of a society, crushed by the weight of a useless population of lawyers who can only feed off the harm they cause to others.

    We want to save ourselves, we gotta fire up those frickin laser beams already. Time for some BBQ!

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  3. Re:deploy patents! by DarkMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'll go further than the above poster.

    If the patent mentioned lasers (albeint by description, rather than by name) in 1957 then by Jove, that's worth a patent.

    The advantages of using collimated and coherent light over other light sources in a chamical reaction are great, and certinally non-obvious back then.

    The only thing I don't like about this patent is the submarine laywering over it. The content is quite reasonable, if not somewhat out of date.

  4. Re:With Friggin Laster Beams... by kcbrown · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yeah, you're a communist. You think economies are zero-sum games.

    I have no idea what one (communism) has to do with the other (whether or not the economy is a zero-sum game).

    But the global economy, at any rate, is a zero-sum game, with two exceptions:

    • changes in the population
    • changes in productivity (the amount of production generated by an individual in a period of time. So making people work longer hours does not increase productivity because they're spending more time in order to accomplish more work, whereas having them tend a machine that produces ten times what they could do by hand is an increase in productivity)

    After accounting for those two things, the global economy must be a zero-sum game because money is a direct representation of human production. Were this not the case, you wouldn't get inflation (an overall increase in the prices of goods) as a direct result of printing more money.

    Now, the individual local economies are not zero-sum games, but that is only because they have external inputs and outputs, such as foreign trade and foreign investment.

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  5. Re:deploy patents! by mpe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the patent mentioned lasers (albeint by description, rather than by name) in 1957 then by Jove, that's worth a patent.

    The MASER was invented before then. The only difference between a MASAR and a LASER is the frequency of the EM radiation.

    The advantages of using collimated and coherent light over other light sources in a chamical reaction are great, and certinally non-obvious back then.

    It's long been known that "light" can affect chemical reactions. e.g. photography.
    The idea that monochromatic light would be best for catalysing a specific reaction probably crossed someone's mind as soon as the "photon model" was accepted.