Slashdot Mirror
Law Professor Examines SCO Case
An anonymous submitter writes "This law professor from the University of California points out weakness in SCO's legal bluster, and further takes a poke at closed software, for those hungry for more SCO scraps. At the end, he references Slashdot for more info ('itself a demonstration of the power of dispersed individuals working together')."
We've got grounds for a huge lawsuit. It's obvious that in bad faith the University Professor is attempting to slashdot slashdot. He even included a direct link to our homepage. Untold damage!
Sue! Sue! Someone, call SCO!
I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
It's also their greatest strength.
thank God the internet isn't a human right.
At the end, he references Slashdot for more info ('itself a demonstration of the power of dispersed individuals working together')."
Now, if only we could breed, we would rule the world! Muh ha ha ha!
I attack the darkness.
GeekNights!
Late Night Radio for Geeks!
Well, there went his credibility...
Sure, the federal government wouldn't let old Brigham retain governership of Utah when it became a state, but wouldn't it by nice if we could install the guy as head of SCO? Even as a man who's been dead for more than a century, he could probably run that ship better than its current leadership.
he references Slashdot for more info ('itself a demonstration of the power of dispersed individuals working together').
I though slashdot was a 'demonstration of dispersed individuals procrastinating together'.
Who knew I was demonstrating power all this time?
This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.