Slashdot Mirror


FreeBSD 802.11a/g Support

ByTor-2112 writes "If you are like me, you feel like the "next generation" 802.11 technology was leaving the group of people who got the revolution started in the first place -- the Linux/BSD network enthusiasts -- out in the cold. Well No more. With help from Atheros Comunications, Sam Leffler has built a new 802.11 layer for BSD and drivers for the Atheros chipsets (which are found on many of your 11a/g cards). A Linux version of the driver is here. I will certainly make sure to recommend these supported cards to all my friends."

2 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. *BSD is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dying

  2. Re:for linux too! by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Linux is about being the best tool for multiple jobs, so if someoen else with a usable license does something that the linux userbase would enjoy, it gets thrown into linux.

    Free and Open BSD(not sure about Net, as I don't follow it) on the other hand are about doing things the traditional(read: archaic) BSD way. When faced with the choices of A) do something current to help usability or B) do things the way we've been doing them since 1980, the [FO]BSD maintainers always choose B.

    As a result of that enforced old/hard to use standard, [FO]BSD's main userbase are the skillless kiddies that just use BSD because of the implied elitism -- They think that if it's hard to use and they can use it, They must be better. Unfortunately explaining to them that all it means is they choose the path of wasted time is near impossible.

    For the record: I've admined an OpenBSD free shell provider (brained, for anyone keeping track), a FreeBSD based hosting provider, and now multiple servers for a different hosting provider, all running Debian Linux. At home I've ran OpenBSD 2.9, FreeBSD 4.2, Slackware, Gentoo, Debian, And a variety of others.

    --
    Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx