NAI Sending "Sniffer" C&D Letters
RayMarron writes "It seems that NAI's IP lawyers have been billing some hours recently by sending nastygrams asking companies/individuals to stop using their trademarked term 'Sniffer.' Steve Gibson of Gibson Research Corporation has received one. The full text is posted on his news server, and I'm sure one of our readers will post it here. Or visit news.grc.com, grc.news and grc.news.feedback groups. A student at Stanford received one as well and forwarded it to the faculty to handle. Both Gibson (relating a conversation with his IP attorneys) and Stanford's reply seem to agree that 'sniffer' is too generic a term to be a viable trademark and can't be effectively enforced. Is there an IP lawyer in the house?"
Well, if that is not cutting off one's own nose to despite one's face....
Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
Dear NAI,
We believe *you* are infringing on *our* trademark. Our ability to "sniff" is our livelihood. Not to mention, we hold prior art for any kind of "sniffing."
We will see you in court.
Sincerely,
Drug-Sniffing Canines
But, in fairness, I think someone actually trademarked "Apple" too! I'm not sure on this: I have heard that there is a computer company with this name, but I can't find them in stores and I don't know anyone who has one.
It seems that NAI's IP lawyers have been billing some hours recently by sending nastygrams asking companies/individuals to stop using their trademarked term 'Sniffer.'
That's ridiculous! It would be like, I dunno, Ralph Lauren suing the U.S. Polo Association, claiming that Polo clothes owned the name of the sport.
Oh, wait, Ralph Lauren did do that.
Of course, he didn't win.
Oh wait, he did win:
Opinions on the Twiddler2 hand-held keyboard?
It is time for us to register Network. Then we can surely get some $$$ from NAI (an a whole lot of others)!
So the plan is:
1. Register Network
2. Sue everyone
3. Profit!
Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.