Slashdot Mirror


HP To Sell PCs With Mandrake 9.1

theoddball writes "HP just announced a new PC model (HP Compaq d220) that's available preloaded with Windows or Mandrake 9.1. The machine appears to be targeted to business users, although it's on the lower-end of the scale - specs are here. Mandrake also has a press release announcing the deal, which will grow to include four other HP models. Is this a sign that top tier manufacturers are taking Linux more seriously, or at least seeing a profitable niche?" We commented on MandrakeSoft's status update yesterday.

15 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. Good. Distro variety. by arcanumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is also good news that Large companies see Distros other than Red Hat to be of excellent quality. It have many times seen ignorant IT managers telling me how the only way to go with Linux is RedHat. (which is good, but not the only one)
    Maybe now i can propose the use of my favorite distro and have "managerial" evidence to back it. :)

    --
    Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    1. Re:Good. Distro variety. by MisterFancypants · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Whether this is good or not might depend upon if you're a developer considering writing Linux software. While it might not seem that tough to just support "Linux", the minor differences in all the different distros can really balloon into major QA, tech support and release engineering (as each distro tends to have different preferred package handling systems) headaches.

      I think this hurts Linux as an application target more than most people realize, and I hope one of the many announced standardization efforts actually produces something other than talk and press releases soon.

  2. Re:this.... by geekd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This news is about desktops

    Previous HP linux computers were servers.

  3. Retail!!! by PaulK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looking to find out what retailers would be selling this, I did follow their product link.

    It's not listed yet, but that's no surprise.

    This is probably the ONLY way that people are going to buy this for their homes; a side by side comparison of an MS machine and a (GNU/)Linux machine.

    The retail setting is absoluetely imperative. Buying a preloaded sysem online is well and good, but most people will stick to the devil they know, (MS).

    Now, people will have the whole "touchy, feely," experience.

  4. Sure it is. by EdgeShadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's newsworthy because Mandrake only just recently climbed out of bankruptcy. The fact that a major computer manufacturer has decided to preload Mandrake on one of their business-line models as an alternative to Windows suggests that the company's future might be brighter than many expected.

  5. Re:this.... by mickwd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe it's news because Mandrake is seen as more of a desktop distro than RedHat (though it also forms a very capable server), and it shows that one of the biggest PC suppliers now thinks Linux is ready for the desktop.

    It's also great news for Mandrake, and about time. Well done, Drakes.

  6. Time to make a difference by mcp33p4n75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a great move for promoting linux. Hopefully it'll lead to OS choice where it really matters: laptops. Nobody should have to pay the windows tax ever again! Even better, be able to buy laptop computers without an OS installed and let the consumer get the ultimate choice.

  7. Re:Someone call Bill by RedCard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems like this little insignifcant OS is making inroads despite what Bill thinks. Once products like OpenOffice become more mature the game is over and real desktop penetration, coporate side at least, will happen.

    Yes, it will, and eventually there is a real chance that linux will supplant Windows as the OS of choice for business...BUT... by the time that happens, MS will most likely have tied a great deal of digital rights restrictions technology into windows.

    The upshot? One day, most 'new' media will only be playable on windows, and hence MS will control the consumer market.

    It may be that this is exactly what they are planning for. They may have recognized that they're slowly losing corporate mindshare, and are now grasping at straws in that arena. Look at the suspicious influx of money that they gave to SCO, look at their new corporate licensing policies (subscription model) - are these desperation moves?

    Of course, this is all just opinion and conjecture. Don't mind me.

  8. Re:ipaqs by MerryGoByeBye · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They won't until they figure out a way to not wipe out part of the memory whenever you switch systems in a dual-boot configuration. The iPaq actually has a pretty poor flash-management controller, from what I understand. (Not that CE cares. Hell, it doesn't even know when you install a different boot-loader.)

  9. For about 5 minutes.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then Microsoft puts its foot down and it's replaced with XP.

    No major vendor seems keen to only sell Linux desktop boxes, so the Linux option won't happen until competition law smacks Microsoft on the hand.

    It's only if and when Linux takes the lead over Windows on the desktop that you will see vendors confident to ditch Microsoft.

    Competition is being offered a choice, Microsoft can cry all they like about recent governments coming up with Open Source legislation that only stipulates the use of Open Source, it's them who started all this silly anti-competitive rubbish and vendor lock-in in the first place.

    Dell Flirted with Linux desktop machines and promptly withdrew them. Microsoft needs to stop bullying the OEMs.

  10. Re:Hopefully by Aadain2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    say, edit video
    Linux may lack the video editing tools that are present in the Windows world, but there are projects out there working on them. I personally use Kino for the small jobs I have, and it does the job.
    create artwork
    Two words: The Gimp. Very powerful. Very supported. And free. There are many other programs out there, but The Gimp is the most known. Some compare it to Photoshop.
    manage source code
    This is where Linux shines! It was created by hackers, for hackers, and as such has a great history with development and development tools. I'm constantly suprised that more people don't develope for Linux since it comes with every kind of development tool most will ever need. CVS, IDEs, compilers, linkers, debuggers... Linux has it all and for free!
    create product to send out to clients
    That depends on the product. Where I work, the Windows boxes are nothing more than a way to use the Exchange Server (which the open source world really needs to come up with a replacement for) and maybe a few office documents. The real work is done on Linux and Unix boxes. Everyone here who is part of the core revenue stream works entirely on Linux. It's more secure, free, and easier to manage when you have thousands of servers. So, as far as producing a product to sell, Linux is definately ready, and has been for a while.

    Maybe it's time you actually try doing something real on Linux. I'd think you'd be suprised by how well it works.
    --
    Space for rent, inquire within
  11. Let's hope this saves Mandrake by wukie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you just want to play with Linux, Mandrake should be your only choice.

    If you need to test or develop on Linux, Mandrake will have you up and running in less than an hour.

    If you need a SERIOUS Linux box, Mandrake can be customized to suit aswell, but here it has few advantages over other distributions time wise. Although you get to work in reverse to say Debian.

    I personally can not recommend it over say Suse or Debian for a life-or-death server, but for everyone else, it's just plain awesome. Give it time and Mandrake will give us a brilliant server installation as well.

    Simply put, Mandrake ROX, and all the best to them.

  12. Re:I hope you're joking by toddestan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your kidding, right?

    I installed Mandrake 9.0, and I think I had to reboot it once. Longest part was the actual copying of data. Once it started up and booted into KDE, like magic my sound, video, network, modem, etc. just worked. Just about every program I need already installed and ready to go. Just add Opera and Seti@Home. Time spent 60 minutes max.

    Windows 2000: Install it. Takes like 45-60 minutes. And I am presented with a 640x480 screen with 16 colors, no sound, no network. Couple of hours later, countless reboots. Drivers in. Now Windows update. Many 100's of MB later, and dozens of reboots later, that's done. Now install programs. Several hours later that's done. Also throw in a couple of hours to install video codecs, and getting all the different ones to work with each other without conflict and crashes (UGH!) Time spent: 1 day atleast.

    Linux is lightyears ahead of Windows in the install the OS department. I will admit though, installing programs in Windows is easy, so easy that they install all by themselves at times! (heh). Installing software in Linux is tedious and confusing at times.

    What I find most amazing is Knoppix. Throw a CD in the drive, reboot the computer, and in 5 minutes I'm sitting in front of a fully functional Linux desktop with all my sound/video/network all working, OpenOffice, Mozilla, and countless applications already installed and ready to go - and it's all running off the CD and ramdisk! Utterly amazing.

  13. Re:Not yet on the store by opkool · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mmmm, let's see:
    $ date
    Wed Jul 2 23:39:11 EDT 2003

    And in the Press release says:
    "..., available beginning July 7, ..."

    So far, nothing wrong. IF they are not available on the 7th, then we can all scream and yell in dispair.

    But not just yet.

    Peace.

  14. Re:Gimme notebooks first ! (RE: ipaqs) by majorflaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linux preloaded *anything* could make a dramatic difference. The ability to buy a PC designed for your favorite distro (meaning no compatibility issues, of course), and have it work right out of the box can have a big impact on the O/S and software business. How many people do you know who are quite capable of running Linux but gave up due to their inability to install succesfully. How many distros have you given up on out of frustration with the installation process. Once the install is included with the hardware, we may just see some real competition.