Slashdot Mirror


Which Organizations Have Standardized on Mozilla?

andy brunetto asks: " We are investigating email clients to deploy as our "standard" at the college where I work. I'm trying to find out who is using Mozilla for their email. When I say "who" I mean organizationally, as I realize 99% of us geeks already use it. What organizations out there are rolling out Mozilla as their standard web and/or email client, and why? Yes, we are considering using Thunderbird, once it is final. Thanks!" Hopefully this will make companies realize that the Internet isn't comprised of just IE users.

18 of 833 comments (clear)

  1. Well, mine is by blitzoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    My organization is entirely devoted to using mozilla and mozilla based products.

    And yes, I AM looking to expand our current one man workforce.

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
  2. Sun does by rwoodsco · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sun Microsystems is transitioning to use Netscape 7, which is close enough to Mozilla...

  3. Half.. by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 5, Informative

    of our large R&D development community is using Netscape, mostly because these people are using mostly Solaris or some are using Red Hat (7.3/8/9).

    The other half is ALL IE, Outlook, Exchange.

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
  4. 99% of geeks? by slagdogg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, but the real geeks use Mutt ... graphical email clients are for geek posers ;)

    --
    (Score:-1, Wrong)
    1. Re:99% of geeks? by joe_bruin · · Score: 5, Funny

      bloatware. my company standardized on "more /var/spool/mail/$USER" for reading mail. sending mail is currently unsupported.

      on systems i administer, mutt is symlinked to "more".
      pine is a shellscript that:
      1) generates an alert log.
      2) reduces the user's disk quota by 10mb
      3) runs "more"

      more. what more could you want?

    2. Re:99% of geeks? by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're just a little too BOFH for my taste. We allow sending mail at my company. We have a script that calls "telnet smtp.company.com" and gave everyone a copy of RFC821.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  5. I must be one of the 1% by gilesjuk · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use KMail, it's quite a good mailer IMHO.

  6. One Suggestion by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 5, Informative

    We rolled out IE5.01 using the IEAK (Internet Explorer Administration Kit). It would be a great thing if one could customize Mozilla in straight-foward manner for corporate deployments.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:One Suggestion by slagdogg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mozilla is incredibly customizable, and you don't need to jump through administrative hoops (IEAK) to customize it. I "Snoopified" my menu bar in a few short minutes of hacking ... so my "Fizile" menu now says "Bizounce" instead of "Exit" ... what, I never said the customization was useful.

      Check this URL for a nice tutorial on hacking Mozilla / Phoenix / Firebird.

      --
      (Score:-1, Wrong)
  7. Columbia University by Abel+Wingnut · · Score: 5, Informative

    All public workstations at Columbia University have Mozilla as their default browser.

  8. Not many.... by mblase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the corporate environments where I've been working, Microsoft servers, browsers and email remain the status quo.

    As a web developer, I use Mozilla because it's stricter about standards, and pages that render well in Moz almost always look the same in IE, while the reverse isn't true. One coworker gives me a (humorous) hard time about my refusal to use Microsoft FrontPage or IE when our company is unquestionably "a Microsoft shop".

    Seems like there's no businesses -- certainly not incorporated ones -- want to hire experts in free software like Linux, Apache, PostgreSQL and Mozilla when 2kServer, IIS, SQL Server and IE are what all the other big companies are using first. Mozilla's got an uphill battle, and it knows it.

  9. Purdue by phaedo00 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Purdue used Netscape 7 as the standard browser and mail client on over 3000 lab machines.

  10. Standard email client sucks by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why standardize? As a corporate user, I would hate to have to use a mail reader that is not my favorite. More to the point, I can think of several features that mozilla mail should have before I would recommend it to everybody at my company:
    • Message redirection - Forward a message to another person so that it looks like it came from the orgininal person. Useful for functional addresses common in corporate settings. For example a message was sent to webmaster@ when it should have been sent to support@
    • Disable new mail sound through filters - Corporate users often get lots of mail that they don't actually need to read. Mozilla filters are pretty good. You can sort this mail to another folder and mark it as read. Unfortunately, you can't the new mail sound still goes off when this happens.
    • Change SMTP servers easily - Laptop users are often frustrated with mozilla because there is no easy way to switch between predefined smtp servers when they are between home and work.
    • Change the reply-to on an outgoing message without creating a new account - In mozilla you have to create an account for every email address from which you want to send mail. Creating an account means that you have a new set of mailboxes over on the side of your screen. For corporations that use functional addressing, and have each person with multiple functions, users won't be happy with all the accounts they need to create.
  11. Everyone generalizes from one example... by slashbofh · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Everybody generalizes from one example. At least, I do."
    -Steven Brust

  12. Investigating? by Arandir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We are investigating email clients to deploy as our "standard" at the college where I work. I'm trying to find out who is using Mozilla for their email.

    Do you know why IExploder and Outlurk have %95+ market share? It's not because Microsoft is a monopoly, or because they are better products, or because Bill Gates is a member of the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderbergers. It's because of the herd instinct. People want to use the same software that other people in their group use. Corporations use IE/Ol because other corporations do. Geeks use Linux because other geeks do. There are rare exceptions, but by and large human beings rival cattle in their ability to be molded by the opinion of their peers.

    I get the impression from your question that you're seeking to follow the herd. If you were one of the rare exceptions then you wouldn't care what other companies are using, and just deploy Mozilla. But since you're asking, it seems to me that either you or someone above you needs the assurance that using Mozilla in an organization isn't new, innovative or radical.

    You're not asking about problems others have uncovered while deploying Mozilla in an organization. That's not your concern at all. Instead you merely want to know who is using it. If you want to be a individual unswayed by the unthinking opinion of your peers, then just go deploy Mozilla. But if you just want to make sure your head isn't sticking above the level of the herd too far, then stick with the Microsoft products that all the other organizations are using.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  13. Re: Until Mozilla Crash Bugs are closed... by Colin+Walsh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to be a smart ass (well, sorta), but what about IE? IE is at least as "unstable" as you report Mozilla to be. In my case, I've found that IE crashes far more than Mozilla does, yet I use Mozilla more than IE. I don't think that this is a criteria that many will be using to judge browsers, as both are relatively stable.

    Seriously though, how many open crash bugs are left? It seems that the one you point out is somewhat complicated to duplicate, involves Mozilla interacting with Java (something that seems to cause most browsers some consternation), and is not an issue for 99% of the web-browsing public.

    Not that this has anything to do with Mozilla Mail in the least. A comparison between Outlook and Mozilla Mail or Thunderbird might be a little more on topic. It seems to me that all three are, like their browser counterparts, fairly stable, and offer a fair to decent email experience.

    I find that a big draw for Outlook would be it's well designed UI (seriously, it's about the only thing it's good for! :) and the lock-in you get with MS Exchange, but the huge drawback being the fact that it is so easily comprimised by viruses and worms and whatnot.

    Sadly most people seem to be insanely ignorant of this point, and just keep chugging along, happily flooding the internet with Klez, Bugbear, and Sobig. :(

    I think that the great feature that could attract people to the Mozilla team's offerings is the built-in Bayesian spam filter! Much like pop-up blocking, and, to a lesser extent, tabbed browsing, this is the kind of feature you can mention to somebody, and they go "Oh, hey... that's pretty cool!" It's definitely something that people need, given how much spam is out there, but if people don't know about it, then they will content to wallow in mediocrity.

    -Colin

  14. Re:99% of Geeks?? by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are the stats for the people that click on my sig link from slashdot.

    46% Netscape Navigator 5
    34% Internet Explorer 6
    7% Internet Explorer 5
    6% Opera 7
    2% Konqueror 3
    1% Opera 6
    1% Safari
    < 1% Netscape Navigator 4
    < 1% Konqueror 2
    < 1% Internet Explorer 4
    < 1% Netscape Navigator 3
    < 1% Opera 5

  15. Re: Until Mozilla Crash Bugs are closed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    IE is so much easier in every way.

    Insert the following LINE into an html file and open it in IE:
    <input type text>

    I have IE 6.0.2600.0000, and this single line will crash IE producing the MS "talkback" dialog. I don't have to even load a java class file to produce the same type of behaviour. So obviously IE is superior!!!!

    LOL