Slashdot Mirror


Protecting Cities from Hijacked Planes

Kong99 writes "A group at UC-Berkeley has proposed Soft Walls to stop hijacked planes from entering a protected airspace. Interesting read especially since they claim it is 'hack' proof."

4 of 971 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sounds dangerous to me by blibbleblobble · · Score: 5, Informative

    "What if the only way to avoid a mid-air collision is to bank into one of these "soft walls"?"

    This is why pilots don't like the idea.

    What if I setup my own NDB/DME and get it to transmit an identifier saying "new york". Then put it at the end of a runway...

  2. Re:Emp by Laur · · Score: 5, Informative
    An EMP would disable all electronics, and radios, transponders, etc, but the hydraulic controls for the rudder/etc would still function.

    Nope, sorry. In a fly-by-wire plane there are no mechanical links to the control surfaces. If the flight control computer completely dies, you have absolutely no control over the plane.

    --
    When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
  3. Re:bulkhead without a door by DarkMan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, that's already covered by the current policies.

    As it stands, (and this is pre attack on two towers) the door is ment to be locked. If anyone is held hostage, they are expendable until, and unless, the plane is safely landed.

    That stands.

    However, note that the pilots are in communication with air traffic control. The ability to communicate is powerful, but it also works to help the pilots. Put them on to an anti-terrorist specialist (as is, and has been, in the procedure for several years), and book an appointment with a counseller for the pilots.

    The point of the 'no door' is to refuse the pilots options that will cause more harm. It's harsh, but you're dealing with people who are prepared to kill.

  4. Re:hack' proof by marc_gerges · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, there are. The whole range of Airbus planes (except for the A300/A310 series) are as fly-by-wire as can be. Joysticks in the cockpit, no linkage between the pilot and the wings.

    These planes do not request from their pilots to manipulate the moving surfaces in such a way as to obtain the desired attitude of the plane, they just need input as to what the attitude should be and then move the plane like that. Rather like a computer game, really.

    The most visible advantage of this is that the pilot cannot 'stall' the airplane. The airplane will not put itself in a situation where it would stop flying. One simply cannot 'pull up' or deccelerate so much that the airplane would crash. Quite amazing technology, an entirely not Microsoft powered. ;-)