Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Menu Shadows in GTK2

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the why-the-heck-not dept.

unmadindu noted that there is a now a gtk shadow patch which does what it says for GTK2 applications. You can see a screenshot, or another or yet another. And if you're lazy, here are some RPMs with the patch. One more piece of eye candy to brighten up your weekend.

9 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. phooey :-/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    second post

  2. I hear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ...that the Americans have begun secretly trying and executing prisoners in their Cuban concentration camp. Anyone know any more about that?

    1. Re:I hear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      But do these executions have shadows?

    2. Re:I hear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      We'll laugh as well for yours

    3. Re:I hear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Sounds good, except I think we should skip the trial part.

  3. Fuckit, GNAA wins even if it isn't a FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I've been watching slashdot all day today and each time I see a warning for the new article coming up I get distracted and not get a FP.

    Oh well.

    GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is looking for new members. To apply, please join #GNAA (official GNAA IRC Channel) on EFNET.

    Thank you

  4. I know this is totally offtopic..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    But is there any way of making gtk+2 look like gtk+1's default theme? Everyone seems more interested in making really fancy themes. But I rather like gtk+1's old grey theme, whereas gtk+2's default is vomit-inducing.

    Thankyou.

  5. omg???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Slashdot has been hacked!!!!!!!!!

  6. Re:I'm not so sure... by dizco · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Once the interface is as refined as, say, that of OS X, we can concentrate on the eye-candy.

    Who is this "we" you speak of?