Massachusetts Probing Microsoft Settlement Gripes
tassii writes "In this article from Reuters, Massachusetts' DA's office told the judge in the Microsoft Anti-trust trial that it was looking into Microsoft settlement complaints. Among complaints being examined by Massachusetts was whether Microsoft had violated portions of the settlement prohibiting pacts requiring exclusive support of Microsoft software. Massachusetts was also examining whether the company had properly offered communications protocols allowing non-Microsoft software to work well with Windows." An Associated Press article covers the same story; the non-Microsoft software mentioned in both stories is Linux, but it's not clear which company's promotion of Linux is drawing the attention.
You mean there is actually someone out there trying to inforce the MS penalties?!?!?!?! I thought everyone knew they were all just a big joke and it was back to business as usually for Microsoft.
Space for rent, inquire within
"whether the company had properly offered communications protocols allowing non-Microsoft software to work well with Windows"
Jeez, give 'em a break they're still trying to make Microsoft software to work well with Windows.
Microsoft promised to change it's brandname to Mikrosoft provided Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled in their favor.
An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
Now it turns out that they have yet to have the slap on the wrist yet.
They're also in violation of their restraining order against me, they're not supposed to come within 100 yards the judge said. But they're righ here, on my computer. GET AWAY! GET AWAY!
I don't think Microsoft sucks. I just don't trust the company or agree with a lot of their practices.
Oh wait...
" If you or your business have a complaint about Microsoft's business behavior or practices, please ......"
Switch to Linux.....
...thereby replacing donotcall.gov as the hottest new website around.
> If they are charging so little to OEMs but so much to consumers, they could probably drop the consumer price down to $50 for XP Pro and find the piracy rate dropping! Who here wouldn't buy a legal copy of XP Pro for $50? And wouldn't you not mind the bugs as much, concidering how much you had payed for it?
The market value of an operating system these days is $0.00 plus the bandwidth of a big download. A $50 OS is overpriced by approximately $50.
Or maybe by more than $50, since Microsoft appears willing to pay governments to use their OS whenever another option is getting serious consideration.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
-- Don't Tase me, bro!
but it's not clear which company's promotion of Linux is drawing the attention
Isn't RMS based in or near MIT?