The New Yorker on Business Process Patents
caledon writes "The New Yorker has a clear, concise, nontechnical essay by its finance columnist James Surowiecki criticizing business process patents: Patent Bending.
'Although we have always had a vibrant patent system, we've managed to strike a balance between the need to encourage innovation and the need to foster competition. As Benjamin Day, Henry Ford, and Sam Walton might attest, American corporations have thrived on innovative ideas and new business methods, without owning them, for two centuries. In the past decade, the balance has been upset.' Makes the argument persuasively."
First post you greedy Microsoft loving capatilist GNU/hippies. SCO RIAA MPAA SCO RIAA MPAA SCO RIAA MPAA SCO RIAA MPAA SCO RIAA MPAA SCO RIAA MPAA
What would GOATSE say? Oh, first post!
lol
lol goatse
sing it to yourself a few times
Then again I suspect "mao che minh" IS the goatse guy given that only an anus-spreading fag would actually pay Slashdot money and spend all that karma whoring and tacoknobsucking.
Thank god it's a non technical article, since you're posting it to Slashdot.
How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
ok