Worlds Largest Telescope?

AndersBrownworth writes "With a unique take on "Distributed Computing", the PhotonStar Project aims to search for laser transmissions from extra terrestrial life by harnessing amateur astronomers who have an optical telescope with a laser detector, a GPS and a computer with a net connection. I think it would be interesting to get a large number of computer controlled optical telescopes together that have GPS and CCD capabilities and build the world's largest optical telescope. The concept wouldn't be much different from New Mexico's VLA Radio Telescope. Given the falling prices of computer controlled optical telescopes, a project like this might not be far off."

Comments

Yes, it WOULD be different

[wowbagger]

quoth the submitter:

The concept wouldn't be much different from New Mexico's VLA Radio Telescope.

Actually, it would be. The VLA works because all the signals are brought together and correlated - they are carefully time synced (to the nanosecond) and then combined.

The same trick in the optical domain is called interferometry, and requires that the actual LIGHT from each 'scope be brought together - you need not only the brightness (which a CCD would record), but the phase and polarization of the signal (which a CCD won't record).

So you cannot use an array of 'scopes world-wide to create a virtual array.

What you can do, and what optical SETI is all about, is to have each scope looking at a different star (or star field) at each time.

In a way, comparing the two is like comparing a 64-way NUMA cluster to a Beowulf cluster - one will work well with one big program of many threads sharing data (NUMA/interferometry), and one will work well with many small independent programs (Beowulf/optical SETI).

Re:Yes, it WOULD be different

[Ole Marggraf]

You should also mention ESO's VLTI here, the Very Large Telescope Interferometer at Mt. Paranal, which is just taking its first shots...

Don't forget about the Square Kilometer Array

[nomel]

in Australia.

Site are here, here, and here.

Some technical details are here.

From the later,
The antenna has "...a proposed collecting area at low frequencies (150 MHz to 1.5 GHz) of roughly 1 km2 (or 106 m2) - the equivalent of more than one hundred dishes of 100 m diameter. In contrast, the largest and most sensitive existing array has a physical area approximately one hundred times smaller than this."

That's pretty big. :)

Re:1 foot accuracy of lat-long+altitude required.

[spuke4000]

I'm really not an expert on this, but as I understand it getting *very* accurate lat/long/alt measurements with a GPS is just a matter of waiting. Each measurement is out +/- 10 meters (approx.), but if you average a large number of these measurements you can get a very precise position. This takes several weeks, but it shouldn't be a problem in this case.

Again, I could just be talking out of my ass here, so if anyone has more experience feel free to correct me.

Um. How about this probability equation

[A55M0NKEY]

P( Amateur Astronomer ) * P( Has Optical Telescope ) * P( Has Lazer Detector ) * P( Has GPS ) * P( Has Computer With Net Connection ) * P( Has Heard of this Project ) * 6 billion people on planet earth = 4