Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Latest Proposals for C++0x

Posted by michael on from the +++ dept.

CodeDemon writes "It looks like the ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG21 working group has made some headway in reviewing new proposals for the C++ language. The long anticipated upgrade for C++, C++0x, may be just around the corner. Head on over to check out the proposals yourself."

6 of 911 comments (clear)

  1. Whatever. by tomstdenis · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    You nuts can invent C(\+)* while I will stick to plain jane ISO C thank ya very much.

    Seems people keep inventing new languages to solve problems which are already solved in existing languages. Maybe if the two week IT people who are the backbone of these languages of the week spent three seconds and checked for existing solutions [libraries] they wouldn't seek the language of the second.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  2. Re:Great... by AssFace · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    perhaps this explains why I sometimes shit myself when using templates.
    I had always blamed Korean food.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  3. Fake? by nadim · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    This post is clearly a fake as indicated by this google news thread:

    http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=EK8Ea.1338% 24 qd3.1247%40tornadotest1.news.pas.earthlink.net&oe= UTF-8&output=gplain

    Bjarne Stroustrup is deceased and the PDF linked on the story has his name as the author. What gives? Show some respect people?

  4. Re:where does the name come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Or if you had glanced at the site maybe it stands for C++ OXFORD. Fucking moron.

  5. C++0x? PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    What is with the stupid fucking names? Why do you insecure nerds have to place esoteric labels on your goddamn creations huh? This reminds of those egotistical academics who like to communicate (if you can even call it communication) the simplest ideas in the most cryptic, grammatically complex structures they can possibly make. Idiots. How about you fucking dorks stop trying to impress everyone with the latest l337! name that came out of the latest linux user group circle jerk fest and start focusing on SUBSTANCE.

  6. so then what does C++ + ObejctiveC=? by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    so then what does C++ + ObjectiveC=?

    a big mess that still does not compare to Java..

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource