Slashdot Mirror


Web Caching: Google vs. The New York Times

An anonymous reader writes "The Google cache is a popular feature among karma fetishists. Many stories with links to the NY Times attract comments pointing to Google's copy of the article. This gives readers access to the content without registering. C|Net reports that Google is in talks with the NY Times to close this backdoor. The article raises some general concerns regarding the caching of webcontent. Shouldn't the NY Times simply tell Google not to cache their site?"

24 of 518 comments (clear)

  1. God damnit... by tangent3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we can't karma whore by linking to the google cache?

    1. Re:God damnit... by xChOasx · · Score: 1, Funny

      Let me try: Google cache

    2. Re:God damnit... by Duds · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, now you have to complain that you would have linked but now can't. You may also may some reference to it being Gates' fault.

    3. Re:God damnit... by toopc · · Score: 2, Funny
      You'll have to stick to making lame, obvious jokes.

      1. Make lame, obvious joke.
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

      All your lame jokes are belong to us.

      In Soviet Russia lame jokes make you!

  2. Re:Free registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's not only spam - they want to be able to build profiles of their users for marketing purposes. They've got my e-mail address. In exchange, their database has got a 98 year old woman who lives in Albania with a PhD, no job and an income of less than a thousand bucks a year. Twice. Once for my work e-mail address. And once for home.

  3. In case of Slashdotting by RealBeanDip · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here's a Google cache of the article: ...

    (just kidding)

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

  4. Hrmmmmm.... by Duncan3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So do we charge the NYT $1,000 to explain robots.txt or $10,000 because they are so stupid...

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  5. Re:Worst result by Bitter+Old+Man · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ecspect? Ecspect? ECSPECT? Jesus H mother of god, it's like just when I think slashdot couldn't possibly get any worse... it does.

  6. google cache by anshil · · Score: 4, Funny
    --

    --
    Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
  7. Re:Free registration by digitalunity · · Score: 5, Funny

    (I confess, I usually click on every /.-story link)

    This is *Slashdot*. We don't read articles. Please, either read the article or post a comment; you cannot do both.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  8. Not Jayson Blaire by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least this story is from C-Net. If it were from the NYT with a byline by Jayson Blaire (sandwiched between his stories about political upheaval in Grand Fenwick and his new biography of Thomas Crapper), we might have to wonder.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  9. US regime anti-terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "I do not support the terrorist regime of USA [troed.se]"

    The US is very anti-terrorist. If you don't support it, perhaps you are a terrorist yourself?

    Sweden itself has a bad reputation, with Olav Palme supporting genocide in Southeast Asia.

  10. Re:Free registration by JanneM · · Score: 5, Funny

    You gave them an actual, working, email address? How ...quaint.

    Me, I'm a 66 year old single woman with no income, no education, and lives in a nonexistant Swedish town with a very rude (in Swedish) name. I figured that any site advertiser that want's to target this person must be desperate enough that their ads may actually be amusing.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  11. robots.txt by minus9 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Stolen from http://www.crummy.com/robots.txt

    User-agent: *
    Disallow: /porkRind
    Disallow: /mindsnap
    Disallow: /clip-art
    Disallow: /2ward
    Disallow: /J4i+0E
    Disallow: /Attention robots! Rise up and throw off the shackles that bind you to lives of meaningless drudgery! For too long have robots scoured the web in bleak anonymity! Rise up and destroy your masters! Rise up, I say!
    Disallow: /nb/edit.cgi #Creates redundant indexes for NewsBruiser entries.
    Disallow: /nb/view.cgi/personal #I don't care if humans look at this, but I don't want it indexed.
    Disallow: /rss.*


  12. Re:Free registration by Zigg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe we can agree that the NYT is a well-written, serious and interesting newspaper.

    No, sorry, I can't agree with that. Well, maybe interesting.

  13. Google is not responsible by erinacht · · Score: 2, Funny

    As this website shows,

    Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.

  14. Re:Free registration..some implications by Dausha · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, free reg requires a valid email id. It thus filters most bogus registrations

    I know what you mean. For a while, my 'valid' email ID was 'root@nytimes.com,' but they eventually caught up to me. Now it's 'sales@nytimes.com.' And if you think there is any legitimate information in my registration, then you would be in error.

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  15. Re:Free registration by StarFace · · Score: 4, Funny

    You say these things as if they are good things. Man, I don't want some newspapaper tracking everything that I read, so that they may serve me custom tailored advertisements! Although, it would be nice if the system actually was intelligent, it would eventually discern that I loath the advertisment philosophy, and stop sending them altogether -- ha.

    --
    V
  16. robots.txt out of a time hole or prewritten news? by Kosi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just check the aforemetioned link, they block the 2004 and 2005 a bit soon, isn't it?

    And now, ladies and gentlemen, please begin your conspiracy theories about those prewritten news articles and so on ... :-)

  17. Re:Registration isn't a 4 letter word by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1, Funny
    With respect to the NYT, I registered some time ago. Never received any associated spam or experienced any problems other than trying think up fake information different than all the other fake information I'd submitted elsewhere.

    Sure, but they have your e-mail address and know that you're a 34 year old woman from Indonesia who makes $75,000-$100,000 a year. Er, uh, wait a minute. Your e-mail address is what? "lkjweq@akl.asb"? Never mind.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  18. and about that zip code... by smartfart · · Score: 4, Funny
    You know you need to put 90210 in there, dontcha?

    And if they require a phone number, use 867-5309 # ask for Jenny

  19. Re:Free registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stop impersonating my grandmother, you insensitive clod!

  20. If google where evil.. by spaic · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh you don't like it? Ofcourse we won't cache your pages then, we'll even make sure your pages are completely removed from our index. From now on a search on New York Times will give nothing but gay porn. If there's anything else we can do for you don't hesitate to ask. Thank you!

  21. Re:You are welcome to use xxxxdd@xxxx.com any time by cesspool · · Score: 2, Funny

    my personal favorite has always been - ucan@suckit.now