Slashdot Mirror


Orbital Space Plane Problems

FTL writes "NASA's next big step in space (after getting the remaining Shuttles flying again) is the construction of the Orbital Space Plane. It is a small vehicle designed to transport people to and from ISS. Jeffrey Bell takes a close look at OSP in this article and comes to the conclusion that it will result in yet another crippled vehicle. Sounds like what people were saying about the Shuttle's problems back when it was being designed."

7 of 352 comments (clear)

  1. there is a company with an interesting design by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and the prototype is working.

    they used a modified 747, and a special tow line. they then tow the orbiter up to very high altitutes and launch the orbiter.

    the orbiter then ignights its rockets and because it it already high in the atmosphere, it can use half the fuel of bullistic launch.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:there is a company with an interesting design by WhiteBandit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That company is Kelly Space and Technology based in San Bernardino, CA. (Which is right down the street!)

  2. More of the same by ChuckDivine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, NASA still looks screwed up.

    Possibilities we must consider:

    • Space travel is really beyond us.
    • Space travel is beyond current day NASA. Given current management problems, that is looking increasingly likely. The Washington Post now has a special section on the Columbia disaster.

    What should we (the United States in particular and humanity in general) be doing?

    • One thing is support the X Prize. This will provide alternative experience and data to the NASA monopoly. The more attempts we make, the better. The greater the variety, the better.
    • Since NASA is a U.S. government creation, U.S. citizens should write their Congressional representatives, citing articles such as this one by Jeff Bell and the Washington Post section linked to above. It's time for some light and heat to be shed on this agency.
    • Look for investment opportunities if you have the money.
    --
    "Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- B. Franklin
  3. Compact Car by n1nj4k3n · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the article:

    But, sometimes when you're just going for a drive or taking a trip, you don't really need a bus, a moving van, a construction truck, a science lab, or a race car. Sometimes, a simple compact car would make traveling a lot more convenient and less expensive. The same principle applies to spaceflight.

    I wonder if NASA has considered actually bringing some compact car makers as consultants. How would Honda, Mitsubishi, or Toyota would go about tackling these problems? Combine the efficiency of the Civic or the Insight with the existing X-plane aerospace technology of Lockheed Skunkworks and Boeing, and see what happens.

  4. My Required Space Elevator Post by Niles_Stonne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a pet project of mine, but I think it bears commenting on: The space elevator.

    I think it may be a _very_ good option for the nation's space needs.

    More information can be found here:

    Space Elevators: Low Cost Ticket to GEO?

    More on Space Elevators

    Going Up?

    Calling the Space Elevator

    Space Elevator May Become Reality - The Linked Study(PDF) Was fascinating.

    Space Elevator Could Cost Less Than You Thought

    Stepping Closer To The Space Elevator

    --
    Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but copyright will always protect me.
  5. wow.. by njan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..spaceflight has advanced over the last 50 years..

    Apollo missions regularly landed within 2nm of the predicted point

    ..;).. maybe the army/navy should start using those apollo boosters for weapons delivery. :p

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you
  6. Re:The guy who wrote it comes off as a smart ass. by ralphclark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Absolute rubbish. That article is the most well reasoned piece of analysis I've seen on the space business in a long time. His data is pretty strong, and his arguments logical. It all even seems obvious, with hindsight.

    You might not like what Bell says, but there is no point in shooting the messenger. Judging by your infantile remarks, it's clear that you just didn't understand what he was saying. Your response is reminiscent of an infant shouting and stamping his feet.