Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Names Linux its Number Two Risk
Jorkapp writes "Microsoft has officially moved Linux up to the Number 2 Risk to the company (With Economic Environment at No. 1). Bill Gates has taken the threat very seriously, and has identified Linux and non-commercial software as 'out there and very pervasive.' In response, Microsoft has dropped the price of Windows CE and opened the embedded OS to developers. This will not only allow developers to view and modify CE, but also distribute software incorporated to the modified code."
Coincidentally, when I clicked the view comments link, a large advertisment for Linux.com appeared under the article.
Mr. Torvalds, Mr. Cox, Mr. Stallman.
I lay the blame solely on you!
(Good Job, and thanks for everything!)
How nice of Microsoft. That's like someone asking for a steak and being given in-flight peanuts. Maybe a glass of water, too.
It's a start, I guess.
SecondPageMedia - Wha
1. They ignore you
2. They laugh at you
3. They fight you <----- YOU ARE HERE
4. You win
I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
...to the products that Microsoft actually does well at.
If Microsoft would stick to hardware, such as keyboards, mice and joysticks, elements that Linux and the Open Source movement, and Free Software Foundation has no interest in, Microsoft would soon realize that their only competition is Logitech.
-Rusty
You never know...
#1 risk should really be that their software is crap!
oops...
Thats not a risk, its a fact
On one hand, MS is losing sales ... on the other, MS doesn't look like the monopoly that it once was. Maybe this will get some of the DOJ and politcal heat off of MS?
There is no spoon or sig.
I'm quite surprised that Linux isn't #1 on the list of threats. I don't think Microsoft has too much to worry about individual use of Linux, but rather companies switching to Linux to avoid paying the hefty licensing fees. And I don't think lowering the price of CE will help much. As I stated, the threat's with companies getting fed up with licensing.
I don't think opening the source code will help much either. It costs a lot to get the code, you aren't allowed to recompile it, and you're probably bound by a bunch of other restrictions.
If I were Bill Gates, I'd be worried sick about it and I would probably have nightmares about giant penguins chasing me with pitchforks.
/usr/bin/complain >
Or slipped off the stage into the front row.
There goes MS's board of Directors. Next week the interns sit up front.
And the flames rose higher and higher, and a million emails were fired in anger...
Script kiddies and geeks, UN*X gurus and bearded free-software prophets all sharpened their r00tkits and compilers and started beating louder and louder on the war drums...
Gee, I love the smell of FUD in the morning... It smells like... like... Victory! =)
[and all of this is said with tongue firmly in cheek, of course!]
The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
"Dancing Steve" Ballmer has to be on that list somewhere. What's his number?
One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
The CFOs name is John Connors, coincidence, I think not! Time to Terminate boys.
No well run company would get into a situation where they have $40B in the bank.
No, that's just what Ballmer does in his pants everytime an entire city chooses Linux over Microsoft. Hell, if it were my job, I'd be doing that too.
I thought Microsoft's products were more #2 than anything else.
and to know that Microsoft thinks that Linux is more threatening than you by a long shot. How sad.
You are, number six.
Well, mate we know that the economy is in a bind, but if you don't sign up for our new and improved licensing extortion plan it will be mighty difficult to open your DRM protected word documents by January 1, 2007.
ich bin der musikant
mit taschenrechner in der hand
kraftwerk
> MS did not come to have $40 billions in chash for beeing stupid.
Clearly not, or you'd be rolling in it.
During the 2nd episode of the chapelle show, they did a skit to rip up on Kinko's (a copy and office-supply store). They had a line in there to the effect of - "If they give you a Windows disk, tell them we only run Mac. If they give you a Mac disk, tell them we only run windows. IF they give you both, tell them we use linux. And if they give you all three, tell them the computers are down"
I think it's safe to say when Dave Chapelle uses you in one of his skits, you're reaching the forefront of public consciousness.
Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
But you know the migration from Linux to WS2003 probably wasn't a technical
decision. Some VP probably decreed it and the techs had no choice but to
comply.
I would only start worrying if it turns out that the migrations were,
in fact, due to technical decisions.
The Register had a link to the netcraft uptime summary of Colt's
internet facing server that migrated from Linux to WS2003. Since
migrating, the machine hasn't had an uptime of more than 4.45 days.
Just thought someone might find that interesting.
*sigh* back to work...
But the economy is still on the number 1 spot ! ... well, Linux will take care of *that*.