Slashdot Mirror


Hydrogenaudio AAC Listening Test Results

caffeine_monkey writes "Hydrogenaudio's AAC public listening test, previously posted on Slashdot, is now over and the results are in. The test compared five codecs at 128 kbps, including Psytel, Nero, Sorenson Squeeze, QuickTime, and FAAC. The winner? 'QuickTime is a clear winner, performing much better than the competition. Sorenson Squeeze, Psytel AACenc and Nero are tied, with Sorenson slightly higher than the others. Faac is clearly the worst.'"

15 of 306 comments (clear)

  1. For the Audiophiles... by Michael's+a+Jerk! · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have the Ultimate Guide

    --

    I'm not Seth.

    1. Re:For the Audiophiles... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh my god, these audiophiles are sick! Won't someone pleeease think of the audio?!?

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  2. Things I've heard from Audiophiles... by Michael's+a+Jerk! · · Score: 3, Funny

    The following are actual quotes I've read from audiophiles on the net. Enjoy.

    "Pulling harmonics together from a jumbled auditory stream to form a coherent harmonic envelope."

    "Image outlines were sharply focused in space with believable palpability."

    "There was plenty of bass detail to behold."

    "The music flows with gusto and verve. It squeezes instrumental images into incredibly palpable outlines."

    "...more muscle and definition, and a heart that is pure gold."

    "Most preamps when pushed hard change their sonic signature."

    "Harmonic colors were somewhat on the dark side."

    "By using the $450 gold plated RCA stereo jumper cables for all line-level connections, and the newly available $1200 gold plated XYZ speaker wires, we were able to achieve a distinct improvement in highs and the deepest rich bass lows I have ever heard. A massive improvement over ordinary old copper."

    "These cables deliver big time! The sound is surprsingly smooth and spacious, with particularly sweet upper octaves."

    "If you connect a ground to the chassis of your power amplifer and use 4 gauge wire connected to a bucket of salt water with a copper coil in it, your mids and highs will be the sweetest you have ever heard. Works with car audio systems too. Place the bucket in the trunk and reduce speed on corners and when braking, to avoid spillage."

    "Special wooden resonator disks made in Asia from a special tree, only found in one area. Placing these under EACH of your components, at strategic locations will remove 'unwanted resonances', and DRAMATIC improval tonal quality. The difference is astounding. These disks of wood sell for around $100 to $400 EACH (depending on size)." (See the top of this web page!)

    "somewhat fuzzy portrayal of image outlines."

    "Harmonic textures ebbed and flowed with startling dynamic nuances and the sort of liquidity and purity one only comes to associate with world-class audio products."

    "Harmonic textures are painted slightly gray in color."

    "Spatial detail was painted with a fine brush that readily resolved massed voices and the air around individual instruments."

    "Image outlines, however, are more precisely focused within the soundstage and in general the Accordance is capable of sketching out a convincing 3-D acoustic impression."

    "It felt like I had crawled into a warm and inviting sonic womb."

    "Not content with straight S.E.X. (the single-ended experimenter's kit), the Doctor introduces the "69" tapered pipe loudspeaker. Sounds like a recipe for a mind-blowing sonic orgasm."

    "The impression of speed and control was strong."

    "Bass lines were fleshed out with excellent definition."

    "It is less lush sounding than..."

    "...force feeding the listener an earful of detail; more accurately, a barrage of in-your-face zingers that becomes almost an instant irritant."

    "Each tube brand seems to have a unique flavor of its own."

    "Certain busy passages of music get congested."

    "... sounds either euphonic or bright."

    "The Equilibre ($8,475) - nominally a 60-watt stereo amp."

    "It could well explain the sweet sounds that come from using passive preamps straight into the power amplifiers."

    "...with an easy-to-drive impedance magnitude."

    "Rendition of harmonic colors was suave and smooth, with a believable sugar coating."

    "Exposure of low-level detail, even in complex passages, without leaving anything to the imagination."

    "The mids are vivid in spades with wave after wave of honey-coated harmonic bliss."

    "The midbass region is "fun"

    "the upper mids are a bit more laid back than I would like."

    "the low bottom end is not there..."

    --

    I'm not Seth.

    1. Re:Things I've heard from Audiophiles... by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Funny

      [Oh, and by the way, if the cables really make a difference you need to A) get out more, and B) switch to XLR balanced analog or AES/EBU digital connections.]

      What!? You mean that pure silver digital cable I spent $100000 on isn't going to give me straighter ones and rounder zeroes!?

    2. Re:Things I've heard from Audiophiles... by sevensharpnine · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a musician myself, I can tell you that one of the most important aspects of a stereo to me is its ability to be manipulated with my toes. Makes transcribing music much easier.

      --
      "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -Voltaire
    3. Re:Things I've heard from Audiophiles... by vrt3 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "...Place the bucket in the trunk and reduce speed on corners and when braking..."

      Reduce speed when braking? Ingenious.

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
    4. Re:Things I've heard from Audiophiles... by PeteyG · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yah, I'm an audiophile and I like to maniuplate my stereo with my toes too.

      Frees up my hands so I can better appreciate the masturbatory experience that is spending massive amounts of money on only marginal (and imaginary) improvements in sound quality.

      --
      no thanks
    5. Re:Things I've heard from Audiophiles... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Some of it sounds valid.

      About half of the list consisted of using B.S. adjectives to describe things they never were meant to describe. In short, it mostly reads like clips from a wine taster's guide.

      One of my biggest objections to high-end audiophilia is that the subjects more often than not refuse to try double-blind tests concerning the difference between two products.

      They all claim that the difference is so stinking obvious, but if that were so, then they shouldn't be afraid to prove it. Pshych experiments show that even changing the color of a product's box changes people's perception of performance, so I want factors like that removed through a proper double blind test.

      How all this connects to an AAC test, I don't know, but I hope that was properly administered as well.

  3. Re:I hear aac is horrible by 5prite · · Score: 1, Funny

    na... by current slashdot definition, you gotta use png to free you music :)

  4. Because the API for quicktime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Actually by default records it inside a virtual tin-can. Without that, the RIAA would never have agreed to the iTunes software.

  5. Re:It had to happen eventually by lvdrproject · · Score: 0, Funny

    Ahh. You got the obligatory RIAA comment in. Good show, gov'nor! :)

  6. Interesting new way to karma whore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...ask a stupid question, then reply with the obvious answer.

    1. Re:Interesting new way to karma whore... by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mod parent up!

      Mod grandparent up!

      Mod great-grandparent up!

  7. Re:I hear aac is horrible by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is much more fun to cat files to a MIDI device, but you should not use ASCII, you need bytes with the high bit set. Try an XEmacs binary for example.

  8. Re:Real competition absent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No. This would be like testing the quality of four different types of toilet paper and their comfort on your butt. Then someone comes along and asks why a bidet wasn't included in the comparison.

    I challenge anyone to come up with a shittier analogy than this.