Diebold Voting Systems Grossly Insecure
Several well-known security researchers have examined the code for Diebold's voting machines (which we last mentioned two weeks ago) and produced an extensive report (pdf). The NYT has a story on the report, which cuts to the bone: 'Our analysis shows that this voting system is far below even the most minimal security standards applicable in other contexts. We highlight several issues including unauthorized privilege escalation, incorrect use of cryptography, vulnerabilities to network threats, and poor software development processes. For example, common voters, without any insider privileges, can cast unlimited votes without being detected by any mechanisms within the voting terminal.'
I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
Don't tell anyone about the problems, then when it becomes known you have infinite votes, call it a feature.
Also introduce a talking chad to help you vote, and notify you when it looks like you're writing a letter.
At least this way our presidents are not elected by 20% of the population...
(In the end, I agree with you that mandatory voting is dumb - but it is one of our smallest problems)