Slashdot Mirror


Petri Dish Babies, 25 Years Later

bl8n8r writes ""You can't buy a baby in the United States," said Caplan. "... But you can buy the sperm, you can buy the egg and you can rent the uterus." So, what I want to know is if it's cheaper than my current apartment, and if utilities are included :D" See also a good story about IVF in the Mercury News.

32 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Becoming more common every day by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The NY Times also ran an article recently about the topic, that included an interesting statistic: IVF babies now account for 1% of all births in the U.S. I was genuinely surprised that it was that large a portion.

    As the proud papa of IVF twins born last year, I've got to say it's an amazing process. Of course, as the male, that's easier to say. I didn't have to go through 100+ injections and get stuck with a foot-long needle to have eggs extracted, only to then get to go through pregnancy!

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Becoming more common every day by woodsnick · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed, After me neither of my parents were able to have kids but wanted to have more of their own. My sister (now 16) was a GIFT (Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer) baby and my brother (now 11) was In Vitro and actually frozen for a year before he was implanted. Both are now doing great. I know that there are many children out there waiting to be adopted which is another great option for parents that want children, but I do believe that modern infertility are amazing and worth looking into if you really want to have a child of your own and are unable to. Be warned however, the process is not cheap.

  2. interesting.... by inteller · · Score: 5, Funny

    .....you can rent a uterus, but it is illegal most places to rent a vagina.....so I guess that means renting the uterus grants you vagina flyover rights? otherwise how are yo ugoing to get there?

    1. Re:interesting.... by mekkab · · Score: 3, Funny

      If I were a lawyer, I'd work in an "easment" joke here...

      too bad I'm a geek.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  3. This space for rent by HopeUnknown · · Score: 5, Funny
    "...you can rent the uterus."

    Don't waste your time, they are only offering a 9 month lease.

    1. Re:This space for rent by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does it have a view?

    2. Re:This space for rent by Alien+Being · · Score: 4, Funny

      A womb with a view? That's widiculous.

  4. Well... by da3dAlus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So, what I want to know is if it's cheaper than my current apartment"
    That depends if it's a womb with a view.
    BA-DUM-CHA!

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    1. Re:Well... by dildatron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heh. Reminds me of the cows they have at the University of Idaho that have "windows" installed to see their stomachs (article here or google for more info)

      They are quite a sight.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    2. Re:Well... by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > Heh. Reminds me of the cows they have at the University of Idaho that have "windows" installed to see their stomachs (article here or google for more info)

      Wow, talk about case-modding a Gateway PC!

  5. Utilities by Ngeran · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, what I want to know is if it's cheaper than my current apartment, and if utilities are included

    Yep, the utilities are included, but the plumbing tends to leak a lot for the first couple years.

    --
    if( read(this) ) { you = programmer; }
  6. ObWeirdAl by soulsteal · · Score: 3, Funny

    I Think I'm A Clone Now

    Isn't it strange
    Feels like I'm lookin' in the mirror
    What would people say
    If only they knew that I was

    Part of some geneticist's plan (plan-plan-plan)
    Born to be a carbon copy man (man-man-man)
    There in a petri dish late one night
    They took a donor's body cell and fertilized a human egg and so I say

    I think I'm a clone now
    There's always two of me just a-hangin' around
    I think I'm a clone now
    'Cause every chromosome is a hand-me-down.....

  7. This is going to cause trouble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this is going to cause trouble later on. If two people can't get pregnant on their own, there's a reason for it. It's the gene pools way of saying you're not supposed to re-produce. (aka Darwinism)

    By overriding this mechanism in nature you create a child of inferior genetic make up who would no otherwise be by natural process. I think this is going to bite us in the ass in a few generations.

    While I'm sure it's nice for the parents (yay! we had a baby! look at the odds we've overcome!) I think it's unfair to create a child that may have genetic defects / other problems because of their parent's own selfishness.

    1. Re:This is going to cause trouble... by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are plenty of people out there who are perfectly genetically healthy human beings, who through no fault of there own, are unable to reproduce naturally. Some people are adversely affected by chemicals in the environment, making it difficult to conceive a child, others (like some women who have had abortions) are not able to either. There are still others who can't for any multitude of reasons that are not part of the equation of the traditional Darwinian notion of natural selection.

      Now then, maybe these people ought to just adopt, but I don't think they should be prevented from attempting to have their "own" offspring if they are willing to put up the time and money neccesary.

    2. Re:This is going to cause trouble... by TCaM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To an extent the infertility rate is artificially high becuase of the number of women in the last 30 years that have chosen birth control pills and a career over having children at a young and healthy age. Many are later finding that they are unable to have children because they are too old. This kind of infertility is not due to bad genes, rather it is nature shutting off the reproductive cycle because at an advanced age there is likely to be either damage to the existing eggs in a womans body or a lack of proper health to carry a fetus to full term.

    3. Re:This is going to cause trouble... by USPKyle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are plenty of non-genetic causes of infertility. Endometriosis, and prior surgery can play roles in a womans ability to conceive. Neither are necessarily genetic, so your Darwinism theory holds maybe 30% water, leaving a lot of room for 'unexplained infertility'.

      Either way, eggs and sperm used for IUI/IVF undergo testing for genetic defects, so I could argue that babies concieved via either of these methods are more likely lower the rate of birth disorders. Plenty of preliminary tests are run to determine if the fertility problem is genetic. No right minded doctor would allow fertility treatment if a genetic disorder was a possibility.

      Is it selfish to want something that is inherent to all animals in existence? Try turning that primal urge off...

    4. Re:This is going to cause trouble... by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Over the years, evolution has come up with many interesting adaptations for overcoming it's own limitations. In the beginning, there was no nucleus, DNA didn't coil up, and it didn't have a protective coating. All these things evolved to cope with genetic damage and miscopying.

      Now evolution has come up with an even more powerful adaptation for correcting it's own mistakes: human intelligence. Why throw it out?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:This is going to cause trouble... by heli0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If two people can't get pregnant on their own, there's a reason for it."

      Like they had chemotherapy as children to treat cancer and are now sterile? You know Lance Armstrong became sterile after chemo for testicular cancer? Luckily he had sperm stored just in case and now has a son Luke because of IVF.

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  8. Interesting IVF facts by Alton_Brown · · Score: 5, Informative
    More interesting facts...
    • The size of a human egg is approximately 0.15 mm in diameter. That is about the size of the period at the end of this sentence.
    • The size of a human sperm is approximately 0.004 mm in diameter.
    • Infertility affects 6.1 million American women and their partners, about 10% of the reproductive age population.
    • Infertility is a disease of the reproductive system that affects the male or female with almost equal frequency.
    • Fewer than 5% of infertile couples in treatment actually use IVF. IVF is usually the treatment of choice for a woman with blocked, severely damaged, or absent fallopian tubes. IVF is also used to circumvent infertility caused by endometriosis or a male factor. Many programs also use IVF to treat couples with unexplained infertility of long duration who have failed with other infertility treatments.
    • IVF is a method of assisted reproduction in which the man's sperm and the woman's egg (oocyte) are combined in a laboratory dish, where fertilization occurs. The resulting embryo is then transferred to the uterus to develop naturally. Usually, two to four embryos are transferred with each cycle.
    • According to the latest statistics, the success rate for IVF is 29.4% deliveries per egg retrieval. This success rate is similar to the 20% chance that a healthy, reproductively normal couple has of achieving a pregnancy that results in a live born baby in any given month.
    • Women under 35, without male factor, who try IVF, have on average a 25% chance of conceiving and having a baby. Some clinics achieve even better results.
    • Success with IVF increases with the number of cycles attempted up to four cycles.
    • Of the 82% of pregnancies as a result of IVF that result in a live birth, about 63% are singletons, 32% are twins, and 5% are triplets or more.
    • Studies suggest that ICSI and in vitro fertilization are safe technologies. A recent study covered nearly 1,000 children conceived through these methods in five European countries and found that the children, measured from birth to age 5, were as healthy as children conceived naturally. While other studies have found a slightly increased risk of genetic defects and gene-imprinting disorders in children conceived through ART, more research needs to be done to determine the risks and the processes by which this might occur.
    • IVF was successfully used for the first time in the United States in 1981. Since then, more than 114,000 babies in the US have been born as a result of the technique.
    • One cycle of IVF costs an average of $12,400.
      IVF has reduced the number of tubal surgeries by 50%.
  9. Nova's coverage by ajs · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nova recently had a great episode about IVF and other techniques. Some of it was actually kind of scary, like the tech in a fertility clinic who explained why multiple births are so common. His take was that it's all market pressure. If women look at the statistics for a fertility clinic, they will see that some percentage of all IVFs resulted in birth. Well, if you cram 5 viable eggs back in, instead of 2, you *are* more likely to get multiples, but you're also less likely to damage your success record in terms of viable implantations....

  10. IVT et al. by aliens · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They're all great, and I'm happy for those parents who couldn't have children otherwise.

    But, has the number of couples that can't have children gone up? It always worried me. Am I just being paranoid?

    Also these procedures are not cheap! That money could really change an orphan's life...

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  11. Check out Wired by Flamed+to+a+Crisp · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the August issue of Wired magazine, there was quite a disgusting infoporn about how you could sell your body for $46 million. It priced egg cells at $7,000/egg and sperm at $75/donation.

    --
    It's... News for Nerds! Stuff that Matters! La-de-da-de-da-DE-da!
  12. Some of us cling to the older ways by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have sex with women, you insensitive clod!

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  13. Re:Higher rate of birth defects by Kenneth+Stephen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are lots of genetic problems that technology is able to overcome. Do you have vision problems? Surely you arent suggesting that folks with inferior vision shouldnt have been born in the first place, rather than having their vision corrected via glasses and / or medication? Do you suffer from asthma? Today, with the proper medication, there are asthma sufferers who are able to compete in the Olympics. Do you have diabetes (OK - not sure if this is a genetic defect, but the point still stands)? Should people with diabetes be allowed to die in order to "purify" the gene pool?

    Human evolution is a different ballgame. People today are physically larger overall than their medievial ancestors because of better nutrition. They live a lot longer because of better health care and dentistry. They can live in harsh environments thanks to technological solutions like air-conditioners and winter jackets, and shoes. Why do you think the Luddite way is any better? IMHO, the good old days werent really that good - and if people do think so, its only because they tend to forget the numerous small nits from earlier days rather easily.

    --

    There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.

  14. I admit, i'm a sick puppy. by t0qer · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was a kid, sex education was fascinating. So was masturbation. So was my Jr. Scientists microscope.

    Let me put it another way, i've seen my own sperm.

  15. Nature's course is not flamebait by nano-second · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What else is the point of evolution but to propagate the best, healthiest genes. I agree, it would really suck to want a child and not be able to have one.

    However, there are many positive ways to deal with that situation. Adopting within N.America is a long and difficult process, partly because we don't have orphanages full of adoptable children. China, Russia, and some S.American countries do. If you have the means to get invitro fertalization done, then you probably have the means to do international adoption.

    It may not be a popular point of view, but there is no rule out there that says everyone has to or should be able to have a baby if they want to, even though they can't naturally. I think it is unwise to go through all sorts of unnatural steps to have your own child, ignoring what Mother Nature decreed. This is just the point of view of an environmentalist, applied to humans. I think we need to be responsible in our environment.

    I have nothing against people who have been born due to fertility treatments of one sort or anther, but I would be interested in studies tracking those people and seeing if they had higher rates of cancer and other health problems than the general population. And is a child born to an infertile couple more likely to be infertile themselves?

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
  16. Conception terminology by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

    If a baby is conceived by IVF, they're called test tube babies.

    If a baby is conceived after drunken passion, then could it be called a beer bottle baby?

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  17. What's happening? by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Funny


    "Still more Sex.com"
    "Petri Dish Babies, 25 Years Later"

    For crying out loud, what's happening to slashdot??!

    Oh wait...
    "Laptops for warm climates"
    Much better :)

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  18. Re:what about adoption by praksys · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...rather than contributing to the overpopulation problem...

    In countries where this kind of technology gets used most often there is no over-population problem. Most industrialized nations have declining populations, and the world as a whole may well have a declining population quite soon.

    ...and while there's that certain [stupid] ego-stroking factor of having a kid...

    I think it's great that some people are willing to take on the difficult task of raising other people's children, but I also think it is sad when the natural desire to raise one's own children is denigrated as stupid, selfish, or perverse.

  19. mod me down now... by bigbigbison · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Call me crazy, but it seems a lot better to adopt a child than go to all of this trouble. In fact it seems downright selfish that one would rather spend tons of money rather than adopt a child that already exists. It seems so selfish that I might go so far as to argue that perhaps this desire that the child must be mine mine mine might go so far as to make people bad parents due to the fact that they are so slefish thinking of thier own needs and wants and are unable to love a child just becuse it doe snot have their DNA.
    Now before I'm modded as a troll. Tell me, why isn't it selfish? Why is the idea of adoption so repellant that one would rather go through such effort to create a child?

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    1. Re:mod me down now... by bourne · · Score: 4, Informative

      Call me crazy, but it seems a lot better to adopt a child than go to all of this trouble.

      Have you ever looked into the adoption process to see what's involved? From your comment above, I seriously doubt it.

      Let's see... with IVF you're looking at $10-12k for a child (paid for by insurance in a small minority of US states) which has a genetic relation to you, where the odds are very high that pregnancy will result in birth, where you can breastfeed (which has significant advantages over formula, marketing to the contrary), where you get to bond and care for it from day 1. In the other corner, adoption costs $25-$35k and can take two or three years. There is a significant possiblity that that you can be all ready to adopt when the birth mother changes her mind - or that she can change her mind after you've taken the baby, in some states. Or, with foreign babies, you might have to adopt a 6-month old because its home country requires it stay in an orphanage for 6 months before being adopted, meaning that you miss the most important bonding period. And you may or may not know what drugs, alcohol, or smoke the baby was exposed to in utero. And, for all you know, the parents are dumb as a post and ugly as bricks.

      In fact it seems downright selfish that one would rather spend tons of money rather than adopt a child that already exists. It seems so selfish that I might go so far as to argue that perhaps this desire that the child must be mine mine mine might go so far as to make people bad parents due to the fact that they are so slefish thinking of thier own needs and wants and are unable to love a child just becuse it doe snot have their DNA.

      Based on this, I gather that NOT ONLY have you not been involved in one of these decisions, you don't know any parents of IVF children. I know many, and I have never ever met one who was as narcissistic as you describe; most of them quite the opposite.

      Now before I'm modded as a troll.

      You're not a troll, you're just making uninformed suppositions.

      Why is the idea of adoption so repellant that one would rather go through such effort to create a child?

      It isn't repellent. But it has a number of disadvantages relative to IVF, which makes IVF a rational choice for many people. There are a lot of selfish behaviors in the modern world - IVF is not one of them. It involves pain and sacrifice and courage that people who haven't done it can't imagine.

  20. Speaking as a female geek... by hawthorne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    who is currently approximately the size and shape of a very unfit hippo - with sprog #2 due anytime now - I have to say that you probably couldn't pay me enough to go through this for any reason other than the prospect of the kiddo at the end of it - and I have (so called) easy pregnancies.

    Then again, I'm in the lucky position that I can earn enough money via 'normal' channels that the prospect of a few (tens of?) thousands souldn't make me likely to do it - I appreciate that the surrogacy fee is probably a make or break figure for some.