Slashdot Mirror


$50 Aerial Digital Photography from a Balloon

jizmonkey writes "This guy built a balloon to take digital aerial photographs from thousands of feet up. It cost less than $50 altogether, including the image sensor, controller, and balloon. The circuit is surprisingly straightforward: just a hacked Vivitar minicamera, a 555 timer chip driving a relay through a voltage regulator, and a one-meter party balloon like the ones you see at used car dealerships. It just so happens that the entire circuit, strapped to a piece of a pizza box and tied to a really long string, is light enough to be lifted by the balloon. What could low-cost aerial photography be used for? I'm sure some people have some ideas...."

19 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. So... by James+A.+A.+Joyce · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...how long will it be before he gets sued by Barbra Streisand?

  2. Planes... by Romeozulu · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a private pilot, I hope he keeps this thing below 1,000 feet.

  3. Doesn't sound like as much fun... by kzinti · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...as Kite Aerial Photography. Same idea, except you suspend the camera from a kite.

    1. Re:Doesn't sound like as much fun... by heli0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Kites can lift a lot more weight and subsequently people are usign higher quality (SLR) cameras.

      Here is a project camtroller to use a Parrallax Basic Stamp to control a digital camera on a kite.

      More info here: rc-soar

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  4. Two Words by mhesseltine · · Score: 4, Funny

    Naked Sunbathing

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  5. heh by The+Tyro · · Score: 4, Funny

    this criticism from a guy named "larry bagina?"

    Too funny. Only on /.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  6. "Dakota DIGITAL single-use camera," $11??? by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Speaking of gadgets to use in projects like this one...

    In the July 24th Boston Globe, Ritz is advertising something called a "Dakota Digital Single-Use Camera."

    Now, I've seen a "digital single-use cameras" from Kodak which just used film, and the only thing "digital" about them is that when you send them in for processing, they scan the negatives and send you a CD along with the prints.

    But this one SAYS "Delete and Retake Last Shot," which, to me, suggests that it really IS digital. It's $10.99. It says it will take 25 images. No indication of resolution. And no indication of precisely what you do after you have taken the pictures.

    I probably need to get one and crack one open. It sounds like a very interesting device for hacking.

    It will be very annoying if it turns out that $10.99 means that you pay $60.00 up front and get $49.01 back when you bring it in for "processing," though.

    Googling on "Dakota Digital Single-Use Camera" and even "Digital Single-Use Camera" doesn't turn up anything except that phony Kodak film camera...

    1. Re:"Dakota DIGITAL single-use camera," $11??? by heli0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think Walgreens beat them: Walgreen's single-use digital camera

      "it's 'the only single use camera' with a delete button to let them retake shots"

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  7. Ex-prisoners by darnok · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just had a vision of releasing prisoners early, and using this balloon/camera thingy to track their every move. It hovers over them all the time, and feeds pictures back to some central point so their whereabouts can be monitored at all times. They're free to go wherever the rest of us can go, but they have this camera hovering over them all the time until their sentence is up. Think of the savings in jail accomodation!

    Then the fatal flaw hit me: the ex-con goes for a job interview, holding a 1m balloon with a camera suspended below it, on a piece of string, in an office trying to describe how he'd be a great employee.

    The local bad guys' public bar would look like a fairground, full of shiny balloons. "Mum, can we go play in that new inside park?" would be the cry from the kindergarten set.

    Or imagine a typical NBA game. With the number of balloons that would be floating over the players, nobody would be able to watch the game. Hold on - there's no reason the balloons couldn't contain advertising.

    Well, actually that's several fatal flaws, but I still think it has "weird and cool" merits that override the "it's a really, really dumb idea" issues. This idea has a really great application somewhere, but I just can't see it at the moment.

    Gotta get more sleep tonight

  8. Not a free balloon by localroger · · Score: 4, Insightful
    No person may operate an unmanned free balloon

    This is an unmanned tethered balloon. Unless I'm missing an obscure bit of aeronautical jargon here, this regulation doesn't apply. And for good reason I'd gather, since a tethered balloon can be reeled in, but a free balloon (like most weather balloons) goes where it wants once you release it.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:Not a free balloon by sglider · · Score: 5, Informative
      Excellent point. The regulations for a Tethered balloon are:
      (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate a moored balloon or kite- (1) Less than 500 feet from the base of any cloud; (2) More than 500 feet above the surface of the earth; (3) From an area where the ground visibility is less than three miles; or (4) Within five miles of the boundary of any airport. (b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to the operation of a balloon or kite below the top of any structure and within 250 feet of it, if that shielded operation does not obscure any lighting on the structure.
      This regulation is even worse, due to the limitation of 500 feet above ground. Again, thanks to Google and to these guys.
      --
      War isn't about who's right. It's about who's left.
    2. Re:Not a free balloon by whorfin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This was a 1 meter balloon, so isn't affected by these rules.

      These rules, as specified in the link, apply only to a balloon with a diameter of more than 6 feet or a gas capacity of more than 115 cubic feet.

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
  9. Automobile traffic analysis by ErikTheRed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Funny that this story should come up; I was making an exceptionally long commute to a project today (80 miles each way, 40 of which were in heavy traffic) and was thinking about an analysis of traffic patterns - starting with the hypothesis that the density and speed of vehicles in each lane constitutes a form of pressure and the how this is affected by the number of cars entering and exiting at each intersection, and also the addition / subtraction of lanes along the course of the route. I was thinking that this could be accomplished with some custom image recognition software and a medium-resolution video stream from a several cameras a few thousand feet up (I was thinking helicopters, circling aircraft, and even blimps, but all would be much too expensive). I hadn't considered that a balloon might work so well.....

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  10. REAAAAALLLLLY high balloon pics by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative
    Or, for only two or three hundred more, you can get pictures from the edge of space on a balloon. We have gone to over 110k feet and recovered inexpensive film cameras, and have some incredible shots.

    Photos

    or

    High Altitude Balloon Project

  11. Here's some other examples using kites: by Kheldar99 · · Score: 4, Informative

    William Freeman has a good page on his MIT AI lab homepage about doing the same thing except using kites to take pictures. (Btw, check out William T Freemans MIT e-mail address...)
    http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/wtf/kite.html

    And another link to a good site is Charles Benton's site.
    http://www.arch.ced.berkeley.edu/kap/

    Its interesting to note that there are lots of methos for creating unstructured panoramas. Where you have a set of images and the algorithm does its best to determine how to stick the images together to form a panorama. You could imagine a similar algorithm using these images to auotmatically create aerial maps... might make a good paper.

  12. Outside? by matguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, so this involves going outside? Forget that.

    --

    matguy(.com)
  13. AIPTek Pencam and Mustek Mini3 cameras by pm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For a modest increase in budget, you can get a big increase in the quality of the photos. In the really light, fairly cheap, and better quality digtal camera catagory are the AIPTek Pencam 1.3 and Mustek Mini3 cameras. I bought my AIPTek Pencam for about $70 and it takes pretty good digital photos at 1.3MP.

    Both of them are fairly easy to modify as well and there are sites that show in detail how to take them apart and enable other triggering options - such as a 555 or a radio controlled trigger. One example: http://www.rc-cam.com/camman.htm

  14. Re:How did you recover the balloon? by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    we have had 26 or launches, recovered all but the first one. ground distance is anywhere from several miles up to 200 miles. It radios back telemetry through a ham radio link, which gives us a moving map of us and the payload. actual recovery usually is in northern minnesota swamp/forest land, so we have had a couple that have taken a days to recover. the walk is usually never more than a mile, but that can be in some fairly hostile areas.

  15. Re:Impilcations and alternatives... by Zakabog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah and why even buy a camera to take photographs, you can just hire a photographer to take pictures of people doing other things you did once. Sure they might pictures that you don't want but who cares right?

    The reason you would do this is not to get just any pictures from the sky, it's to get YOUR pictures from the sky. Like a picture of your house, or your car, or your neighborhood (all of these with you standing in the picture (or out of it depending on how YOU feel) controlling where the balloon goes to take pictures. Not an archived photo of someone elses. And that's $50 A MONTH, not close to a one time fee of $50. And also these are your pictures to share with the world, I'm pretty sure I can't go around sharing keyhole's earthviewer pictures with all my friends.