Slashdot Mirror


The Biggest and Baddest Backyard Roller Coaster

BoomZilla writes "Following on the heels of previously reported backyard roller coasters (here and here), I'd like to add Jeremy Reid's wondrous beast to the list. This behemoth certainly takes the award for the largest, fastest (and most likely the most expensive) labor of coaster love. Located in Newcastle, Oklahoma, it has an initial drop of 20ft, pulls max positive G's of 3.5 and max negative G's of -0.2. Overall it's a stunning 444 feet in length. Total cost is estimated at $5.5k. Jeremy is, clearly, a man with too much time and money on his hands!"

17 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope he has a lot more time on his hands - to maintain it. Maintaining a rollercoaster is not easy.

    --a Cedar Point employee

    1. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Insightful?

      What does professional rollercoaster maintenance have to do with the fact that an intelligent young man successfully designed, built, and tested his own rollercoaster?

      How about, "Kids, stay out of model rocketry because NASA procedures take lots of time!" Better yet, stay away from all engineering....?

  2. NIfty toy by curtlewis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pretty slick, but you just KNOW some kid is gonna climb his fence, ride the coaster, fuck it up, hurt himself and sue the guy.

    So... $5.5k + $1million lawyers fees + $5 million per kid that parents let run loose unattended.

    1. Re:NIfty toy by toughluck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This to me just says how badly things need to change. Any parent that sues another because

      1. they let their kids run around with no supervision.

      2. does not teach their kids what is safe and what is not.

      3. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY!!! does not and will not take responsibility for their Childs actions and for their own lack of parenting

      should have their lawsuit thrown out of court and then sued by the government and by the person they sued for contributing to the problem of our kids pushing off the blame to anyone else they can.

      And yes for the record I am a father of 3.

    2. Re:NIfty toy by guacamolefoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By Pennsylvania law, you're required to have a fence around your pool. Otherwise, if someone decides to trespass and use your pool, you're responsible if they drown.

      Facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances. If a seven year old trespasses and drowns in your pool and you have no fence or a fence with a gate that doesn't latch, blah, blah, blah, you may be screwed. If the neighbor's college kids come over a trespass in your pool and drown, you'll be fine.

      BTW, it is not a "Pennsylvania law" that I am aware of regarding pools and fences. Many, if not most, municipalities have regulations in their building codes and zoning codes addressing this issue, but not all. That doesn't make it a "Pennsylvania law"; it makes it a local ordinance.

      GF.

    3. Re:NIfty toy by Sabalon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An 8 foot pricacy fence should stop a child too young to know better. If they are old enough to bypass the fence, they are probably old enough to know better.

      Perhaps I'll find some poisinous berries on a bush on government land, let my daughter eat one then sue for them being an attractive nuisance.

    4. Re:NIfty toy by rossifer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The child falls off the deck and breaks his spine and is paralyzed from the waist down for life.

      1) What deck are you referring to? In this discussion, we've got roller coasters, pools, and fences, but your post is the first to mention a deck.

      The child is not at fault, and should not bear the cost of the negligence of others.

      2) Life is not fair. No matter what society says, I am ultimately responsible for my own safety, as is every other person on this planet with agency (i.e. is concious with decision making capacity; infants don't qualify).

      Parents will almost always assume responsibility for the safety of their young children because they love them and want their genes to continue on through more generations. There's nothing stopping them from doing that (I will do that when I have children of my own, probably about three years from now, I'm guessing) but let's not pretend that even younger children don't bear real responsibility for their sometimes stupid actions. To repeat: this parental generosity doesn't remove ultimate responsibility from the individual.

      I'll bet my kids are going to end up in the emergency room more than once and I hope that they gain wisdom from their injuries, but I'm not going to sue the construction company building a house nearby if my kid sneaks into the partly finished house and 1) steps on a nail in a loose board 2) in suprise and pain at the nail penetrating his foot, falls from an unfinished upper floor to the plywood covered floor below, breaking his arm and then proceeds to 3) cut his hand on roughed in ductwork trying to get back out... (it was a very exciting day for my mom, who was convinced that I was never going to make it to adulthood). But there was no thought of suing the construction company. I was foolish and paid the price for my stupidity.

      If a different child pays a higher price for his stupidity than I did, then I'm sorry for his troubles, but this is yet another way in which our modern legal system does not attempt to determine responsibility sanely, but instead seeks to assign blame to anyone but the injured party so that they can be "compensated" for their loss.

      No wonder that the first two ways people expect to get rich in this country are 1) win a big lawsuit or 2) win the lottery. Lawyers are writing the laws which benefit the lawyers (find the deepest pockets in reach and plunder... not easy enough to plunder? "There ought to be a law." "It's for the sake of the children..." "If just one child is saved.") Complete and utter bullshit.

      Sorry about that. Nothing personal, your post just happened to be the straw that broke the camel's back, as it were...

      Regards,
      Ross

  3. Too much time and money on his hands? by vudufixit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm really tired of hearing normative statements like that. If someone has earned that money and/or time to pursue a hobby, no matter how unconventional, it is their absolute right to do so. Before we humans started generating agricultural surpluses above what we could hunt and gather, one person's idle pursuits could impact the ability of a whole community to feed itself. We don't have that situation now, and shouldn't feel the need to criticize anyone's idleness, if they have earned the right to it.

    1. Re:Too much time and money on his hands? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1, Insightful
      ...Before we humans started generating agricultural surpluses above what we could hunt and gather, one person's idle pursuits could impact the ability of a whole community to feed itself. We don't have that situation now...

      I take it by "community" you mean "the neighbourhood in which you live," because it appears as if we are *not* adequately feeding our global community. So, in other words, your statement is complete bullshit, even if I *do* agree with the fact that one's hobby shouldn't be criticised.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  4. Great job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since nobody else has said it,
    "Great job!"

    Of course, all of the early posts either talk about how much time it took, how boring Oklahoma is, how it can be dangerous, etc. People like Jeremy are actually DOING things instead of reading about them and being critical.

    Well done!

  5. Pot-kettle-black by WasterDave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A man with too much time on his hands builds a rollercoater? This is from people who spend all their spare time building kernels for a community developed operating system, pissing around with config files, fighting off RPM dependencies then telling the world how easy it all is?

    Do you not think there's a little, y'know, irony in the whole thing? Maybe "Rolldot. News for people that make rollercoasters. Stuff that matters." runs the occasional story about people making operating systems in their back bedroom.

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    1. Re:Pot-kettle-black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wouldn't have moderated the original post as flamebait.

      This one, however, I would.

      C'mon, it's just a little moderation. Other moderators moderated it differently. No one is hurt, and you got to see a range of opinions on the post (two flamebaits, two insightfuls, and a funny). It hardly supports your sweeping generalizations about Slashdot's population... you just ended up looking silly.

  6. Nobody's riding though. by ndvaughan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not one of the pics (or movies, I believe) has anyone actually IN the car (if you can call that little wooden box a "car") as the coaster is operating. One pic has a view of the top of the first hill, but he could have just climbed up to take it.

    I have a feeling the first day he tested it out, it either :
    A) Caused serious injury, or
    B) Didn't work (couldn't make it up hill or around track)

    Just my suspicion.

    Dallas

  7. Re:Engineering??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You said: I'll be interested when I see a backyard roller-coaster with some actual engineering design work put in to it.

    The post immediately before yours said: Check his resume and you'll see that he has some experience with Roller Coasters: Not only is he a mechanical engineer, but also once woked for Arrow Dynamics, which is one of the foremost Roller Coaster companies in the world.

    Just because the freaking thing isn't over-engineered in steel and concrete to last through Hurricane Andrew, doesn't mean it isn't properly engineered. As someone else said, wood rollercoasters have a distinct look/feel/sound to them that steel cannot hope to match.

    If you're so smart, build one, or shut up. This guy has built a cool thing. What do you have to show for your life?

  8. Re:Fragile? by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wood can easily stand up to the elements for many many years. trees are designed that way, to survive against rain and tornadoes and whatnot

    But a tree is alive and can heal. A wooden roller coaster is not, and cannot.

  9. pressure treated yellow pine by nietsch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Like the article states it is made out of pressure treated yellow pine. Even if it was made out of untreated wood, it'd still be safe in 10 years time, provided he did the engineering right(no places where water can pool on the wood). (He is an engineer, and unlike you probably knows his stuff)
    If wood stays dry, it will not rot, it just stands there. Like trees really.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  10. Re:Time? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Jeremy is, clearly, a man with too much time and money on his hands!

    I am sure that after Jeremy finishes college... he will get a better job than you and by 35 own a hellova(tm) more stuff and have much bigger piles of money than you BECAUSE of this.

    This is the kind of person that already at 22 has more accomplishments not only personal but in the workplace that 90% of the population. a 22 year old with a project manager title and corperate engineering experience already on his resume.

    sorry, but this lad is a better man that most of us here (Yes including me.)

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.