Slashdot Mirror


The Biggest and Baddest Backyard Roller Coaster

BoomZilla writes "Following on the heels of previously reported backyard roller coasters (here and here), I'd like to add Jeremy Reid's wondrous beast to the list. This behemoth certainly takes the award for the largest, fastest (and most likely the most expensive) labor of coaster love. Located in Newcastle, Oklahoma, it has an initial drop of 20ft, pulls max positive G's of 3.5 and max negative G's of -0.2. Overall it's a stunning 444 feet in length. Total cost is estimated at $5.5k. Jeremy is, clearly, a man with too much time and money on his hands!"

26 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since this was a Slashdot article, I figured it must have been about a guy who built a 9-monitor roller coaster simulator running across 3 PC's.

  2. Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope he has a lot more time on his hands - to maintain it. Maintaining a rollercoaster is not easy.

    --a Cedar Point employee

    1. Re:Dangerous by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 4, Informative

      I doubt the use is heavy enough for maintainance to be a big issue.

      Weather's a big issue. Even pressure-treated lumber wears in an annoyingly short time. The rails will also corrode.

      It's a great achievement, but if its time before a major overhaul is needed is over 10 years, I'll be impressed - and this took years to build.

      As long as he puts in the time, kudos to him.

    2. Re:Dangerous by Jacer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Last summer when I was at Cedar Point I was stranded on the top hill of a roller coaster for about two hours before being escorted down the stairs to the side of the first hill. The engine towing us up the first hill was siezed. I was really pissed off because I drove 1,200 miles for the roller coasters and spent a good chunk of my second of three days doing nothing, I mean, for the two hours, I could have almost made it completely throught the line of the Millenium Force!

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  3. NIfty toy by curtlewis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pretty slick, but you just KNOW some kid is gonna climb his fence, ride the coaster, fuck it up, hurt himself and sue the guy.

    So... $5.5k + $1million lawyers fees + $5 million per kid that parents let run loose unattended.

    1. Re:NIfty toy by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Pretty slick, but you just KNOW some kid is gonna climb his fence, ride the coaster, fuck it up, hurt himself and sue the guy."

      Wasn't it Han Solo who said "better you than me"? Man, it's like that movie applies to everything!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:NIfty toy by ashkar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, in at least several states in the U.S. you are liable even if the injured party is "uninvited".

      Sometimes my pride in being American tastes like shit.

    3. Re:NIfty toy by guacamolefoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Two words:

      Attractive nuisance. Sorry, user 633962, the courts disagree with your view. Here's a brief definition of the doctrine:

      http://insurance.cch.com/rupps/attractive-nuisan ce -doctrine.htm

      Clearly, a parent who fails to supervise would be likely be brought in as a codefendant, but that's not to say that a person or entity that maintains an attractive nuisance is without responsibility for the harms that can befall children (who do not know better).

      Here's the problem:
      The tort system is used to try to compensate for damages. A very young child just doesn't know better, and the law has developed in a way that basically says "society should hold someone other than the child responsible for making the world safe for children because the child (1) doesn't know and better and (2) leaving the child exposed to danger is harmful. Better to look to a way to prevent these injuries from happening. Someone maintaining an attractive nuisance presumably has the benefits of it, so it is only fair that they should bear the costs of it as well.

      Your issue is not necessarily with attractive nuisance, but with a separate tortfeasor, namely the negligent parent. While I do not disagree with you, you must remember that the harmed party is the child and limiting the child (who, remember, does not know better because he/she is very young) from recovering. Saying "blame te parents" doesn't screw the parents, it screws the kid more often than not, since it limits the ability of the totally without blame child from recovering for his injuries from either (1) the negligent parent (who may, and usually is, insolvent) or (2) the maintainer of an inherently dangerous object.

      Any parent that sues another because [...]
      should have their lawsuit thrown out of court


      It is not the parent's lawsuit -- it is the child's lawsuit. And yes, as I mentioned above, it is likely that the negligent parent would be brought into the suit as a codefendant by the maintainer of the attractive nuisance. Unfortunately, the parent is all-too-often insolvent. That leaves us with an extremely young child with poor judgment in an uncompensable situation just because someone likes to maintain a rollercoaster in his yard (something with low social utility). Sorry, but the courts do not agree with you.

      GF.

    4. Re:NIfty toy by Plix · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's true in New York including if the person is trespassing (I realize that you were implying thus, but I figured I'd just state it explicitly). You can also be prosecuted for what's called an "attractive nuisance" (which a backyard rollercoaster would probably qualify for).

    5. Re:NIfty toy by lewp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right, but what's your excuse?

      --
      Game... blouses.
  4. In case of Slashdotting by dicepackage · · Score: 4, Informative

    Technical Info: Style: Out and Back Height: 17 feet First Drop: 20 feet Top Speed: 20 mph Track Length: 444 feet Max Positive G's: 3.5 Max Negative G's: -0.2 Material: Pressure Treated Southern Yellow Pine Number of Drops: 4 Lift hill angle: 26.6 degrees 1st Drop: 54 degrees 2nd Drop: 43 degrees Curve banking: 50 degrees Duration: About 1 minute Cart: Single Car, Wood and Steel Construction Capacity: Single Rider Chain Lift: 1HP Motor, 3/4" Pitch Roller Chain/Sprockets Overall: 9,500 lbs (4.75 Tons) Lumber 7,000 Screws/Nails 2,900 board feet of lumber Investment: $5.5k Started Construction: September 1997

  5. loops. by stagl · · Score: 5, Funny

    what? no loops? ;) (i'm hoping some crazy guy will take this challenge so i can see another article entitled "bigger badder roller coster")

    --

    R.I.P.
  6. An American pastime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, do slightly crazy folks in other countries build homemade roller coasters as well, or have the slightly crazy Americans got a monopoly on this?

  7. Re:Fragile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    old wood means nothing, as long as its not rotten, wood can easily stand up to the elements for many many years. trees are designed that way, to survive against rain and tornadoes and whatnot. altho i doubt a high quality wood was used in the production, i also doubt that its 'fragile' i mean its a roller coaster for cmndrtaco's sake. fragile is not a term to be used lightly.

    consolevision roxors

  8. Biggest Coaster Ever... by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone read the title and think that AOL switched from CD-ROMs to Laserdiscs? :)

    1. Re:Biggest Coaster Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apparently you did... but no one else.

  9. Advertisement.. by ewhenn · · Score: 5, Funny

    bag of popcorn: 3$
    300 yards of lumber: 5.5K
    labor to assemble: 6.7K

    watching the neighbors annoying kid puke his guts out: priceless

  10. Re:Fragile? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno, but I'm still trying to get over the fact that an AOL customer built this thing.

  11. Cartman Land by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Soon he will have to let in two people to pay for the security guard. Then two more to pay for the upkeep. Then more for candy sales. Then he'll get all pissed off because he doesn't have it all to himself anymore and sell it back.
    End of story.

  12. Too much time and money on his hands? by vudufixit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm really tired of hearing normative statements like that. If someone has earned that money and/or time to pursue a hobby, no matter how unconventional, it is their absolute right to do so. Before we humans started generating agricultural surpluses above what we could hunt and gather, one person's idle pursuits could impact the ability of a whole community to feed itself. We don't have that situation now, and shouldn't feel the need to criticize anyone's idleness, if they have earned the right to it.

  13. Oklahoma pass times by nhavar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah to be young and bored in Oklahoma again... this reminds me just how little there is to do there. You either work yourself to death, drink the boredom away, or find a hobby like this guy (which I assume involves both).

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  14. Great job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since nobody else has said it,
    "Great job!"

    Of course, all of the early posts either talk about how much time it took, how boring Oklahoma is, how it can be dangerous, etc. People like Jeremy are actually DOING things instead of reading about them and being critical.

    Well done!

  15. Pot-kettle-black by WasterDave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A man with too much time on his hands builds a rollercoater? This is from people who spend all their spare time building kernels for a community developed operating system, pissing around with config files, fighting off RPM dependencies then telling the world how easy it all is?

    Do you not think there's a little, y'know, irony in the whole thing? Maybe "Rolldot. News for people that make rollercoasters. Stuff that matters." runs the occasional story about people making operating systems in their back bedroom.

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
  16. Nobody's riding though. by ndvaughan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not one of the pics (or movies, I believe) has anyone actually IN the car (if you can call that little wooden box a "car") as the coaster is operating. One pic has a view of the top of the first hill, but he could have just climbed up to take it.

    I have a feeling the first day he tested it out, it either :
    A) Caused serious injury, or
    B) Didn't work (couldn't make it up hill or around track)

    Just my suspicion.

    Dallas

  17. Resume by mrpuffypants · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check his resume and you'll see that he has some experience with Roller Coasters: Not only is he a mechanical engineer, but also once woked for Arrow Dynamics, which is one of the foremost Roller Coaster companies in the world.

  18. Re:Engineering??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You said: I'll be interested when I see a backyard roller-coaster with some actual engineering design work put in to it.

    The post immediately before yours said: Check his resume and you'll see that he has some experience with Roller Coasters: Not only is he a mechanical engineer, but also once woked for Arrow Dynamics, which is one of the foremost Roller Coaster companies in the world.

    Just because the freaking thing isn't over-engineered in steel and concrete to last through Hurricane Andrew, doesn't mean it isn't properly engineered. As someone else said, wood rollercoasters have a distinct look/feel/sound to them that steel cannot hope to match.

    If you're so smart, build one, or shut up. This guy has built a cool thing. What do you have to show for your life?