Slashdot Mirror


Telemarketers Sue Over "Do Not Call" List

Joey Patterson writes "CNN reports that 'Telemarketers expanded their legal challenge to the government's do-not-call list, suing a second federal agency over the call-blocking service for consumers that the industry says will devastate business and cost as many as two million jobs.'"

3 of 1,004 comments (clear)

  1. Hypocrites... by Gibble · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sure alot of people who work for telemarketers have their names on the list just so they don't get calls.

    --
    Gibble: Descriptive of an emotional state in which one's mind is scrabbling for some purchase on reality
  2. Re:In other words... by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The sad part about that two million jobs thing is that it's the entire legal basis of the suit. This is one in a string of lawsuits that are straying further from what's legal. Instead companies or class action groups just whine that they think something isn't fair. What's worse is that sometimes the courts go for it. If we keep going in this direction, there won't be laws or a constitution any longer. There will just be a judge who listens to two parties whine, until he proclaims the loudest one the winner.

    I would like to see some legal basis behind this challenge. What rights does it infringe? Where does it protect these rights in the constitution? Remember that stuff? That's what court cases used to be about.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  3. Embrace the change by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    True, there's no expressly stated right to privacy, but I'm of the school of thought that it can be inferred. Regardless, though...

    This isn't about the government killing off an industry. It's about protecting the people who are "bothered" enough to request not to be bothered. If I called you every night at dinner time, and if you did not welcome my call, you would ask me to stop. If I did not stop, then by definition, I would be harassing you, and you would have some right to protection by the law.

    The DNC list does not prohibit phone solicitations; it merely requires that solicitors prune their lists based on people's requests not to be contacted that way.

    Most people in that line of work are paid by commission anyway, so I feel that I'm doing them a favor by having them not call me because I *NEVER* buy anything sold by an anonymous phone (or door) solicitor. Rather than sue, these folks should embrace the change for the better of all mankind!

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?