Hardly Anyone Cares About Computer Voting Problems
Avidwriter writes "It's a sad thought that Roblimo explores in a NewsForge article about computer voting fraud and how you'd think all honest politicians would be working to make sure computerized voting systems are open source, and why open source wouldn't hurt well-run voting machine companies' profits. Not that most people care, since they don't even bother to vote, right?"
the need is for a government to protect the rights of the citizen, period. giving the susceptible public control over the system is not a means to that end.
I hope for lower turnout.
I think the reality is that fear of assasination will keep a monarch in line; it might work particularly well in a large country with a dense population. the king/queen is simply recognized as the ruler; there's no party animosity or voting scandals or congress for corporations to buy out.
I'm aware of the risks, but look what 'representative democracy' has accomplished -- by and large, a system where the elites are ruling anyway. viz DMCA.
They aren't allowed to ask you for ID.
It seems ridiculous, but because there's often a fee associated with getting a drivers license or non-driving picture ID, requiring said ID is viewed as 'discrimination' and forbidden.
And let's not even get started with the big 'Get Out The Vote' drives conducted by a particular wing of the political establishment that target populations likely to have high percentages of illegal aliens....
A Good Intro to NetBS