Slashdot Mirror


Best USB Flash Storage?

Jennifer asks: "I'm thinking of making the plunge and buying some sort of USB flashdisk. I just migrated to a laptop without a floppy, and want some sort of quick and easy medium, preferably bootable, for moving files around. My idea solution would be a SDcard reader that is small, bootable, Hi-Speed USB and sleek/sexy. SD based means I could have a number of cards ready to go, such as a linux card, a Win98 card, maybe even a Win2k card if I could pare the install down to 256MB, plus other stuff, including compatibility with my Palm. Is booting purely BIOS dependent? What have your experiences been with these things?"

25 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. USB Booting by questionlp · · Score: 5, Informative

    I believe that booting off of a USB port is BIOS dependent since it needs to be able to not only detect that the USB drive is a storage drive but also have a stack to use it like a hard drive or what-not.

    For instance, I am able to boot off of a USB memory key and a USB Zip drive on an IBM ThinkPad X20/X21, but not a T21. I haven't tried it on the A series or any of the newer T series.

    1. Re:USB Booting by keesh · · Score: 3, Informative

      You'll need a bios update for booting off USB on T, A and R series ThinkPads. Should be available on any TP with built-in USB ports (doesn't work if you're going via CardBus). I can boot off any USB stuff on a T30 (hit F12 at boot, Removable Devices -> Whatever).

  2. Other alternatives by tchuladdiass · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You mentioned that you want to use the usb drive as a replacement for a floppy. What about using your cdrw drive instead? At a buck a pop, cdrw's are much cheaper than flash storage, and with udf filesystem, you can random write to them. If size is a problem, I've seen those 210 meg mini cdr/cdrw's at varisous computer shows (although I don't understand why they cost more than a full size cd). Get a bunch of those, and if you need cases, you can get Gamecube cases (same size disk), and they'll fit in your shirt pocket.

    1. Re:Other alternatives by (trb001) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with CDRW is that when you take the discs to other computers, writing on them requires a CDRW drive. I thought about this too, I use the tiny (220Mb?) CDs to carry stuff to work since they fit in my shirt pocket, but I can't transfer anything from work to home because of no burner at work.

      Ideally, I would like to find a USB type drive that's cheap, then buy two of them...one for work, one for home. Any suggestions here?

      --trb

    2. Re:Other alternatives by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Furthermore, a 256 Meg USB2 drive is cheaper than a new burner.

      Really? OfficeDepot (or maybe OfficeMax) just had a 40x CD-RW for free. And you can get them for $20-40 without any rebates or any other hassle. The 256MB USB2 Flash cards have come way down in price, but they're not that cheap yet.

      Of course, that's not usable in a notebook :)

      If your burner is slow then your drive is either outdated or you have bad software... modern -RW's run at 32x and can rewrite a full CD in 3 mins. Flash memory is insanely slow in writing, so you'd probably be about even in overall time.

      All of that said, I do think a USB dongle device would be more convienent and easier to deal with than CD's -- smaller, easier to change, etc. -- but I had to correct your statement.

    3. Re:Other alternatives by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Ideally, I would like to find a USB type drive that's cheap, then buy two of them...one for work, one for home. Any suggestions here?"

      Well those dongle drives come in sizes up to 4 GB but they are only economical up to the 256-512 MB range. If that is enough for you, then go for it!

      You can also get USB enclosures for 2.5" notebook hard drives. Get one, put a 20G drive in it and carry it around.

  3. PC card adapter? by orangepeel · · Score: 3, Informative

    You started by asking about a USB flashdisk, which I interpretted as meaning a USB "memory key" of some type.

    But then you started talking about flash cards, so ... umm ... basically I have no idea if this post is even on topic.

    If you went with, for example, Compact Flash, you'll have the advantage of being able to use a PC Card adapter. I have little experience with laptops, but I suspect that while you may find the ability to boot off a USB-connected flash card is rare, the ability to boot off a PC Card of some type (or a device connected through a PC Card adapter) is more common. (At about $15 with little effort searching, PC Card adapters are also very cheap.)

    Case in point, I have an ancient IBM ThinkPad 560. It's 7 years old I believe ... it runs on an original Pentium 100 MHz CPU (floating point bug included at no extra charge). I was overjoyed when I realized that this older (yet very well designed laptop) could boot off a "new" technology Compact Flash card simply by using a PCMCIA PC Card adapter. That ability breathed even more life into an old laptop.

    --
    Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
  4. Password Protection? by retostamm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some USB Flash memories allow Password Protection. Is there Linux support for this feature? A Manufacturer says it only works on Windows, but I find it hard to believe that noone has used that.

  5. Do you really want it bootable? by zsazsa · · Score: 3, Informative

    Watch out -- SD is slllllllllllllloooooooowwwwww. Other flash formats are faster, but they're still really not suitable for running an OS from.

  6. SD doesn't hold as much as MMC! by molo · · Score: 4, Informative
    Given the choice between SD and MMC media, you should go with MMC. Why?

    A 16mb SD card came with my Palm m500. On the back of the card:
    Please note that while your new SD card is a 16MB card, only 14.6MB are available for your use, with the remaining 1.4MB in a security area on the card.

    So, MMC is definitely better in this regard.

    BTW, the MMC card reader that came with my RCA CC-9390 DVC camcorder works under Linux with the standard USB drivers. It talks SCSI over USB and then the card has a x86 boot sector and partition table indicating a FAT filesystem. It all works. I was quite surprised and impressed.

    I don't know if a SD card reader would work under Linux due to all the DRM crapola. I don't know of any open SD reader/writer drivers. There's a closed one for one of the Linux PDAs however.

    -molo
    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  7. Use CompactFlash! by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would strongly suggest using CompactFlash rather than SD. It's faster (no dealing with DRM), and is basically ATAPI: with a $5 reader, you can plug it directly into any ATAPI-compatible computer and boot just like a hard drive. Plus, if you've got your heart set on a full Win2K and Office XP install, Microdrives come in sizes up to 1 GB (although you lose the durability of flash; they're just tiny hard drives in a CompactFlash form factor). Plus, a quick trip to Pricewatch says that CompactFlash is about half the price of SD for any given size, and is availible in a wider range of sizes. You might lose Palm compatability, but, at least to my eye, the benefits outweigh that one loss.

    --

    That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    1. Re:Use CompactFlash! by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the original poster goes the route of buying a USB reader and swapping cards in and out, Lexar recently announced CF chips with a 4G capacity. (If you have to ask, you can't afford it).

      One issue with CompactFlash is that changing bits in one direction is fast and simple, but going the other direction requires a relatively slow erase cycle on an entire block of memory. Then on top of that, the number of erase cycles the part can survive is limited, on the order of 1E5 or 1E6. Lexar advertises smart controller firmware that remaps addresses to level out the load of erasures. In other words, if you toggle address $0F00 a zillion times, $0F00 may reach a different physical address each time so that no one block on the chip goes through a zillion/2 erase cycles.

      I don't know how well other vendors handle it. Any CompactFlash nerds here today?

    2. Re:Use CompactFlash! by mercuryresearch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's called wear leveling, and yes, the other CF suppliers have it too.

      It does reduce wearout, but you should really put any frequently updated and not too important files on a ramdisk.

      With my CF based machines, I just did a standard (but minimal) slackware install and then used "find" to locate any files that got touched after leaving the system on for a day. A startup script copies those files into a ramdisk and symlinks them back into the directory tree -- so I got a standard linux install with now wearout worries.

      Anyway, I agree -- CF is the way to go here.

  8. Some experience by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting
    For up, I have a review of a very nice USB flash RAM device here. It's particularly good because it doesn't have any extra features that require drivers in, say, Windows XP. I have not booted off of it though.

    I have booted off my USB2.0/Firewire Asus (SCB-1608-D) DVD-ROM/CDr/CD-RW drive though. It's a very nice drive and I recommend it highly and often. The Asus drive I've even gotten to mount under PS2 Linux and it comes with a handy little carry bag.

  9. SD can hold a lot more by cloudless.net · · Score: 2, Informative

    The current maximum size of a MMC is 128MB, but most likely you can only find 64MB cards on the market, on the other hand you can easily find a 1GB SD card.

  10. Palm as a portable card reader by cloudless.net · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't forget that your Palm is already a SD card reader. Just install Palm desktop on multiple machines then you can easily transfer files between them. Oh if you can a Tungsten T or Tungsten C, you can even transfer the files wirelessly.

  11. CDRW by dpilot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are you doing this?

    In addition to UDF, you need packet write, both "experimental." The packet write stuff I've been able to find seems badly dated. (>12-18 months) Plus it seems to be drive-dependent whether you can do it even with patches.

    Do you have some more up-to-date links you could share?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:CDRW by tchuladdiass · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's been a while and was with an older kernel, but I found current instructions at the linux from scratch hints site.

  12. Replace the floppy with a floppy by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As usual with an Ask Slashdot, you've jumped to the technology you want to solve your problem, without fully considering the problem.

    There are two things you want to do here. You want to be able to boot your laptop from a removable medium, and you want to transfer data to other systems. I don't see why you have to have a single solution for both. Maybe it's kewl to have a bootable USB key or SD card, but is it practical? Booting from external media is not something you have to do very often, but when you do have to do it, you really have to do it. So you need something reliable. Almost all recent systems can boot from the CD, so why not just burn all the boot images you might need onto CD? Or if you just have to have a read-write bootable device, get a USB floppy. (You'll probably have to buy one from the manufacturer of your laptop to get one that's bootable.) It's old-fashioned, and it isn't good for any serious data transfer, but it's very reliable. And you need reliable.

    The second problem is data transfer. Now, the main merit of a USB key is portability. But if your data is already on a laptop, you already have portability. If you want to transfer data between your laptop and another system, why spend a lot of money on a USB key, which requires multiple steps to accomplish the transfer? It's faster and cheaper just to connect the two USB ports directly.

    1. Re:Replace the floppy with a floppy by 2muchcoffeeman · · Score: 2
      The second problem is data transfer. Now, the main merit of a USB key is portability. But if your data is already on a laptop, you already have portability. If you want to transfer data between your laptop and another system, why spend a lot of money on a USB key, which requires multiple steps to accomplish the transfer? It's faster and cheaper just to connect the two USB ports directly [devdepot.com].

      That depends on how you define portability -- my USB key fits in my pants pocket. My laptop does not. My floppy and Zip disks do not. CDs do not.

      Forty bucks for a USB flashkey that's the size of my thumb is all the portability I need.

      --
      Prevent Windows piracy. Use Linux instead.
  13. No SD, usb+mp3 is neat by Tom7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, fuck "Secure Digital" media. All that means is that it is DRM-enabled.

    I got a USB flash drive that is also an MP3 player. It needs no drivers. It's not fancy in any way, but it's pretty cool and less than a hundred bucks for 128mb. It's the "Apacer Audio Steno."

  14. Puppy Linux... by nickos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're interested in trying to get Linux running off a USB flash device, have a look at Puppy Linux.

    I'm still not convinced that their move from WindowLab to FVWM95 as the default window manager was that clever though. Have they not seen the size of that thing?

  15. Lexar Pro 2.0 USB by Lester67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    with 256mb. It is sub $100 in price and works great.

    Even better, many systems detect it when booting to DOS even though it isn't the boot device, which allows you to format /s the disk and make a bootable USB with any OS you want on it. (Lexar swears up and down that it is not bootable though.)

    I've installed Win98 on it as well. Works like a champ!

  16. I might wait a bit longer &/or get this ... by adzoox · · Score: 3, Informative
    I have been looking at thumb drives & pen drives for quite some time now. For your solution, you'd be best advised to get a 9 in 1 memory reader (Only $15 at Computer Geeks) This reads SD/MMC/XD/Compact Flash/Memory Stick/Smartmedia - (some formats have more than one type)

    I'd also consider an XDrive II - it's a multiformat digital media reader that also can accept a hard drive. It comes in USB2.0 various flavors. (Bare or with internal HD)

    I use the XDrive II in my daily routine. You don't have to have a computer to offload digital media onto the internal hard drive as their is a copy button on the drive with a little LCD indicating status.

    IF you have to wait for a thumb drive -- a 1 gig + SD/MMC/XD reader of the Lexar Pro+ Jumpdrive is due out early next year. Also SD is being promised at 1 gig about that time and XD is promised to be 3 gig by the end of 2004. So if you don't like the XDrive suggestion, wait for this drive.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  17. Some thoughts by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Informative
    I just got my own USB dongle drive because my iBook has no floppy. Just to avoid confusion, I'll say this: As far as I'm concerned, USB Key Drives, Thumb Drives, Keychain drives, dongle drives are all the same things: Just a small usb dongle with flash memory hardwired into them.

    For the dongle drives, you have to consider the following: A lot of them 'support' USB 2.0 but only work at USB 1.1 speeds. If the drive reads and writes in the range of 4-6 megaBYTES/s then it is a true USB 2.0 drive. My Lexar Jumpdrive 2.0 Pro 256 MB is true USB 2.0. I love this tiny thing and I would definitely buy one again. But it is annoying to crawl around to the back of my desktop and plug it in.

    Of course the downside with dongle drives is you can't upgrade them. You could get yourself something like a JumpDrive Trio into which you can install and swap MMC cards, Secure Digital cards and Sony Memory Sticks. This gives you dongle functionality and size upgradeability. Honestly I don't like fumbling around with little flash cards so I did not buy one of these.

    A downside to both of these things is that for win98 machines you need a special driver installed (that won't fit on one floppy) to access the drive. But otherwise they are plug'n'play compatible over WinME, Win2k, XP, MacOS X and maybe Linux, I have not tried it.

    And no, I don't work for Lexar Media.