Slashdot Mirror


The GNU-Darwin World

proclus writes "The GNU-Darwin Distribution was founded to leverage the open source development dynamic and build the infrastructure for scientific computing on a new platform. Now GNU-Darwin is a major free software project, and the infrastructure, such as parallel computing and molecular graphics software is available to everyone via the web and on digital media discs. Check it out. Also, Apple has written up a story about it."

7 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Why does SRC ports have to be DISTRO Specific? by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'll be glad when someone creates a generic Ports that works across all platforms. The news that Gentoo, Fink and Darwin ports where working together was great news. Gentoo has Linux, Fink Has MacOSX, and GnuDarwin has x86 and PPC.

    FreeBSD/OpenBSD and all those Linux (Cooker type) distros have broken ports. Even the Binary only distros have broken packages. I think OpenBSD said 20%+ of BSD ports where broken, (anyone have the numbers?). This could fix all those problems across platforms.

    Very nice.

  2. Confusing... by jbx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    GNU is open source.
    Darwin is open source.
    So... what exactly are we getting here? LinuxPPC is faster than Darwin, so if you wanted something closer to GNU than Darwin, wouldn't you use that?

    What's the user benefit? This is for people who bought a Mac and don't want Apple's GUI work? Or is this all the stuff that Apple would like to put in Darwin, but can't, due to the GPL license?

    Speaking of which, there's this:
    Please note: GNU Project considers Darwin non-free software and therefore does not recommend the use of this operating system. (see http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/apsl.html)

    I mean, let me get this straight: GNU Darwin is the version of Darwin that the GNU project doesn't recommend?

    Can someone clear this up in plain English?

    --
    (sig) The last bug isn't fixed until the last user is dead. (/sig)
  3. Re:GNU-Darwin Background - Pudge is right by kuwan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to follow the GNU-Darwin project quite heavily. I had installed it along side OS X and was even on the mailing lists. I must say that they do (or at least did) have extremely talented developers that have done a lot of good work for the project.

    However, I found through the mailing list that the project is political to the extreme. Their most extreme bit of politics came when they decided to "discontinue" PPC development (as pudge mentioned) because they had issues with Apple. They were arrogant enough to think that this move would force Apple to backtrack on the things they had issues with.

    It was about that time that I decided to drop GNU-Darwin completely. What kind of project drops support for the hardware that > 90% of their user-base is using? Well, from the looks of it they, not Apple, have backtracked and are still supporting PPC.

    My advice would be to not take a second look at GNU-Darwin. Use Fink or OpenDarwin instead.

  4. Re:GNU-Darwin Background - Pudge is right by liyanage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I absolutely agree with this and the parent post.

    The politics and annoying GNU/GPL preaching on various mailing lists (and in the early days the insistence on installing/stomping onto Apple-supplied system parts in /usr/ instead of /usr/local) is what turned me off GNU-Darwin.

  5. Poor Examples by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You seem to drift topics. The APSL has nothing to do with FCP, Safari, or anything else in those lanes.

    >FCP

    Best of its class, hands down. This is called "making a competing product" and is normal business strategy--not forcing someone out of the market.

    >Safari

    You really need to stop drinking the Kool Aid.

    No one really competes with Safari, not because Safari, but because Safari is *good*. Apple distributed a sucky version of IE as its standard web-browser and that has a *lot* to do with the user experience for a typical user. They needed to replace it, and no other web-browser for the mac quite cut it.

    Once again. They produced a better product. Safari is now my primary web browser, not because I haven't used Mozilla or Camino, but because it is the best for what I do on the web (speed counts for a lot).

    >Soundtrack

    Who did Apple "force out" with this one?

    They also needed something so that labels could publish music in m4p format, suitable for the iTMS.

    You want an example? Take Watson. But none of your examples quite cut it.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  6. Re:GNU-Darwin Background - Pudge is right by Pathwalker · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Plus they are still running unchecked binaries right after they download them.

    Take a look at their quickstart script, which they suggest that you use by piping it to csh as root.

    The first few steps:
    1. Download a compiled wget binary using curl
    2. chmod 755 wget
    3. put wget in /usr/local/bin
    4. use the new wget to download some other code

    They never check to see if the download was corrupted, or if someone had replaced it with something else.
    Is it so hard to do something like:
    ...download wget...
    if [ `cksum wget | cut -f1 -d\ ` != 2989954681 ]
    then
    echo "Someone is playing silly buggers..."
    exit
    fi
    ...install wget...
    For each of the few programs and libraries that they need to download to get the package manager up and running?

    I've complained about this before, and I'm sorry to have to do so again, but running an unverified binary as root right after you download it is one of the STUPIDEST ideas I have seen.
  7. Re:GNU-Darwin Background: Pudge is Right! by pudge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We never said that we would produce no more new stuff for PPC, but rather that we would not link to proprietary libraries.

    You yourself wrote: Second, we will be moving our operations to x86, and we are putting the ppc collection into maintenance mode. Read it yourself if you forget.